Daycare are for complete strangers with no objective in mind but to raise a "citizen".
Guildsmanship often were selective and offered a distinct approach of masters having few apprentices. Guilds taking apprentices were free; the apprentice provided labour, and the guild provided shelter, knowledge and food. When the child came of age, the social contract involved him working for the guild and also provide for it the same way as it did for him.
You trying to equate both is what historians call "historical anachronism", when you apply standards, culture and norms of an age to another.
Razzoriel 0 points 6 months ago
Daycare are for complete strangers with no objective in mind but to raise a "citizen".
Guildsmanship often were selective and offered a distinct approach of masters having few apprentices. Guilds taking apprentices were free; the apprentice provided labour, and the guild provided shelter, knowledge and food. When the child came of age, the social contract involved him working for the guild and also provide for it the same way as it did for him.
You trying to equate both is what historians call "historical anachronism", when you apply standards, culture and norms of an age to another.