“The psychology of the sexes in youth is totally different. The ideas of the average young man are those of one who expects to become some day a producer or at least a worker; the ideas of the average young woman are those of one who expects and intends (for here, too, Youth sees only personal victory) to rise into the leisure, non-producing or supported class.“
“The young man expects to accomplish something in the world, to earn much money, or "high position," in order to be able to marry the most charming girl. The "most charming girl," if she be temporarily forced to earn her own living, expects to find somebody who will marry her, give her more luxuries than she has been accustomed to, and lift her far above her companions. She hopes to become a member of the leisure class even if she never attains it.“
“Women are potential parasites even if they never become real ones, and this is the gist of the matter we are discussing. Why are nearly all small farmers reactionary, individualistic, distrustful, competitive? Because they hope some day to become gentleman farmers. Why are most small business men narrow, egoistic, conservative? For the reason that they hope one day to become men of Big Business. The young woman in America today possesses the same psychology. Being young, she not only hopes, she expects, to rise into the leisure class when some young man asks her for the privilege of supporting her through life.“
“Women, as a sex, are the owners of a commodity vitally necessary to the health and well-being of man“ “As a sex, women occupy a position similar to the petty shop-keeper, because they possess a commodity to sell or to barter. Men, as a sex, are buyers of, or barterers for, this commodity.“
“[Man] has four vital needs to satisfy while woman has only three, and woman possesses, for barter, for sale, or for gift, the wherewithall to satisfy one of these.“
“The more economic power a group, or a class, or a sex possesses, the more the state throws the mantle of its protective laws about it. Women are owners of a commodity for which men are buyers or barterers, and our modern laws protect woman at the expense of man.“
“The beautiful woman sees no need for intelligence nor for understanding because she has always been able to outstrip her less attractive competitors in making the best match and securing the rich husbands. And so her neurones rarely "connect," or react, except to stimuli pertaining to things that will enhance her charms and increase her selling price.“
“That there are [virtually] no women hoboes in the civilized world today is, [...] incontestable proof of the superiority of the economic status of woman over man”.
“Men love to [..] provide [women] with luxurious surroundings, because this advertises to the world the fact that they are able to purchase a superior, i. e., a higher priced commodity“
“Why, do you imagine, the woman who brings to a penniless husband, not only herself but a fortune as well, is looked down upon in many countries? [...] Is it not because both are unconsciously violating the code, or the trade "understandings," in giving not only of themselves, but their substance as well? These women are selling below the market, or scabbing on the job.“
"It is one of the most absurd notions derived from eighteenth century enlightenment that in the beginning of society woman was the slave of man. Among all savages and barbarians of the lower and middle stages, sometimes even of the higher stage, women not only have freedom but are held in high esteem."
"No matter how little the provocation, legally or sentimentally, any woman may kill almost any man, and the jury will render a verdict of Not Guilty. She has only to say that he "deceived her.""
15MAR 0 points 1 month ago
I like a lot of your rants actually, they are often very logical. We need more logical discussion about the true problems we face and how we can solve them.
Perhaps. One of my theories is that it is simply a bias against anything that could be interpreted as "pro-women," especially if it can thence be construed as "anti-men." The reason I believe this is because often the theories you present are dismissed outright and offhand; there is rarely any true debate and rebuttal of the contents.
I think the war of the sexes has reached critical mass, such that many men are swearing off women entirely due to a (misplaced) sense that women as a group are leading the attack against men. And so, there is this prejudice against anything that even hints at men being imperfect and women being "not terrible."
In other words, the way our culture has shifted has left many men jaded at the prospect that they should be considerate of women, and instead believe they should either disregard women or else strike preemptively at their perceived enemy; you already know all about MGTOW and figures like Tate. The fact is, those "pro-men" perspectives appeal to many men, in the exact same way feminism appeals to many women. You've made this observation before, both of those perspectives are two sides of the same coin of self-centeredness and victimization.
I think that the reason those perspectives are so popular is due to a lack of not just racial consciousness but also group thinking, or nationalism. Many who claim to be nationalists are in fact not, because true nationalism has no place for infighting. The National Socialists were true nationalists, they didn't waste time arguing about Protestantism vs. Catholicism, or Christianity vs. Paganism, or men vs. women. The elites have succeeded in atomizing us to such an extent that we have a nation of individuals, all paranoid about each other instead of focusing on who holds the reins.