What a twisted article. Using language development to pretend that heterosexuality itself is invented rather than changing definition of the words to describe it.
Also the authors logic about “when did you chose heterosexuality” is a false premise in that it is the default path. They “chose” heterosexuality by not being molested as children or succumbing to other deviant sexual influences.
There is currently zero evidence of genetic causes for homosexuality. There is significant evidence for fluidity of sexual proclivities, ergo current science demonstrates that homosexuality is environmental, not natural.
FluffyBunnySlippers 0 points 3.3 years ago
What a twisted article. Using language development to pretend that heterosexuality itself is invented rather than changing definition of the words to describe it.
Also the authors logic about “when did you chose heterosexuality” is a false premise in that it is the default path. They “chose” heterosexuality by not being molested as children or succumbing to other deviant sexual influences.
There is currently zero evidence of genetic causes for homosexuality. There is significant evidence for fluidity of sexual proclivities, ergo current science demonstrates that homosexuality is environmental, not natural.