Interesting presentation, yet rife with nitpicking and assumptions. Assumptions of the same sort that there is any real and major differences between the 101 flavors of xtians.... nitpicking in that slight rewordings, additions and subtractions render the three abrahamic-based religions different religions....rather than a retelling and continuation of the same old bullshit in different packaging.
I will admit it is bloody convenient for the xtians that desperately crave ecumenical solidarity with jews, to pretend there are good jews and bad jews via semantics and hairsplitting. A very necessary thing for a Doomsday Cult dependent on jews to realize their much drooled over Armageddon.
anon 0 points 2.8 years ago
Interesting presentation, yet rife with nitpicking and assumptions. Assumptions of the same sort that there is any real and major differences between the 101 flavors of xtians.... nitpicking in that slight rewordings, additions and subtractions render the three abrahamic-based religions different religions....rather than a retelling and continuation of the same old bullshit in different packaging.
I will admit it is bloody convenient for the xtians that desperately crave ecumenical solidarity with jews, to pretend there are good jews and bad jews via semantics and hairsplitting. A very necessary thing for a Doomsday Cult dependent on jews to realize their much drooled over Armageddon.