Most of the "sceptics" of the moon landing come from the same group that push flat earth. Just so you know, that the quality of the info you are getting is still on the flat earth level of basically paper napkin doodling.
I.e. people that know nothing about engineering, or anything about STEM in general, trying to convince you it never happened, with their "expert arguments".
I've looked through all of their arguments, I'm an engineer, and none if it is convincing. All it does, is show their lack of understanding. However the arguments are convincing enough, that people that lack STEM qualification (or basic common sense), can easily be fooled.
So if you are a sceptic of the moon landing, you are comingling with the flattard crowd by simple association. It's just the way it is.
I just take one example of their retard arguments:
"The moon lander was built by pieces of cardboard. Look how paper thin it is and you can see creases and pieces of tape and blah blah..."
They never mention mylar or kapton, and they probably never heard of it.
And here's the most important part:
The fact that they do not talk about those things, tells you one of two things:
1) They do not understand what they are seeing (i.e. lack of knowledge and expertise). or... 2) They are deceiving you on purpose.
qwop -2 points 7 months ago
Most of the "sceptics" of the moon landing come from the same group that push flat earth. Just so you know, that the quality of the info you are getting is still on the flat earth level of basically paper napkin doodling.
I.e. people that know nothing about engineering, or anything about STEM in general, trying to convince you it never happened, with their "expert arguments".
I've looked through all of their arguments, I'm an engineer, and none if it is convincing. All it does, is show their lack of understanding. However the arguments are convincing enough, that people that lack STEM qualification (or basic common sense), can easily be fooled.
So if you are a sceptic of the moon landing, you are comingling with the flattard crowd by simple association. It's just the way it is.
I just take one example of their retard arguments:
"The moon lander was built by pieces of cardboard. Look how paper thin it is and you can see creases and pieces of tape and blah blah..."
They never mention mylar or kapton, and they probably never heard of it.
And here's the most important part:
The fact that they do not talk about those things, tells you one of two things:
1) They do not understand what they are seeing (i.e. lack of knowledge and expertise).
or...
2) They are deceiving you on purpose.