It's informative but definitely slanted to how much of a "bad guy" he was. Zero mention of the holohoax and a brief mention of his distaste for jewish interests. The term holocaust they are using in this is more traditional. They're applying the word to the destruction of western Europe due to the war.
__47__ 1 points 6 months ago
It's informative but definitely slanted to how much of a "bad guy" he was. Zero mention of the holohoax and a brief mention of his distaste for jewish interests. The term holocaust they are using in this is more traditional. They're applying the word to the destruction of western Europe due to the war.