Actually the executive branch doesn't need a reason to ignore the judicial branch. The judicial branch is not superior to the executive branch and they do not have to listen to any judicial rulings regarding actions of the executive. Even in marbury versus Madison the judicial ruling was a review and was advisory and was not an order nor could have been an order that wasn't forcible by the judicial branch. Once again the three branches of government are co-equal and the limits to their powers over the other branches and the checks and balances are exactly born out in the Constitution and the only check and balance on the executive branch is impeachment or not being reelected. Know where does it say a judge can tell the president what to do anymore than the president can tell the Supreme Court what to do or any more than the present can tell Congress what to do.
Crackinjokes 2 points 1 month ago
Actually the executive branch doesn't need a reason to ignore the judicial branch. The judicial branch is not superior to the executive branch and they do not have to listen to any judicial rulings regarding actions of the executive. Even in marbury versus Madison the judicial ruling was a review and was advisory and was not an order nor could have been an order that wasn't forcible by the judicial branch. Once again the three branches of government are co-equal and the limits to their powers over the other branches and the checks and balances are exactly born out in the Constitution and the only check and balance on the executive branch is impeachment or not being reelected. Know where does it say a judge can tell the president what to do anymore than the president can tell the Supreme Court what to do or any more than the present can tell Congress what to do.