Your country belongs to the people who built it and their descendants, and to the people who paid for its upkeep (law enforcement and national defense supported by taxes) and their descendants.
This they should collectively have property rights over their country, and who is allowed to enter should be determined by the aggregate consent of the population (usually this is represented in a democracy by voting on the matter).
The 1965 hart sellar immigration reform act was never ratified by vote, and was imposed on a population that strongly opposed it with their consent to the change even being asked of them.
anon 2 points 3.7 years ago
I've been saying this a long time.
Your country belongs to the people who built it and their descendants, and to the people who paid for its upkeep (law enforcement and national defense supported by taxes) and their descendants.
This they should collectively have property rights over their country, and who is allowed to enter should be determined by the aggregate consent of the population (usually this is represented in a democracy by voting on the matter).
The 1965 hart sellar immigration reform act was never ratified by vote, and was imposed on a population that strongly opposed it with their consent to the change even being asked of them.
It's definitely a violation of property rights