You should rely on the logic of your content and not resort to ad hominems.
Not every other user allows logic to participate in discussion unfortunately. Ostensibly, what is even more infuriating is the rigidity of thought some users express when presented with exhibits that go against their pre conceptions, especially those around faith, these doctrinal beliefs and convictions based only on opinion, to the contrary of all presented evidence.
You sure you want to mimic his style rather than observe the rules of logical rhetoric?
Assuming this isn't the logical conclusion to a languishing debate.
but when you abuse the cherished beliefs of many users, you are just contributing to making this forum a toxic antisocial shithole.
Being correct is more important than being liked. Hard discussions are going to ruffle feathers and sometimes there is no polite way to tell someone not to chew dogshit with their mouth open. Some users believe in flatearth, others in the great icewall, not all ideas are created equal, nor should they be treated with respect or reverence.
Jews argue like that for a reason.
jews also tirelessly engage users with the same rhetoric to stagnate discussion. If different approaches always bear the same answers, it is either rigidity of thinking or a calculating effort to limit available discourse. At worst, it's to tire out users who are expending great time, study and resources only to be rebuked with 'exhibit A' ad infinitum at every road stop.
Epithets are a low effort way of providing criticism for correction of poor behaviour and signalling to other users with the nous to also make an assessment on users repeatedly expressing lesser ideas. If every effort isn't reciprocated in contributing to an adult discussion, then I guess we just have to make bullying great again.
UncleDoug 0 points 4 days ago
Not every other user allows logic to participate in discussion unfortunately. Ostensibly, what is even more infuriating is the rigidity of thought some users express when presented with exhibits that go against their pre conceptions, especially those around faith, these doctrinal beliefs and convictions based only on opinion, to the contrary of all presented evidence.
Assuming this isn't the logical conclusion to a languishing debate.
Being correct is more important than being liked. Hard discussions are going to ruffle feathers and sometimes there is no polite way to tell someone not to chew dogshit with their mouth open.
Some users believe in flatearth, others in the great icewall, not all ideas are created equal, nor should they be treated with respect or reverence.
jews also tirelessly engage users with the same rhetoric to stagnate discussion. If different approaches always bear the same answers, it is either rigidity of thinking or a calculating effort to limit available discourse. At worst, it's to tire out users who are expending great time, study and resources only to be rebuked with 'exhibit A' ad infinitum at every road stop.
Epithets are a low effort way of providing criticism for correction of poor behaviour and signalling to other users with the nous to also make an assessment on users repeatedly expressing lesser ideas.
If every effort isn't reciprocated in contributing to an adult discussion, then I guess we just have to make bullying great again.