Don't forget the original stomping ground of 'influence bots' (the name for weaponized chatbots) was arguing against people skeptical of vaccines on twitter: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140
Also, don't forget the man who was banned from reddit for trapping the next generation of these influence bots: https://files.catbox.moe/42dskv.png
I've written at length about these topics before, so ask for more if interested.
-
I'm pretty sure I've argued with a number of these before, they subtly miss the point or miss the implicit portion of a statement, etc, or fixate on the wrong part of a post. The problem is that people do that too, and you can only tell when you have gone back and forth and realized you are making no headway; it is as if they cannot follow the thread.
I'm also pretty sure the user here, try (who also wen't by nil, oaf, and HRCisDONE), is one, though I personally don't mind as we need some bots of our own for balance.
aleleopathic 16 points 4 years ago
Don't forget the original stomping ground of 'influence bots' (the name for weaponized chatbots) was arguing against people skeptical of vaccines on twitter: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140
![]()
Also, don't forget the man who was banned from reddit for trapping the next generation of these influence bots: https://files.catbox.moe/42dskv.png
I've written at length about these topics before, so ask for more if interested.
-
I'm pretty sure I've argued with a number of these before, they subtly miss the point or miss the implicit portion of a statement, etc, or fixate on the wrong part of a post. The problem is that people do that too, and you can only tell when you have gone back and forth and realized you are making no headway; it is as if they cannot follow the thread.
I'm also pretty sure the user here, try (who also wen't by nil, oaf, and HRCisDONE), is one, though I personally don't mind as we need some bots of our own for balance.