The shit is unreadable and the author doesn't seem to understand sarcasm versus true belief. I got 10 paragraphs into the 1st segment and it's clear that she's intent to just paint Fuentes as something he isn't using half truths, obfuscation, and outright lies in way that suggests she out to smear Fuentes but is lazy as fuck with the details.
Then, when you look into the author, Anya Parampil, you'll read that she "is a journalist based in Washington, DC. She has produced and reported several documentaries, including on-the-ground reports from the Korean peninsula, Palestine, Venezuela, and Honduras." Does this seem like the ideal person to be doing stories on a Catholic Right Wing Zoomer from Chicago, who gives his political opinions on foreign and domestic policies here in the US? NO!
Then, looking into her background, she is a jew that's married to Max Blumenthal, the jew founder of the greyzone.
So, here we have a jew, who normally writes about foriegn affairs of the US government, writing about a guy that clearly does not want jews in American giving their opinions on how a Christian nation should be run.
This explains the bullshit. Now, if you want, we can go though all the shit she said about Fuentes but that's not going to change, and has nothing to do with, what I asked you about re Kent.
Fuentes is very clear. He doesn't want jews involved in a Christian nation's politics. Jews don't tend to take very kindly to being told to butt the fuck out of our business. Fuentes isn't a "white supremacist" nor is he a "self described white supremacist". This article twists and bends the facts, outright lies, and omits very important and easily knowable details about Fuentes because it is clear that this filthy fucking jew doesn't like Fuentes because Fuentes doesn't care for filthy fuckin' jews interfering in the goings on of a Christian country.
As for Blumenthal and the Greyzone. I like Max Blumenthal. I usually like the work that the Greyzone puts out. Generally, the Greyzone is critical of Isrseli policy under the lacud leadership. Of course, it's still very pro-Isrsel, but just like a left leaning reporter can be pro-USA but anti-Rupublican, Greyzone is pro-Israel but just anti-Lacud.
The Greyzone gets involved in foreign policy issues like Venezuela, Korea, and Honduras when the US government intervenes in those countries' domestic policies only to offer up criticisms of US involvement and US interference in their domestic policies. None of which have anything to do with a 26 year old zoomer in Chicago who gives critique on the political atmosphere of Washington DC and the interference of filthy fuckin' jews in our political system.
So, why did Greyzone do such a lengthy smear piece of a jew hating Catholic half spic living in Chicago? You tell me.
But Id rather you just answer the question.
Kent is a former special forces officer and a former CIA asset. If the words "deep state" have any meaning at all, it includes this guy. Kent was making inrows into the alt-right community through Charlie Kirk and Turning Points. Fuentes made his name popular with his groyper war against Turning Points and Kirk, specifically, after Charlie Kirk echoed Nancy Pelosi and Hilly Clinton's suggestion that we "staple green cards to diplomas" of the immigrant flood of shit skins and chinks that are being used to suppress the wages of tech workers in this country. Then, when Turning Points and Charlie Kirk started welcoming nigger fags, like Rob Smith, and troons like "Lady MAGA", Fuentes went off and declared a "Groyper War" where he would have his followers attend TP rallies and ask difficult questions, most popular being, "How does anal sex advance Christian Conservative values for our country and our party?" which resulted in Charlie Kirk canceling that tour and Rob Smith going back to CNN and calling the alt-right "rayciss".
When Charlie Kirk started demanding screenings of attendees to his rallies to screen out the groypers, Kent stated making comments about Fuentes that were outright lies, so Fuentes responded about Kent running for office in a district that he doesn't even live in and started pointing out Kent's affiliation with the deep state. Kent blamed his election loss on this effort, and Fuentes was happy to take credit, cause FUCK THAT DEEP STATE FAGGOT.
Now, you're posting smear pieces by a filthy fuckin' jew that hates the jew haters, and who has taken the controversies between Margorie Taylor Green and pedo fag jew Milo and Fuentes and used then to rewrite history and to suggest that Fuentes is the Deep State when, in fact, he outted a deep state candidate, and is known for shitting on a fake Catholic jew faggot who married a nigger (Milo) and his anti-Trump handler, MTG.
FreeinTX 0 points 4 months ago
The shit is unreadable and the author doesn't seem to understand sarcasm versus true belief. I got 10 paragraphs into the 1st segment and it's clear that she's intent to just paint Fuentes as something he isn't using half truths, obfuscation, and outright lies in way that suggests she out to smear Fuentes but is lazy as fuck with the details.
Then, when you look into the author, Anya Parampil, you'll read that she "is a journalist based in Washington, DC. She has produced and reported several documentaries, including on-the-ground reports from the Korean peninsula, Palestine, Venezuela, and Honduras." Does this seem like the ideal person to be doing stories on a Catholic Right Wing Zoomer from Chicago, who gives his political opinions on foreign and domestic policies here in the US? NO!
Then, looking into her background, she is a jew that's married to Max Blumenthal, the jew founder of the greyzone.
So, here we have a jew, who normally writes about foriegn affairs of the US government, writing about a guy that clearly does not want jews in American giving their opinions on how a Christian nation should be run.
This explains the bullshit. Now, if you want, we can go though all the shit she said about Fuentes but that's not going to change, and has nothing to do with, what I asked you about re Kent.
Fuentes is very clear. He doesn't want jews involved in a Christian nation's politics. Jews don't tend to take very kindly to being told to butt the fuck out of our business. Fuentes isn't a "white supremacist" nor is he a "self described white supremacist". This article twists and bends the facts, outright lies, and omits very important and easily knowable details about Fuentes because it is clear that this filthy fucking jew doesn't like Fuentes because Fuentes doesn't care for filthy fuckin' jews interfering in the goings on of a Christian country.
As for Blumenthal and the Greyzone. I like Max Blumenthal. I usually like the work that the Greyzone puts out. Generally, the Greyzone is critical of Isrseli policy under the lacud leadership. Of course, it's still very pro-Isrsel, but just like a left leaning reporter can be pro-USA but anti-Rupublican, Greyzone is pro-Israel but just anti-Lacud.
The Greyzone gets involved in foreign policy issues like Venezuela, Korea, and Honduras when the US government intervenes in those countries' domestic policies only to offer up criticisms of US involvement and US interference in their domestic policies. None of which have anything to do with a 26 year old zoomer in Chicago who gives critique on the political atmosphere of Washington DC and the interference of filthy fuckin' jews in our political system.
So, why did Greyzone do such a lengthy smear piece of a jew hating Catholic half spic living in Chicago? You tell me.
But Id rather you just answer the question.
Kent is a former special forces officer and a former CIA asset. If the words "deep state" have any meaning at all, it includes this guy. Kent was making inrows into the alt-right community through Charlie Kirk and Turning Points. Fuentes made his name popular with his groyper war against Turning Points and Kirk, specifically, after Charlie Kirk echoed Nancy Pelosi and Hilly Clinton's suggestion that we "staple green cards to diplomas" of the immigrant flood of shit skins and chinks that are being used to suppress the wages of tech workers in this country. Then, when Turning Points and Charlie Kirk started welcoming nigger fags, like Rob Smith, and troons like "Lady MAGA", Fuentes went off and declared a "Groyper War" where he would have his followers attend TP rallies and ask difficult questions, most popular being, "How does anal sex advance Christian Conservative values for our country and our party?" which resulted in Charlie Kirk canceling that tour and Rob Smith going back to CNN and calling the alt-right "rayciss".
When Charlie Kirk started demanding screenings of attendees to his rallies to screen out the groypers, Kent stated making comments about Fuentes that were outright lies, so Fuentes responded about Kent running for office in a district that he doesn't even live in and started pointing out Kent's affiliation with the deep state. Kent blamed his election loss on this effort, and Fuentes was happy to take credit, cause FUCK THAT DEEP STATE FAGGOT.
Now, you're posting smear pieces by a filthy fuckin' jew that hates the jew haters, and who has taken the controversies between Margorie Taylor Green and pedo fag jew Milo and Fuentes and used then to rewrite history and to suggest that Fuentes is the Deep State when, in fact, he outted a deep state candidate, and is known for shitting on a fake Catholic jew faggot who married a nigger (Milo) and his anti-Trump handler, MTG.
Now, why is that?