[Some ignorance, along with some good points in this article - Excerpts only are below]
"When the Left was in charge, any speech that disagreed with the narratives being pushed by the Left – for example, that “masks” served to “stop the spread” – was delegitimized as “misinformation.” Now that the Right is in charge, any criticism of the policies or actions of the government of the state of Israel is about to be criminalized.
A vote was scheduled to take place in the House this week on something called the Anti-Boycott Act (H.R. 867) that, if it becomes law, will legitimize federal prosecution of anyone who “participates” in boycotts of Israel or its “settlements,” as its land seizures, forcible evictions and occupations of land previously settled by other people are styled.
That comment just indicted me – potentially. Under the tenets of H.R. 867, I could face a fine of up to $1 million and potentially 20 years in prison. Such comments, you see, constitute “anti-Semitism,” a crime far worse than raping underage girls (i.e., the Epstein list) which the institutional Right stopped caring about very shortly after it took power away from the Left. There is now “no specific timeline” for the dangled promise of arrests that are likely to never happen – because those criminals are not a priority.
----
But, you see, it is never acceptable to express revulsion (via disassociation) about anything done by the government of the state of Israel.
One must always support the government of Israel. Anything less is . . . well . . . you know.
----
The government of the state of Israel – like the Fuhrer of National Socialist Germany, interestingly – is always right. More finely, it is always in the right. And anyone who says otherwise is “anti-Semitic,” i.e., they loathe people who happen to be Jewish on account of the fact that they happen to be Jewish.
This is also interesting in view of the fact that the current Fuhrer of the state if Israel is not himself a Semite. He calls himself Benjamin Netanyahu but his surname is Mileikowsky and he is ethnically a Pole ; i.e, of eastern European origins. It is hard to divine how it is possible to be an “anti-Semite” for questioning the actions of a man who is not a Semite.
Screenshot
It is also hard to understand how it is that questioning what is done by the government of the Jewish state constitutes loathing of Jews. The Right used to rightly point out that it is not “hateful” to question that business of permitting men to use the women’s room because men are not women; i.e., to raise objections based upon facts. The Left’s tactic has been to shout-down facts by impugning motives. And now the Right is doing precisely the same thing.
-----
"It is all extremely “anti-Semitic.”
And it may soon be a greater crime than murder."
[CONTINUES]:
https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2025/05/05/the-first-amendment-is-anti-semitic/
yoooooooosh 0 points 4 hours ago
it's funny that they're trying to say 'mileikowsky' isn't a jew because he's from poland, as if most jews haven't been festering in eastern europe until the turn of the century. where is a real jew supposed to come from when your country is less than a hundred years old. also, dig into any israeli jew name, they all change their eastern european names to sound more middle east jewy because it makes it sound more authentic i guess.