×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0

In the natural process of growth in the human mind, belief does not follow proof, but springs up apart from and independent of it; an immature intelligence believes first, and proves (if indeed it ever seeks proof) afterwards. - George Grote -

submitted by McNasty to SPACEisFAKEandGAY 9 monthsJul 26, 2024 02:44:09 ago (+3/-3)     (SPACEisFAKEandGAY)

Exposing the Einstein Deception

Albert Einstein’s theories are often hailed as groundbreaking, but a closer look reveals a more troubling reality. Rather than advancing genuine scientific understanding, Einstein’s work involved significant manipulation to support the erroneous concept of a spherical Earth. Einstein distorted scientific principles to obscure the truth about this world and the luminescent ether medium which is a necessity for this world to exist.

The Michelson-Morley Experiment

In 1887, the Michelson-Morley experiment was conducted to measure the Earth’s motion through the ether, a medium essential for the propagation of light. The experiment aimed to detect variations in the speed of light caused by the Earth’s movement through this medium. The null result indicated that no such variations were observed, suggesting that the Earth was not moving through the ether.

Lorentz’s Theoretical Adjustments

Before Einstein, Hendrik Lorentz attempted to address the Michelson-Morley null result while maintaining the ether concept. Lorentz proposed length contraction, suggesting that objects moving at high speeds would experience a reduction in length. This adjustment aimed to account for the null result while preserving the ether as a necessary medium for light transmission.

Lorentz’s theoretical adjustment was not meant to challenge the ether itself but to address the problem of explaining why the expected effects of the Earth’s movement through the ether were not detected. By proposing that high-speed motion contracted the length of objects, Lorentz sought to reconcile the null result with the idea that the Earth was moving through the ether. The difficulty lay not in maintaining the ether concept but in maintaining the claim that the Earth was in motion.

Einstein’s Strategic Maneuver

Einstein seized upon the difficulties faced by Lorentz and others who tried to reconcile the Michelson-Morley results with the idea of a moving Earth. In 1905, Einstein introduced Special Relativity, which rejected the ether and proposed a framework based on The conceptual idea of spacetime—a unified continuum of space and time. Einstein argued that the null result demonstrated the irrelevance of the ether and that his theory could explain the observations without it.

Einstein’s Special Relativity was essentially an adaptation of Newtonian principles. As new observations began to challenge Einstein’s theories, the concepts of dark matter and black holes were introduced. Dark matter was proposed to explain anomalies in galactic rotation, while black holes were theorized to account for extreme gravitational effects predicted by Einstein’s equations. These concepts were theoretical constructs designed to fill the gaps left by the rejection of the ether, rather than emerging from direct empirical evidence.

The Enduring Influence of Einstein’s Theories

Despite growing evidence supporting the flat Earth and the reality of the ether, Einstein’s theories continue to exert a strong influence. This persistence is due more to historical momentum and Einstein’s prestigious reputation than to the accuracy of his theories. The scientific community upholds his ideas, even when they conflict with evidence.

Reevaluating Einstein’s Legacy

The ongoing acceptance of Einstein’s theories demands a critical reassessment. His rejection of the ether and the introduction of theoretical fixes like dark matter and black holes were strategic maneuvers to support a spherical Earth model, rather than genuine scientific advancements. Understanding the true role of the ether and the flat Earth model clarifies the inaccuracies in Einstein’s theories and encourages a more accurate view of the universe.

Moving Forward

The story of Einstein’s manipulation serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of skepticism and rigorous examination in science. As we advance our understanding of the cosmos, it is essential to prioritize evidence over theoretical constructs and challenge established beliefs. Embracing the true nature of our world will lead to a clearer, more accurate comprehension of the universe.

"Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists."

~Nikola Tesla~


1 comments block

deleted 0 points 9 months ago

deleted