a) A jew suggests -isms to tempt consenting gentiles to mutually assault each other within a conflict of reason, like legal vs illegal.
b) Merely, adverb - "solely, only, and nothing more"...consenting to a jewish suggestion tempts gentiles to ignore that there's only perception, and nothing more.
c) From the Christian perspective...consenting to a suggestion puts it before ones one and only - monotheistic - perception, hence breaking the first commandment.
For example: "in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti" puts suggestion (in the name of) before perception (father; son; holy ghost).
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 months ago
a) A jew suggests -isms to tempt consenting gentiles to mutually assault each other within a conflict of reason, like legal vs illegal.
b) Merely, adverb - "solely, only, and nothing more"...consenting to a jewish suggestion tempts gentiles to ignore that there's only perception, and nothing more.
c) From the Christian perspective...consenting to a suggestion puts it before ones one and only - monotheistic - perception, hence breaking the first commandment.
For example: "in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti" puts suggestion (in the name of) before perception (father; son; holy ghost).