Sign into an existing account

You'll notice talk about injecting chickens and cattle. This is really about justifying
the power to test with manipulated PCR tests. When the tests fail, they kill the herd or flock entirely.

Let me explain.

The covid scam failed to complete the transition to total lockdown, due to too much soft pushback.
The only alternative for killing the zombies (banks and inflation genie) then is a two pronged approach:
Kill demand, and war to distract from the problems lack of demand creates.
What kind of problems?
Mass unemployment, counter-intuitive re-inflation as consumer tightening leads to companies slimming down their logistics chains and production levels.

The coming 'economic collapse' is a managed form of destruction.

But how do we get there when supply is still to plentiful?
"trade wars" combine with "covid/avian flu outbreak". Thats what the warehouse fires, food processing fires, refinery explosions, and more, are about. At the local level, these companies are underwater due to bad debt now that interest has risen. Theres a ton of insurance fraud going on from the looks of it, and because it reduces supply (causing prices to rise and thus reduce demand) it appears federal agencies nationwide have been tasked with ignoring it. Which means the insurance companies are probably being underwritten by..somebody. But I'm getting off topic

Now if pandemics and sabotage destroy supply, war keeps people working and keeps cooperating companies profitable, what keeps store shelves from running dry due to lack of goods, under production, "hoarding" (we'll get to that in a minute) and so on? If shelves are bare, when goods and materials aren't flowing through the economy, how do you keep people from totally revolting?
The same way you select for loyalty, or enforce vaccines, or decide who can and cannot travel, where, and how far. The same way you get people to stop buying ammo, or limit what they can buy. The same way you get people to trade away everything, including their freedoms sooner or later.

You implement rationing.
Rationing solves all these problems. yes, all of them.

The initial pandemic either failed, as I suggested, or merely existed to create the pretext for this broader setup.

Whatever the case, rationing does one thing, and does it really good:
It tightly controls demand. It can be used by the regime to reduce or increase demand at-will relative to some baseline.

And because of the war, soldiers can be occupied or sent to die over seas, leaving the populace at the mercy of whatever organizations are erected to "keep the peace" and control the rationing.

By doing it this way, the state get everything. It can cut off anyone. it can limit any popular revolt at a regional level.

More importantly, by destroying demand, inflation drops relative to interest. Liquidity flees cash. With rationing in place, new trade blockades, and cash losing its value domestically as a medium of exchange, the populace becomes accustomed to it, and the idea of central bank digital currencies, if not embraced, will begrudgingly be accepted as people will have no other choice. Some will fight, but based on the popular response to various crises over the years, I don't suspect it will be enough people. And those who do will not be organized. ill lack the proper logistics to win. And as we've seen they will not be able to avoid break-up operations by the regime's domestic secret police. Either the regime wins in the long run, or at best, it stalemates for years, or the regime falls but the rebels still lack the initial organizational discipline to affect an interim replacement government, leaving a power vacuum with all the eventual chaos and destruction that would lead to. Stalemate or pyrrhic victory are the best outcomes. Being immediately bombed by foreign governments, or invaded for "humanitarian relief" would also likely follow immediately prior to, or during, the fall of the regime.

Now part of the rationing, like the covid scam cult, will be the cultists themselves, the fanatics. These setups also require a devil, someone to demonize, or to make into the 'other'. Take your pick for boogiemen. But the goal here will be as much confiscation of property (without inspiring revolt) as possible, mostly to pay for state debts. Naturally things like racial division and religious conflict will also be inflamed, the "privileged" and the "oppressed."
We saw during the covid pandemic many blacks giddy to demand whites put masks on, to "get whitey back", and many more people of all stripes got to exercise small acts of pettiness and power in the process.

In this scenario some segments will be intentionally shorted on rations, be it electricity, gas, or food. This will be an infrequent burt regional thing that will occur from place to place, say at the state level, to brew up anger before 'fixing' the "inequity" so it doesn't boil over completely. Once people are angry regionally, these shortages and events are blamed on the middle class, whites, christians (mormons for example) or any other enemies of the regime.
The intent is to get them to want to participate, to go after others, to enforce the party line in all walks of life.
Anyone that had property before "the collapse" (or whatever it is called) will be seen to have "gotten it good while good could still be got, and keeping the opportunities and riches of it for themselves." in the same way the regime abortively has attempted to blame the antivax movement for "not informing people who got the vax and got injured." or "intentionally keeping the truth secret and encouraging them to get the vax so they and their children would be injured."

This will be spun off into riots in suburbia and less dense places like the countryside. Remember when the regime's sockpuppets said "we're coming for you in the suburbs, small towns, and countryside too!"
This is what they meant.

In order to assist this process, we'll have a reverse "cash for clunkers", where car manufacturers are given incentives by the government to donate vehicles to "those in need."
The eligibility list will be curated, covertly, by race, religion, political affiliation, and past political activities. it will be run by activist and NGO regime uniparty apparatchiks whose loyalties are well known. Essentially, what this means, is a boat load of vehicles will be given to people linked to, or affiliated with, blm, antifa, and u.s. based marxist organizations.
This will be their new and improved logistics system, instead of busses which are clumsy, large, and highly visible. This will be both their transport and their housing, which will entice many homeless lunatics and drug addicts into their recruitment pipeline. Kind of like the u.s. giving cash for clunkers trucks to jihadists.

These will be organized into convoys full of violent derelicts, who will be controlled and controllable because they'll still rely on money from the national organs, namely for food, gas, and drugs, where any of those things aren't stolen.

Simultaneously the roll out of bumper stickers, decals, and license plates, going on for years now, all indicating you're a gun owner, is a hundred flowers campaign--designed to show vehicles that may be easy targets for gun theft. This will be an early tactic, and we will see a sudden rampant nationwide trend of gun thefts that the police will be 'baffled by' and 'unable to stop'.
The bigger source of weapons will come from the cartels, laundering american weapons left in afhganistan, back over our border.
Based on the previous playbook seen in new christchurch NZ, where the mosque was heavily rumored to be involved in storing weapons for jihadists, synagogues and mosques will be the primary storage depots for these weapons.

Understand, with saudi arabia allied to israel, russia in a fight for its life (and winning), turkey playing the middle, and NATO agitated, while the u.s. looks for a war to distract from internal problems and save the dollar, Iran's leadership must feel like it is slowly being isolated.

Meanwhile, with israel slowly losing its grip in the u.s. to china, and china concerned of internal uncontrollable revolts in the u.s. threatening its current political containment (control of many elements of the u.s. government and society through blackmail and bribery), the 2024 elections are probably its last chance to take taiwan. It views this direct challenge to the u.s. as the gold-plated standard necessary to legitimize itself (and its sphere of allies) as a viable alternative to unipolar international economic rule lead by the u.s. Belt and road fails if china fails to take back taiwan. If china fails to take back taiwan, the ruling regime in china de facto loses the faith of the party membersip. China devolves into PLA rule and likely suffers years of fractious flare ups of regional revolt. This causes china to lose maybe a decade in all the various races, the space race, the economic race, the industrial race, the currency blocs race. China likely never recovers this century, as other regions pull ahead or reach parity with it, permanently boxing china in. The take back of taiwan, for china, isn't about the chips. It's about legitimacy itself.

Meanwhile the u.s. ability to hold taiwan is seen by the rest of the world as a bellweather about the petro dollars supremacy, vis-a-vis the u.s. military's ability to protect our allies and coerce them into line. Failure to hold taiwan, or certain other critical territories, is seen by the rest of the world as a de facto judgement on the dollar. The death of the dollar is now considered inevitable, only the outcome decides if it dies in 5-10 years, or if it limps along and then dies in 50.

The examination of this scenario therefore highlights the same is true with the outcome of the ukraine war. It then makes sense to therefore predict the u.s. will eventually directly enter the ukraine war. It has no other options. The failure of the dollar, without a knock-on war, means failure to control the population domestically. A lot of feet end up kicking in cold terrified futility above a short drop before the blackness of the end consumes ten thousand corrupt officials, maybe more. As hyperbolic and vivid a description that is, thats what will happen if the u.s. experiences a greater collapse due to loss of the dollar status all flowing from the failure to take ukraine--a thousand factions all suddenly fighting each other lose control of the situation as they no longer have the cash or resources to keep their fiefdoms and lackies in line. And while they end up fighting each other, the populations discontent from the economic implosion ends up becoming cerberus, grown big on misery, before eating up those same official and their lives. If you want an example go look at how rome dissolved as they debased their currency.

If we lose with russia, then war with china is inevitable. China will see we are weak and make their move, either gradually, in staccato "diplomatic events" like accidental skirmishes, sabotage, open threats, and on-and-off-again fighting, cycling between outbreaks of small scale unofficial battles, and armistices, all labelled in regime propaganda as mere "escalations and ratcheting incidents." as if war hadn't already broken out between them and taiwan.

Likewise the u.s., losing a war with russia, to save face, and control the populace while the world responds by panicking on the dollar (either dumping, or initiating talks of 'economic policy changes')--the u.s. declares it is "preparing for a war with china. one we can no longer avoid while trying to keep the peace."
The u.s. immediately begins restocking weaponry, building new factories (sabotaged), even buying back, at a massive premium, weapons we previously sold to our allies. The u.s. also immediately pivots to blaming covid on china, and riling mass anger against them. The u.s. even admits openly the vax damage, how china "fooled the world", and "poisoned billions of people" as if the regime in the u.s. wasn't the biggest pusher of the poison in the world. At this point the population would be frothing at the mouth for a war, if not, a pretext could be manufactured, like pearl harbor.

In fact, examining this, we see the u.s. is already pursuing "don't blame us. blame china" and it is this very response that indicates the u.s. thinks it has already lost the war against russia. if this is true, and makes sense, then russia already knows this as well, and will sooner or later interpret this as carte blanche that the u.s. won't fight, but if pushed, will instead complete the final collapse of our war effort and 'commitment' in ukraine as nothing more than a straw man. The u.s. may in fact feign even greater weakness, with the explicit intent at this time, of hastening the end of the war, by encouraging russia to go all in.

If I'm correct we should shortly see a new, larger scale push by russia to wrap up the war. If not, then their plan is to force the u.s. to stay engaged, with low level actions that cause us to be drawn back in whenever it appears we may break off support of ukraine.

Meanwhile, knowing all this, knowing the u.s. would pivot to a war with china if we failed in ukraine, and seeing all the indicators that this is the correct scenario, the chinese will not risk any further loss of control in the u.s--not before they can act.
This likely means china will very soon start the landgrab for taiwan. Maybe cut it off, or use emergency aid as a carrot in diplomatic negotiations. But any such cajoling greater than they are currently engaging with would effectively force the u.s. hand.

Now the opening phases of the death of the dollar would destroy the supply for goods made by the chinese middleclass (effectively destabilizing china) because the demand (traded in dollars among chinas economic partners) would be severely undercut at least in the short-term. China knows this so they know their move has to be made before the u.s. loses to russia in ukraine, or at least before the rest of the world can start talks about abandoning the petrodollar.

Therefore the limiting factor for china's next move, is the u.s. dollar status globally following from the outcome of ukraine.
And because this is already being decided at the the level of heads of state, at least in the private discussion phase, therefore china's time is short. They are forced to make a move. A reverse zugzwang.The obligation to do something in this scenario, for them is an advantage, even if it means moving up their timeline.

In all of this, and because of all of this, the u.s. will, very soon, perhaps in no more than 12-16 months switch to a national rations system. Maybe a regional "grid down" event, resulting in localized riots in a few major cities would do it. Maybe it will be a "cyber attack" that takes down EBT for a few days, prompting a massive change in the public discussion and "bipartisan calls for a safety mechanism."
Maybe "cyber war" will resort in constant low level, nationwide interruptions to credit cards, ebt, gas pumps, the works. The only solution? "rationing until the end of the war or the cyber attacks die down."

Whatever the excuse, expect it. Maybe it starts out with one thing, one category, food. Or gas. Or something else.
But I don't think so. It will very quickly expand to almost every aspect of life and the economy. Hoarders will be blamed. Panic will be blamed. Panic will be intentionally inflamed through the media. The toilet paper shortages were a test run of this mechanism. It's a playbook.

When these things happen, expect china and israel to kick off larger-scale destabalization efforts, and to go so far as to militarize these elements under a big umbrella, islam, a race war narrative, or marxism, probably a bit of all three.
This will be to embarrass the u.s., sabotage war efforts, sow doubt about the u.s. being able to preserve the dollar and its allies "when it can't even get its own house in order", and more importantly exhaust middle class gun owners and anyone that might fight back if china ends up in a broader conflict with the u.s. and somehow wins against the u.s. If china can score some big disasters, like organized revolts in the u.s (left or right), mass casualty events like 9/11, then it also manufactures the pretext, should the u.s. regime fall, to send troops over to provide "humanity relief."
That of course is a gamble by itself.

This is what is coming. Be prepared.