I bet with as bad as the apparent conspiracy seems to be, it'll actually end up being something more ghoulish and banal.
My running theory is that the COVID protocols are going to come out as being grossly incompetent down the road. All of the shit they were doing outside of treating it as a simple respiratory disease just made things worse; from the isolation, to the ventilators, to the various vaccines. And it'll come out that alternative treatments showed promise but because they weren't included in the protocol, they were ignored or shot down entirely. In other words, a dogmatic adherence to policy will be shown to have resulted in a number of unnecessary deaths.
Then the second bomb will drop. That this adherence to policy led hospitals to begin an advanced level of triage, where people who weren't responding well either stopped receiving treatment or received more easily available treatments they knew wouldn't work, while also denying these people the chance for what have would been considered experimental treatment; again, because this course of action would have fallen within protocol. This way they would have ventilators and such for new patients who might respond better. So the hospitals essentially killed people who may have survived so they could treat new patients instead.
The money was a factor, I'm sure, but at the end of the day, it will have simply been some huge managerial blunder that killed a bunch of people, because pedantic bureaucrats were more concerned about guidelines and protocols instead of being sensible.
I know some of this is being discussed already, but when I say "come out", I mean it will be discussed and accepted openly in the mainstream.
Jinglebanger 0 points 10 hours ago
I bet with as bad as the apparent conspiracy seems to be, it'll actually end up being something more ghoulish and banal.
My running theory is that the COVID protocols are going to come out as being grossly incompetent down the road. All of the shit they were doing outside of treating it as a simple respiratory disease just made things worse; from the isolation, to the ventilators, to the various vaccines. And it'll come out that alternative treatments showed promise but because they weren't included in the protocol, they were ignored or shot down entirely. In other words, a dogmatic adherence to policy will be shown to have resulted in a number of unnecessary deaths.
Then the second bomb will drop. That this adherence to policy led hospitals to begin an advanced level of triage, where people who weren't responding well either stopped receiving treatment or received more easily available treatments they knew wouldn't work, while also denying these people the chance for what have would been considered experimental treatment; again, because this course of action would have fallen within protocol. This way they would have ventilators and such for new patients who might respond better. So the hospitals essentially killed people who may have survived so they could treat new patients instead.
The money was a factor, I'm sure, but at the end of the day, it will have simply been some huge managerial blunder that killed a bunch of people, because pedantic bureaucrats were more concerned about guidelines and protocols instead of being sensible.
I know some of this is being discussed already, but when I say "come out", I mean it will be discussed and accepted openly in the mainstream.