He covers that with "condemn the use of force... by individuals" His statement is a blanket condemnation of 'force', period. There's an argument that he's not literally retarded; That he's just poorly-skilled at communicating thoughts and meanings in his primary language and didn't really mean what he said. Okay, I'd accept that.
Sector2 0 points 9 months ago
He covers that with "condemn the use of force... by individuals" His statement is a blanket condemnation of 'force', period. There's an argument that he's not literally retarded; That he's just poorly-skilled at communicating thoughts and meanings in his primary language and didn't really mean what he said. Okay, I'd accept that.