submitted by Crackinjokes to videos 1 weekJun 6, 2025 15:05:06 ago (+34/-0) (pocketnet.app)
MeyerLansky -1 points 5 days ago
Sufficient purity for what?You're in the weeds. How is your claim going to prove Hiroshima wasn't actually firebombed?Laser isotope separation is the answer to your question. In the 40s it was converting uranium into a gaseous state.But, again, creating it to be separated requires a breeder reactor.Neither of these processes or resulting product = a nuclear weapon. So, what's your point?
MeyerLansky -1 points 5 days ago
Sufficient purity for what?
You're in the weeds. How is your claim going to prove Hiroshima wasn't actually firebombed?
Laser isotope separation is the answer to your question. In the 40s it was converting uranium into a gaseous state.
But, again, creating it to be separated requires a breeder reactor.
Neither of these processes or resulting product = a nuclear weapon.
So, what's your point?