Sign into an existing account

is the modern man?
------

The puppet-masters say he is the
smartest, most advanced individual to ever strut the planet, the
most relatively liberated being in history. But Louis-Ferdinand
Celine said it well, "What does the modern public want? It
wants to go down on its knees before money and before crap!"

The public have been trained to do this by two principle
methods: direct "speaking" archetypal messages of pure terror
("psychic driving" as the CIA's Dr. Ewan Cameron termed it),
encoded in massively publicized "lone nut" mass murders, and
the sinister flattery heaped upon them by their masters in the
cult of civilization and progress.

The acid test of a human being's freedom and will to protect
the quality of his life, lies in a person's attitude toward his
oppressor. What is modern man's attitude toward Wall Street
and the bankers, toward Dan Rather and the ignorance-
bestowing media and advertising man, toward Lincoln and
Truman, FDR and Reagan, George Bush and Johnny Carson,
Exxon and Monsanto?

As one writer has observed, "The most amazing thing about
the American people is that they are constantly defending their
worst betrayers." Who then is the modern man? He is a mind-
bombed patsy who gets his marching orders from "twilight
language" key words sprinkled throughout "his" news and
current events. Even as he dances to the tune of the elite
managers of human behavior, he scoffs with great derision at
the idea of the existence and operation of a technology of mass
mind control emanating from the media and government.
Modern man is much too smart t o believe anything as
superstitious as that!

Modern man is the ideal hypnotic subject: puffed up on the
idea that he is the crown of creation, he vehemently denies the
power of the hypnotist's control over him, even as his head
bobs up and down on a string.

Michael A. Hoffman II - Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare Page 10
https://www.howardnema.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Secret-Societies-and-Psychological-Warfare-by-Hoffmann-1.pdf

"Klaus Schwab is out; Peter Brabeck-Letmathe takes over with immediate effect"

"Peter Brabeck-Letmathe (“Brabeck”) is an Austrian businessman and former chairman and CEO of the Nestlé Group.

Writing in The Guardian in 2006, Jane Martinson noted that “Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is an unlikely bogeyman. Yet ask many food campaigners to name their least favourite corporate executive and the silver-haired Austrian at the head of the world’s largest food company, Nestlé, would come high on many lists.”

As well as Nestlé, he has also held positions on the board of directors of Credit Suisse Group, L’Oréal and ExxonMobil.

Additionally, Brabeck has been involved in various influential organisations and events. He is a member of the Attali Commission, the European Round Table of Industrialists and the London Technology Club. He is chairman of the Geneva Science and Diplomacy Anticipator (“GESDA”) Foundation, which was launched in 2015 by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs to find ways to strengthen Geneva’s role in global governance. He is also the founder and chairman of the 2030 Water Resources Group, a public-private partnership that operates within the World Bank.

And last but not least, he has been a longstanding vice-chairman of WEF’s board of trustees. With Klaus Schwab stepping down as head of WEF’s board of trustees on 20 April, Brabeck has been named interim chairman until a new chairman has been found.

WEF has established a “Search Committee” to select a new chairman, a WEF statement said on Monday, without indicating when a new chair might be appointed. According to CEO Today, Brabeck’s close relationship with Schwab and longstanding involvement in WEF make him the clear frontrunner to become Schwab’s permanent successor.

Contents of this article shows his significant involvement in the following and continues with full details at the link:

Brabeck, Nestlé and the 1973 Chilean Coup
Attali Commission
European Round Table of Industrialists and Bilderbergers
2030 Water Resources Group
The London Technology Club

https://expose-news.com/2025/04/24/klaus-schwab-is-out/ [THIS ARTICLE LINK]
----------X
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe 1944— [BUSINESS Biography]
https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/biography/A-E/Brabeck-Letmathe-Peter-1944.html

https://www.lssu.edu/resources/about-lssu/traditions/unicornhunters

I'd like a framed Unicorn permit on my all.

Your average semi truck, piece of heavy equipment, locomotive, etc needs a set of filters every year. My local parts guy said he thinks all the filters might be made in China. If true, you should take this seriously. Either invest in domestic infrastructure or rice and beans.

Edit: and they are screwing with the part numbers too. The fuel filter that sparked this conversation is very clearly wrong even though its the same part number.

"Sweden: Just one in 10 purchases is made with cash, and card is the most common form of payment, followed by the Swedish mobile payment system Swish. Due to threats of war in Europe, Swedish authorities are trying to encourage citizens to keep and use cash in the name of civil defence. Cyber attacks on digital currency are also a concern. In the past, Sweden prioritized efficiency, but now it is pivoting to cash for safety and accessibility. Last year Norway brought in legislation requiring retailers to accept cash, or they can be fined or sanctioned.
----
Sweden is not the only Nordic country backpedalling on plans for a cashless society. Last year Norway, which has a popular equivalent to Swish called Vipps MobilePay, brought in legislation that means retailers can be fined or sanctioned if they will not accept cash. The government has also recommended that citizens “keep some cash on hand due to the vulnerabilities of digital payment solutions to cyber-attacks”. [MORE]:

https://needtoknow.news/2025/03/sweden-returns-to-cash-life-without-money-in-your-pocket-is-not-the-utopia-sweden-hoped/

Anglin decommissioning everything?

Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland

[IMAGE] "President Johnson had been involved in illegal Zionist activities since the 1930s and had a "special relationship" with Israeli president Levi Eshkol, seen here at Johnson's ranch in 1966.

Lyndon B. Johnson, who became the president on the day Kennedy died, was an ardent Zionist and devoted supporter of the state of Israel. His aunt Jessie Johnson Hatcher, who was a major influence on Lyndon, was a member of the Zionist Organization of America. While it seems very likely that his family was in fact Jewish (i.e.Crypto-Jews), there is absolutely no question that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland to Galveston. The smuggling operation of Jews to Texas in which LBJ was involved from 1937 is known as "Operation Texas".

While it seems very likely that his family was in fact Jewish (i.e.Crypto-Jews), there is absolutely no question that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B’nai B’rith….”.

SOURCE:
LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy
November 18, 2013
http://www.bollyn.com/lbj-the-zionist-cover-up-of-the-conspiracy-to-kill-kennedy-2/

-----

"Very Disturbing: This is how the question was posed to the Marines: "The U.S. Government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non‑sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. "Consider the following statement:'I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government'." The question was then posed as to what degree the individual Marine agreed with the statement. According to results given in Cunningham's thesis, a total of 88 percent, or 264 Marines, responded to the question. Of the 264 who responded, 26.34 percent, or 79 Marines indicated they would be willing to fire upon U.S. citizens."

Of that total, 18.67 percent or 56 Marines, indicated they "agree" with the statement, and 7.67 percent or 23 Marines, indicated that "strongly agree." A total of 61.66 percent, or 185, indicated that they were opposed to firing on citizens.

Of that total, 42.33 percent, or 127 indicated they "strongly disagree" and 19.33 percent or 58, indicated they "disagree." In is thesis, Cunningham noted: "This particular question, unlike the others, elicited from 15.97 percent of the respondents with an opinion, either heavier pen or pencil marks on the response or written comments in the margin space. The responses to this scenario suggest that a complete unit breakdown could occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission."

In other words, if a commander asked the men of his unit to raise their hands in a simple poll, he could determine the position of such servicemen and those who responded in the affirmative could be tasked for such a mission. This is just one of the reasons the question, not to mention the fact that it was allowed to be asked, is obviously potentially dangerous. In fact, several months before the survey was taken at Twenty‑Nine Palms, the SPOTLIGHT, MODERN GUN and other publications revealed the question posed by Cunningham in his survey had ben asked of members of a U.S. Seal (Sea‑Air‑land) team. In addition, despite Navy and Marine Corps denials, there have been dozens of reports, unconfirmed, that the survey has been given to other servicemen, as well as various law enforcement agents.
--------
The results of another question, No. 45, posed by the survey indicates American soldiers are not eager to swear allegiance to the United Nations, although nearly one in four would do so. Question 45 states: "I would swear to the following code:'I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense'." A total of 69.33 percent, or 208 Marines surveyed, indicated they disagreed, with 117, or 39 percent, indicating they strongly disagreed.

On the other hand, 71 Marines, or 23.66 percent, indicated they would be willing to swear such allegiance to the UN, with 19, or 6.33 percent, indicating they were strongly in favor of doing so. "For thousands of years." Cunningham notes in his thesis, "military organizations have required their soldiers to swear to some kind of code or allegiance. A code provides a standard for the soldiers to live up to and, in many cases, to die for. A code can be a powerful tool for establishing and sustaining unit cohesion. But what if the mission a solider is assigned to perform counters or confuses the code he has sworn to uphold? Question 45 was presented to determine if the solders would swear to such a code." No one knows if the American personnel traveling in the helicopter shot down over Iraq [by "friendly fire"] in April 1994 would have sworn allegiance to such a code.

Yet, Vice President Albert Gore stated that these Americans "died in the service of The United Nations." "It is patently clear," a retired high ranking Army Officer told The SPOTLIGHT,"that this survey raises some very serious issues, not the least of which is that U.S. servicemen are not being properly educated as to the limits of their service in the civilian sector. This is most dangerous, and, I should think the Congress has an obligation to the people to take a careful look at this, not to mention the people at the Pentagon."

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/FIRE-1%20[A].htm

"When Washburn, North Dakota’s town commissioners decided in January to take up the issue of whether or not to continue fluoridating the water supply for the town’s 1,300 residents, they anticipated researching the risks versus benefits and putting the matter to a vote.

What they didn’t anticipate — but soon encountered — was evidence of a coordinated effort by state actors and a national fluoride lobby group, using federal money, to crush local efforts by small towns like Washburn to stop fluoridating their water supplies."

[See the coordinated efforts being done in several states to prevent the public from stopping floride by the use of dirty tricks]:

https://www.renegadetribune.com/how-big-fluoride-tries-to-prevent-towns-from-cleaning-up-their-water/