Marcus Aurelius was being counseled by senators to not carry through a social restructuring similar to the idea of Caesar Augustus after the defeat and death of Marc Antony, and pretty much everyone seen as a potential threat. Implementing a strict moral code and instilling virtue into the conscience of the people apparently is not a good political move and would cause him to fall out of favor with the citizenry and some senators...hence the concern for his public image and popularity.
It doesn't work like that today. Everything, anything and everyone has been been corrupted by the jew. Money has influence, honest men sell out for the right amount of influence and everyone beneath them and the votary that elected them to serve, get the shaft. Then there's the emotional pandering that appeals to the crowd and gives the impression that their grievances are priority and will be addressed, everyone will be taken care of, a solid policy of "yes to everyone"...and it's all bullshit.
ONE MAN, ONE RULER, ARBITRARY DEMANDS WITH NO QUESTIONS ASKED.
The only honest and honorable ruler of the last 750 years that I can think of who didn't give a fuck about what others thought of him is Vlad Tepes.
VLAD HAD A SURE WAY OF GETTING HIS POINT ACROSS, HE KNEW THAT THERE WAS A LOT AT STAKE, HE HAD TO BE SHARP AND ALWAYS AWARE OF HIS SURROUNDINGS. The way I see it is....WE'RE FUCKED.
The corruption is based upon each gentiles ignorance of everything (perceivable inspiration) for nothing (suggested information)...with each jew suggesting fiction to tempt gentile ignorance of reality.
Why are they so good at mass coordination (of the masses) and what incentives do they have to keep things going ? At some point it must get tiring, no ? Sociopaths grow old and die too, don't they?
reptillian 0 points 4 months ago
Why are they so good at mass coordination (of the masses) and what incentives do they have to keep things going ? At some point it must get tiring, no ? Sociopaths grow old and die too, don't they?