No one said race is skin deep. Most of you clearly know far less about race than me. You know nothing about taxonomy, typology, phenotypes, or in this case genetic clustering. It is simply a fact that there isn't that much difference genetically between a Levantine and, say, a Maltese. This all lies across a spectrum. Sicilians are closer to Lebanese than Danes are. And these are ALL caucasoid groups. You do realize most Arabs are caucasoids, right? And Jews? This has to do with skull shape. Of course it is beyond skin. Baron Evola or Alfred Rosenberg even thought there was a spiritual dimension, or soul of a race as Rosenberg put it. Certainly a sense of identity kicks in. Bosniaks are Slavs. Yet clearly on the opposite side of the mind fence from Serbs, which they are very closely related to ethnically. Their language is identical really.
Joe_McCarthy 1 points 1 year ago
No one said race is skin deep. Most of you clearly know far less about race than me. You know nothing about taxonomy, typology, phenotypes, or in this case genetic clustering. It is simply a fact that there isn't that much difference genetically between a Levantine and, say, a Maltese. This all lies across a spectrum. Sicilians are closer to Lebanese than Danes are. And these are ALL caucasoid groups. You do realize most Arabs are caucasoids, right? And Jews? This has to do with skull shape. Of course it is beyond skin. Baron Evola or Alfred Rosenberg even thought there was a spiritual dimension, or soul of a race as Rosenberg put it. Certainly a sense of identity kicks in. Bosniaks are Slavs. Yet clearly on the opposite side of the mind fence from Serbs, which they are very closely related to ethnically. Their language is identical really.