If you look at the history of microsoft, Bill Gates and Paul Allen did it. Of course they had some help. But... If you had close relationships with numerous people in the industry, conclusions you would arrive at are that Apple did much to establish gates/allen. Beyond that, if you examine the advent of the IBM PC, and you are a bit of a conspiracy theorist, you would conclude that IBM/microsoft were in concert in the earlier years, along with a long term plan developed by the clowns. Why? Well, IBM already had a desktop before the PC, based on the Motorola 68000, but it was oriented towards UNIX. Unix is stable and difficult to break into. The PC was based on the intel junk (8086/88), and couldn't run Unix. At the time, Digital Research also had an OS that was pretty good, for the CPM computers. But DR wouldn't lower themselves to do the instructions of the clowns, which was to build an unstable and very hackable OS, enter microsoft, which had no OS (it was bought). Evolution through the years provided a perfect platform that was utterly ridiculous if you were a software engineer, and lent itself to precisely the difficulties windows now has. This was all evolutionary, and facebook was a part of it (LifeLog, DARPA, cia). Money was made by developing viruses and the prevention thereof, and since facebook is a product of the cataloguing of YOUR data, and since intel has holes along with windows, it's a perfect platform to do the deep state things it does. It is also indicative that the cia is at minimum a partial supporter of microsoft. Gates is a foul person, through and through. Obviously. Anyone who says different needs history.
Seadevil110 0 points 2 years ago
If you look at the history of microsoft, Bill Gates and Paul Allen did it. Of course they had some help. But...
If you had close relationships with numerous people in the industry, conclusions you would arrive at are that Apple did much to establish gates/allen. Beyond that, if you examine the advent of the IBM PC, and you are a bit of a conspiracy theorist, you would conclude that IBM/microsoft were in concert in the earlier years, along with a long term plan developed by the clowns. Why? Well, IBM already had a desktop before the PC, based on the Motorola 68000, but it was oriented towards UNIX. Unix is stable and difficult to break into. The PC was based on the intel junk (8086/88), and couldn't run Unix. At the time, Digital Research also had an OS that was pretty good, for the CPM computers. But DR wouldn't lower themselves to do the instructions of the clowns, which was to build an unstable and very hackable OS, enter microsoft, which had no OS (it was bought). Evolution through the years provided a perfect platform that was utterly ridiculous if you were a software engineer, and lent itself to precisely the difficulties windows now has. This was all evolutionary, and facebook was a part of it (LifeLog, DARPA, cia). Money was made by developing viruses and the prevention thereof, and since facebook is a product of the cataloguing of YOUR data, and since intel has holes along with windows, it's a perfect platform to do the deep state things it does. It is also indicative that the cia is at minimum a partial supporter of microsoft. Gates is a foul person, through and through. Obviously.
Anyone who says different needs history.