You're just repeating the same post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.
"Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X." It is a fallacy in which an event is presumed to have been caused by a closely preceding event merely on the grounds of temporal succession. This type of reasoning is fallacious because mere temporal succession does not establish a causal connection.
Like I said already, I trust in Jesus and follow God's Word. The Bible teaches a motionless, stationary earth with a firmament.
You have no counter for this argument unless you simply do not believe in God's Word. In which case, why would I care what you think at all (beyond trying to wake you up to the kike lies you have been indoctrinated into)?
Love240 -1 points 7 months ago
You're just repeating the same post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.
Like I said already, I trust in Jesus and follow God's Word.
The Bible teaches a motionless, stationary earth with a firmament.
You have no counter for this argument unless you simply do not believe in God's Word. In which case, why would I care what you think at all (beyond trying to wake you up to the kike lies you have been indoctrinated into)?