I've been saying this from the beginning after learning about the shots- I think within ten or fifteen years, about 1/3 of the people who got the shots are going to suddenly develop a new form of AIDS. The shots fuck with your immune system, and we have no idea what the long-term effects of this are, since the drugs were untested. Normally, to be approved for human use, a drug must undergo fifteen years of trials.
And even those fifteen-year trials aren't enough to catch really bad side effects. A great example is risperdal, which was marketed as a non-narcotic ADHD medication. It seemed pretty effective at treating the symptoms of ADHD and it didn't have the abusability of Ritalin or Adderall. However, what it did do, was cause gynecomastia in boys: meaning it would make boys grow actual female breast tissue. The drug was quickly pulled from the market and a massive class action lawsuit was launched.
That was for a pill. A shot is far more invasive and likely to leave lasting effects.
BloodyComet 1 points 3 months ago
I've been saying this from the beginning after learning about the shots- I think within ten or fifteen years, about 1/3 of the people who got the shots are going to suddenly develop a new form of AIDS. The shots fuck with your immune system, and we have no idea what the long-term effects of this are, since the drugs were untested. Normally, to be approved for human use, a drug must undergo fifteen years of trials.
And even those fifteen-year trials aren't enough to catch really bad side effects. A great example is risperdal, which was marketed as a non-narcotic ADHD medication. It seemed pretty effective at treating the symptoms of ADHD and it didn't have the abusability of Ritalin or Adderall. However, what it did do, was cause gynecomastia in boys: meaning it would make boys grow actual female breast tissue. The drug was quickly pulled from the market and a massive class action lawsuit was launched.
That was for a pill. A shot is far more invasive and likely to leave lasting effects.