Most reactors in use today have a 30year refuel cycle (give or take)
Uranium has the downside of radioactive uranium remaining in the core, which needs to be processed and stored for 10,000+ years. There are also fission products that last for generations, which also need to be processed and stored.
Thorium produces much shorter term radioactive byproducts, which means it can just be stored without needing to be processed - think just turn it off and wait for x years, then just take apart like any other equipment.
But I don't think any alternate energy sources beside wind or solar are ever going to be available - just doesn't fit the (((narrative))). The entire energy sector, if locally sourced with limited (((corporate))) involvement would destroy the kikes from the ground up.
Solving the energy problems of the people makes everything else trivial. The kikes won't ever allow that.
localsal 0 points 3.3 years ago
Most reactors in use today have a 30year refuel cycle (give or take)
Uranium has the downside of radioactive uranium remaining in the core, which needs to be processed and stored for 10,000+ years. There are also fission products that last for generations, which also need to be processed and stored.
Thorium produces much shorter term radioactive byproducts, which means it can just be stored without needing to be processed - think just turn it off and wait for x years, then just take apart like any other equipment.
But I don't think any alternate energy sources beside wind or solar are ever going to be available - just doesn't fit the (((narrative))). The entire energy sector, if locally sourced with limited (((corporate))) involvement would destroy the kikes from the ground up.
Solving the energy problems of the people makes everything else trivial. The kikes won't ever allow that.