Uh-huh. It would probably be more convincing if they hadn't been using the exact same fucking "Oh, he was AWOL", excuse to give themselves plausible deniability since at least the late 50's, ffs.
Otherwise they'd have to admit that nato/us.mil/ZOG forces are participating openly in direct conflict with Russia and that they've already kicked off WWIII.
that would make him a 35 year old Navy Seal.
In other words they're sayin that a guy with 17 years of his life ( nearly half of his life) invested in his Navy career, and that was only 3 years from collecting his 20 retirement pension, suddenly decided to chuck it all, "for the freedom of the peace-loving Ukrainian people".
BulletStopper 1 points 2.3 years ago
Uh-huh. It would probably be more convincing if they hadn't been using the exact same fucking "Oh, he was AWOL", excuse to give themselves plausible deniability since at least the late 50's, ffs.
Otherwise they'd have to admit that nato/us.mil/ZOG forces are participating openly in direct conflict with Russia and that they've already kicked off WWIII.
In other words they're sayin that a guy with 17 years of his life ( nearly half of his life) invested in his Navy career, and that was only 3 years from collecting his 20 retirement pension, suddenly decided to chuck it all, "for the freedom of the peace-loving Ukrainian people".
Pull the other one. It's got bells on it.