I'm sorry, I was unclear. I like the post and despite what another users says about the source, I think the source uses very careful language to describe the phenomena identified in the microscopy, which is a good practice. This is restrained language and is intentionally used to prevent leading to a conclusion without further examination and evidence. It "appears" is the best conclusion one can come to regarding something 10 microns large without further isolating it and doing whatever tests are needed to better associate its behavior with that Trypanosoma cruzi.
HughBriss 0 points 3.6 years ago
I'm sorry, I was unclear. I like the post and despite what another users says about the source, I think the source uses very careful language to describe the phenomena identified in the microscopy, which is a good practice. This is restrained language and is intentionally used to prevent leading to a conclusion without further examination and evidence. It "appears" is the best conclusion one can come to regarding something 10 microns large without further isolating it and doing whatever tests are needed to better associate its behavior with that Trypanosoma cruzi.