×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
32

If it's okay to force men to involuntarily fight in the war why is it not okay to force women to have at least three babies before they are 25?

submitted by Crackinjokes to AskUpgoat 1 dayMay 26, 2025 15:43:23 ago (+33/-1)     (AskUpgoat)

You know it takes around 8 and 1/2 months for women to go through gestation so what we're talking about is less than the period of time that a man would be required to fight in a war and less than the four years that they enlist for if they volunteer when there's not a war going on. And there's no risk of death to the woman really other than the most extremely slight risk of their death because of childbirth which is almost non-existent today.

So why is this not reasonable if they're not going out there and voluntarily having kids?

At least until society accepts the fact that we need to have millions of artificial wombs and we need to have them now turning out white European babies.

And yes the tech exists it's just apparently too dramatic for people to actually see a baby develop rather than imagining some magic is happening behind two inches of a woman's skin inside her body when it's actually the exact same thing happening.

I mean we are actually going to disappear from the planet and it's not going to just affect the non-existent next generation. What's going to happen is when you're 60 70 and 80 years old you're going to be one of the few white people living in America and whatever group has established political dominance like they have in South Africa your life for your last 10 or 20 years when you're at that minority group and you're the only white people around is going to be a living hell if not a deadly hell. So if you don't think you have a stake in this just because you're not worried about having no offspring you better think again.

We need millions of white European babies and we need them right now.


52 comments block

Like I said before, we're having different conversations entirely.

I am talking about aggregate behaviors as demonstrated historically where we have observation or record.
In general, humans breed in times of security and prosperity - not so much in times of hardship and uncertainty.
I am saying that beyond any other consideration - like the loss of majority status - based on the rate of accrual of the interest on our debt, we will hit an inflection point within the decade.
I am saying it is overwhelmingly likely that the world you know will no longer exist after that point - ever again.

What I am offering in regard to such a scenario are not really opinions at all; a population of untrained, uneducated, unskilled insurgents who have babies and young children all living under a hostile government, inside the theater of operations, are effortless to demoralize and defeat - simply endanger or kill the children.

Meanwhile, you are talking about your personal life choices.