Whether they will be due to a pandemic or some other disaster, I cannot say. But in order to suppress inflation (and save the banks) multiple nations will have to lock people down.
It also means the war in ukraine will likely wind-down and the potential war over taiwan won't happen. War production raises demand. Higher demand means higher prices, means price hikes in everything.
If the u.s. can't afford it, it must mean no one is interested in our debt anymore. Only way to fix that is either repatriate gold/silver (might be the reason for them pushing stacking through the 'alt media' since 2008). That or destroy the banks. Or both. I don't think we're getting a digital currency yet, but the introduction of the next crisis will be used as the pretext for it: its how you'll get your gas/food rations, and how they track your vaccination status. You won't be able to buy gas without it (though vaccination will still be optional, if not strongly coerced.)
Food, gas, and electricity will be the big gotchas for rationing. Compliance with vaccination, will yield "rewards" in the form of larger rations. This will be struck down by courts if theres too much backlash, and then re-instituted by other courts when things simmer down, and then struck down again if people get upset, ad infinitum. The courts job is to whipsaw policy in the right tempo, at a rate that legislative and executive action can't.
Likewise I expect using your "full ration" will only be possible if you go indoors, which will require masks. Everyone else gets a half ration or something if they pay at the pump. Or maybe the majority of checkout lanes are mask/vax only, so you wait much longer.
Whatever the policies will be, expect them to squeeze you in every which way.
They won't likely put a direct limit on how far you are allowed to drive each day, except in places like the west coast and parts of the east (though toll roads may raise fees significantly).
The thinking is that they have to reduce consumer demand to reduce inflation. Its the same reason we haven't gone to war.
They're worried about hyperinflation, which means the threat is real. At a certain level the distinguishing line between "intentional" and accidental vanishes. Kind of like a performer attempting to pull off a stunt, failing horribly, and claiming they meant for it to happen that way. You plan for failure to minimize the impact if something risky goes wrong. This is close to that, contingency thinking.
I think the reason for it may be to do with the failure of vaccine uptake, and that the long term plan was 'children of men' (not that I necessarily buy into predictive programming, only that writers and filmmakers tend to explore hypotheticals like a lot of us here). On a lark, I'd say a common tactic when something being done is going to lead to one disaster, the propagandists tend to put out competing false disaster rumors. So when the false disaster doesn't come to pass, people dismiss the danger of all others--right up until the disaster happens.
Everything we see, from the famines under soviet rule, to the malthusian fixation of globalism, to the propaganda itself, decades in the making--everything indicates the push for population management is real. Bomb policy ("you dont invade us, we dont invade you..because of The Bomb" i.e. MAD) is just 1984's warring superstates and it means we can't 'solve' population that way, not for a few decades at least, but I could be wrong.
What they are likely concerned about is dysgenics in the long term (following from the EU and globalism's adoption of these ideologies from western schools and germany), pollution, and arable land, which is fading (thanks to soy production). Those are the actual topics of concern for any elite because those things, and not some others, are what would challenge stability long term, and therefore challenge their power. If you looke at the papers on world3, arable land and pollution were two of the key variables.
Oil and gas production is ancillary to this, but essential to fertilizer production. And what have we seen talked about for the last 3-5 years? Fertilizer production.
And what has been one of the key areas affected by the war in europe?
Fertilizer production.
Population die off due to starvation is essentially collateral damage. Which would explain why they're so insistent on factory produced/lab grown meat.
It's not about C02 or energy. It's about land and food. But I ain't telling you anything you don't already know.
prototype 0 points 2.5 years ago
"Guess we'll see about the lockdowns."
The thinking is that they have to reduce consumer demand to reduce inflation.
Its the same reason we haven't gone to war.
They're worried about hyperinflation, which means the threat is real. At a certain level the distinguishing line between "intentional" and accidental vanishes. Kind of like a performer attempting to pull off a stunt, failing horribly, and claiming they meant for it to happen that way. You plan for failure to minimize the impact if something risky goes wrong.
This is close to that, contingency thinking.
I think the reason for it may be to do with the failure of vaccine uptake, and that the long term plan was 'children of men' (not that I necessarily buy into predictive programming, only that writers and filmmakers tend to explore hypotheticals like a lot of us here). On a lark, I'd say a common tactic when something being done is going to lead to one disaster, the propagandists tend to put out competing false disaster rumors. So when the false disaster doesn't come to pass, people dismiss the danger of all others--right up until the disaster happens.
Everything we see, from the famines under soviet rule, to the malthusian fixation of globalism, to the propaganda itself, decades in the making--everything indicates the push for population management is real.
Bomb policy ("you dont invade us, we dont invade you..because of The Bomb" i.e. MAD) is just 1984's warring superstates and it means we can't 'solve' population that way, not for a few decades at least, but I could be wrong.
What they are likely concerned about is dysgenics in the long term (following from the EU and globalism's adoption of these ideologies from western schools and germany), pollution, and arable land, which is fading (thanks to soy production). Those are the actual topics of concern for any elite because those things, and not some others, are what would challenge stability long term, and therefore challenge their power. If you looke at the papers on world3, arable land and pollution were two of the key variables.
Oil and gas production is ancillary to this, but essential to fertilizer production. And what have we seen talked about for the last 3-5 years? Fertilizer production.
And what has been one of the key areas affected by the war in europe?
Fertilizer production.
Population die off due to starvation is essentially collateral damage. Which would explain why they're so insistent on factory produced/lab grown meat.
It's not about C02 or energy. It's about land and food. But I ain't telling you anything you don't already know.