Sign into an existing account

https://www.reuters.com/technology/plagiarism-machines-hollywood-writers-studios-battle-over-future-ai-2023-05-03/

These idiots claim "plagiarism" when nothing has been plagiarized. Nothing has been copied. They just lie and claim that they own everything that can ever be written.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/eu-proposes-exception-e-fuel-combustion-engines-2035-2023-03-21/

The European Commission has drafted a plan allowing sales of new cars with internal combustion engines that run only on climate neutral e-fuels, in an attempt to resolve a spat with Germany over the EU's phasing out of combustion engine cars from 2035.
The draft proposal, seen by Reuters, suggests creating a new type of vehicle category in the EU for cars that can only run on carbon neutral fuels.
Such vehicles would have to use technology that would prevent them from driving if other fuels are used, and this would include a "fuelling inducement system" to stop the car from starting if it was fueled by non-carbon neutral fuels, it said.

archieved: https://archive.fo/SzNPK

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/blast-heard-military-plant-irans-central-city-isfahan-state-media-2023-01-28/

Sorry for the MSM link, but this is actually real and it's been picked up by the major "news" sources. Read the article. The US and Israeli militaries conducted "exercises" shortly before this attack. I'm ambivalent about Iran, but I despise Israel and their flagrant disregard of state boundaries and proper military conduct, and the fact that the US gave the OK is despicable. It's very likely that Ukraine had knowledge of the attack. Something may very well happen from this.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-court-scrutinize-us-protections-social-media-2022-10-03/

Supreme Court to scrutinize U.S. protections for social media | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-court-scrutinize-us-protections-social-media-2022-10-03/
October 3, 2022 By Andrew Chung
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to federal protections for internet and social media companies freeing them of responsibility for content posted by users in a case involving an American student fatally shot in a 2015 rampage by Islamist militants in Paris.
The justices took up an appeal by the parents and other relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old woman from California who was studying in Paris, of a lower court's ruling that cleared Google LLC-owned YouTube of wrongdoing in a lawsuit seeking monetary damages that the family brought under a U.S. anti-terrorism law. Google and YouTube are part of Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O).
The Supreme Court also agreed to hear a separate appeal by Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) of the lower court's decision to revive a similar lawsuit against that company, though not on the basis of Section 230 ....

The Supreme Court and the internet's future, explained
https://web.archive.org/web/20221005124314mp_/https://theweek.com/supreme-court/1017215/the-supreme-court-and-the-internets-future-explained
https://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-internets-future-explained-094609268.html
Joel Mathis, October 5, 2022,
The Supreme Court is about to decide the future of the internet.
The court this week agreed to hear a case involving Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields internet providers from lawsuits over material posted online by users. The law "helped enable the rise of huge social networks like Facebook and Twitter," ...
"If the Supreme Court erodes Section 230 immunity, it could create a nightmare scenario not just for Big Tech but for anyone [who] runs a website with user-generated content," Axios notes. Legally speaking, then, the whole internet might be up for grabs.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-is-sued-by-drivers-over-alleged-false-autopilot-full-self-driving-claims-2022-09-14/?taid=632238a70e77c60001f76df1&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

Some days it seems like we're in this weird twilight zone where nearly all the information swirling around us is purely to sell products or movements, with truth not even being a factor.