I'm sure what's true for most people is they are happier believing people will stand up at some point. When's the last time that happened that wasn't prompted by one of the owners? They do fight for power and control of the human ranches among themselves. When they want the people to stand up, move to a different pasture, or replace their old beliefs with new, they send teams and Victoria Nuland types to get the job done. Things are the way they are because of the way humans are. The people don't stand up on their own.
People only pay their taxes because the IRS and courts will steal their savings, throw them in jail/prison.
The vast majority accumulated those savings by collaborating with the regime in the first place, and paying them off for the quid pro quo. They're guilty of everything they financed. Can't be collaborators and innocent. They may try to wiggle out of it by confessing to being nothing more than retarded cattle who couldn't be expected to know what they were doing.
I say taxpayers know quite well what they were doing, and they did it anyway. Well, now that they're getting genocided, they're all unhappy with the terms of their bargain with evil.
Yeah, I'm making both the cattle case, and the complicit case. Which is more compelling?
Sector7 0 points 1.8 years ago
I'm sure what's true for most people is they are happier believing people will stand up at some point. When's the last time that happened that wasn't prompted by one of the owners? They do fight for power and control of the human ranches among themselves. When they want the people to stand up, move to a different pasture, or replace their old beliefs with new, they send teams and Victoria Nuland types to get the job done. Things are the way they are because of the way humans are. The people don't stand up on their own.
The vast majority accumulated those savings by collaborating with the regime in the first place, and paying them off for the quid pro quo. They're guilty of everything they financed. Can't be collaborators and innocent. They may try to wiggle out of it by confessing to being nothing more than retarded cattle who couldn't be expected to know what they were doing.
I say taxpayers know quite well what they were doing, and they did it anyway. Well, now that they're getting genocided, they're all unhappy with the terms of their bargain with evil.
Yeah, I'm making both the cattle case, and the complicit case. Which is more compelling?