×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
-18

Blonde's 6 minute webcam solo

submitted by Joe_McCarthy to Playboy 3.0 yearsMay 22, 2021 20:36:15 ago (+2/-20)     (Playboy)



14 comments block


[ - ] con77 10 points 3.0 yearsMay 22, 2021 20:57:25 ago (+10/-0)

this shit again? you fukn jew

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 23, 2021 11:44:37 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 12:01:23 ago (+1/-0)*

Maybe. But don't you think Playboy is not porn as it is simply nudity with no sexual acts?

https://gfycat.com/maleilliterateamericanredsquirrel

The above is a few seconds from a Playboy video. A sprawling, up close shot of 1999 Playboy Playmate of the Year Heather Kozar's hairy snatch. Playboy videos are known for such shots. They do cause sexual arousal - and if causing sexual arousal is the intent that can be said to be pornography.

But then Ava Gardner pin-ups could be said to elicit much of the same response.

It's why I said somewhere else that different people have different porn thresholds. Unsurprisingly more conventional, older, religious, conservative people have lower porn thresholds. In my opinion it's only really clear cut when you get into penetration. Hardcore porn. That is to say what is clearly meant to be porn. Not a kind of art or simply erotica or something essentially girlie in a general sense. A little vague perhaps - but in some sense this is in the eye of the beholder.

I think if one goes by the Meese Report - which was some attempt to seriously examine pornography - porn is meant to offend, degrade, or shock. They had depictions of rape or something in mind. So even beyond entry level hardcore. And that report was issued pre-internet before mass porn exposure desensitized the public at that. They didn't include Playboy or Penthouse as porn. Would they include solo videos? Dunno. Those only really came into their own over the last 15 years or so with streaming technology. And with the desensitization that has occurred in the 35 years since that report was released I don't think it is a stretch at all that a report dealing primarily with the harmful effects of choke porn or harder hardcore fare would shrug its shoulders over this blonde diddling herself on a webcam. Personally I don't think it is degrading. Though some would. I think the tendency of beautiful women doing this is to glorify them in fact. She's certainly in all her glory as it were. One has a sense that a glimpse of heaven is being viewed.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 13:00:43 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 13:11:43 ago (+1/-0)

The vagina is not even necessarily nice to look at. So if it is partially obscured that can be good.

Watching women, any kind of watching, is inferior to doing them. But I don't think your position makes sense at all. Of course guys would want to watch their favorite female celebrities diddle themselves for example. Marilyn Monroe? Britney Spears? Fucking them would probably be better - but how many get to actually do that? Second best is still good - and honestly probably better than real sex with some inferior chicks.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 13:23:11 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 13:32:25 ago (+1/-0)*

That's true. But I do think it is worth noting that this isn't just another kind of porn. Solo is exploding like no other with the rise of OnlyFans. It's part and parcel of what is being called a new sexual revolution. There is probably some merit in being familiar with this trend for its sociological effects if nothing else. One possible issue I could see is men might come to prefer it to actually having sex with the women. Some men. Too soon to tell. But with the kind of viewing repetition gaining steam now I think that could be possible.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 13:49:46 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 14:09:11 ago (+1/-0)

I think they pay for the girlfriend experience and they're trying to bang the chicks. With clubs, including strip clubs, being closed for much of the last year it doesn't surprise me this is moving more and more online. Plus these are mostly attractive women to varying degrees. It is getting harder to find attractive women in America just anywhere. AND dealing with women is increasingly a mine field in the #MeToo era anyway. OnlyFans reduces risk.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 24, 2021 14:10:29 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Systemisgay 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 23, 2021 12:39:07 ago (+0/-0)

She thicc af

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 23, 2021 13:47:36 ago (+1/-0)

Is that good or bad?

[ - ] Systemisgay 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 23, 2021 14:53:10 ago (+1/-0)

Good Also nice feet

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -3 points 3.0 yearsMay 22, 2021 20:41:22 ago (+2/-5)

This is very impressive.