Is this just projection from personal trauma? Because plenty of people can imbide in substances without ruining their lives and/or hurting those around them.
Here’s the first time you tried to go ad hominem in order to “manipulate me”. It’s imbibe btw.
The reaction makes me wonder how much projection is really happening here. Did dad hit the sauce too much or too often?
Here you are again with the ad hominem.
These are all irrelevant red herrings that do nothing to refute my point.
But for some reason, an example in which I suggest that your 18 year old son is not capable of “self control” —because virtually no 18 year olds are—is me taking a cheap shot.
Nope.
Your ad hominems were cheap shots and irrelavant to the argument. My practical example of your 18 kid being unable to resist heroin or booze was not. So spare me the outrage.
I'm not going to be like my parents and simply order my kids to comply, with no elaboration or flat out dismissal when questions are asked
So now you’ve just told me your coping narrative to explain why you fucked up but your kid won’t. He will. He will make similar mistakes. I hope he doesnt but he probably will. You think you will just ‘splain it better and he will be safe. If that worked, nobody would be an alcoholic.
Your kid is at risk. All our children are at risk. We roll the dice with our children at stake when we allow porn, booze, heroin, coke, gambling, prostitution, caffeine, all that shit. These are the things that make our country a hellscape. Its the same as releasing a contagious disease. Why would you do it? Human beings are vulnerable to alcohol addiction. Stop incentivizing the spread of this disease.
You have no logical rebuttal to my sane dispassionate argument that we are all worse off because of alcohol consumption. Only the sort of overly emotional hyperventilating I see above.
I'm an agent of true freedom Helena, and with freedom comes danger. Being a prisoner of "society" and "collective morality" is worse than being free in my opinion,
Only a nigger living in the Congo is truly free. Don’t delude yourself. Whites like Scandinavians can get by with less regulated societies because they were bred to be naturally more risk averse and more egalitarian, i.e. they are bred for collective morality. Those with a penchant for freedom to do what they want were killed of in cold Europe. They thrived in the Congo. European notions of freedom came in the context of a tightly proscribed moral context to not screw each other over. Alcohol sale is exploitation which degrades social cooperativity by spreading a burden over the entire collective.
You think whites arent collective? Haha. Just look what happens when kikes control our collective culture and economics. We are rudderless. Our whole fucking white strategy is collectivist. Thats why we insist on high moral standards and niggers do not. In nigger land its every man for himself. Lots of freedom.
Look at the Japs. Are they free? Sure. Except for their highly restrictive traditional moral culture which emphasizes japs should live for all other japs and not be a self indulgent pig. No freedom to do that.
Your freedom is the will of the wisp. Its the freedom of jews and other elites or shitskins and degenrates to live off the productive, sensible, average moral white person exploitively. Its the freedom to be a drug addled degenrate and have some sober person still feed you and house you. Theres no such thing as pure freedom. Its a trade off. By limiting vice, you limit bad actors to thrive while contributing nothing. Whites sacrifice self indulgent behaviors to maintain an egalitiarian honest population which operates on meritocracy. Sins and vices are all behaviors that harm the entire society by destroying economic efficiency. Such behavior disincentivizes cooperativity and trust and increases intra-group individual competition, which is bad. White strategy is high in-group cooperativity and inter-group competition. We defeat other groups through increased efficiency. This is the only reason white lives matter and black lives dont. Its evolution.
PostWallHelena 0 points 1.8 years ago
Here’s the first time you tried to go ad hominem in order to “manipulate me”. It’s imbibe btw.
Here you are again with the ad hominem.
These are all irrelevant red herrings that do nothing to refute my point.
But for some reason, an example in which I suggest that your 18 year old son is not capable of “self control” —because virtually no 18 year olds are—is me taking a cheap shot.
Nope.
Your ad hominems were cheap shots and irrelavant to the argument. My practical example of your 18 kid being unable to resist heroin or booze was not. So spare me the outrage.
So now you’ve just told me your coping narrative to explain why you fucked up but your kid won’t. He will. He will make similar mistakes. I hope he doesnt but he probably will. You think you will just ‘splain it better and he will be safe. If that worked, nobody would be an alcoholic.
Your kid is at risk. All our children are at risk. We roll the dice with our children at stake when we allow porn, booze, heroin, coke, gambling, prostitution, caffeine, all that shit. These are the things that make our country a hellscape. Its the same as releasing a contagious disease. Why would you do it? Human beings are vulnerable to alcohol addiction. Stop incentivizing the spread of this disease.
You have no logical rebuttal to my sane dispassionate argument that we are all worse off because of alcohol consumption. Only the sort of overly emotional hyperventilating I see above.
Only a nigger living in the Congo is truly free. Don’t delude yourself. Whites like Scandinavians can get by with less regulated societies because they were bred to be naturally more risk averse and more egalitarian, i.e. they are bred for collective morality. Those with a penchant for freedom to do what they want were killed of in cold Europe. They thrived in the Congo. European notions of freedom came in the context of a tightly proscribed moral context to not screw each other over. Alcohol sale is exploitation which degrades social cooperativity by spreading a burden over the entire collective.
You think whites arent collective? Haha. Just look what happens when kikes control our collective culture and economics. We are rudderless. Our whole fucking white strategy is collectivist. Thats why we insist on high moral standards and niggers do not. In nigger land its every man for himself. Lots of freedom.
Look at the Japs. Are they free? Sure. Except for their highly restrictive traditional moral culture which emphasizes japs should live for all other japs and not be a self indulgent pig. No freedom to do that.
Your freedom is the will of the wisp. Its the freedom of jews and other elites or shitskins and degenrates to live off the productive, sensible, average moral white person exploitively. Its the freedom to be a drug addled degenrate and have some sober person still feed you and house you. Theres no such thing as pure freedom. Its a trade off. By limiting vice, you limit bad actors to thrive while contributing nothing. Whites sacrifice self indulgent behaviors to maintain an egalitiarian honest population which operates on meritocracy. Sins and vices are all behaviors that harm the entire society by destroying economic efficiency. Such behavior disincentivizes cooperativity and trust and increases intra-group individual competition, which is bad. White strategy is high in-group cooperativity and inter-group competition. We defeat other groups through increased efficiency. This is the only reason white lives matter and black lives dont. Its evolution.