Sign into an existing account

Magicians who could fool kings and bankers with their tricks are by nature, showmen.
Show people are, by and large, homos.
There is an elite cult of homo-magician-pedophiles running this entire world. They control everything.
They tricked the Rothschild and Bilderburger families.
They showed them the "impossible" and drew them in.
Fake. All fake.
Before CGI and deepfake, there were magicians.
Now they rule the world.
Even those rich jews fell for their slight of hand.

Natural Law of Virginity for Survival

Virginity, the state of never having engaged in sexual intercourse, is a natural law essential for emotional, physical, and societal survival. It fosters the instinct of intimacy and an "us vs. the world" bond, enabling "real love" that ensures stable relationships. In contrast, non-virgins pursue "bigger and better" partners, driven by transactional motives. If promiscuous sex aligned with natural or divine intent, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) would not exist, as their presence signals a deterrent to such behavior. Promiscuity erodes love, leads to deadly and incurable STDs, and risks "degenerate" offspring, while virgin parents produce healthier children. This article explores virginity as a survival mechanism, using scientific evidence and logical arguments.

Virginity and Emotional Survival

Virginity preserves the instinct of intimacy, fostering "real love" critical for emotional survival. Attachment theory shows that first sexual experiences release oxytocin, strengthening pair-bonding and creating a unified "us vs. the world" mindset (Feldman, 2012). Virgins, untainted by multiple partners, maintain this capacity, viewing their partner as a lifelong ally against external challenges. This bond ensures relationship stability, a cornerstone of emotional well-being. Cultural traditions worldwide uphold virginity as a foundation for fidelity, contrasting with non-virgins’ tendency to prioritize fleeting partner advantages.

Promiscuity’s Threat to Survival

Promiscuous sex—frequent sexual activity with multiple partners—undermines emotional survival by eroding intimacy and the instinct of love. Studies suggest repeated sexual encounters with different partners may desensitize bonding mechanisms, reducing deep connection (Archives of Sexual Behavior, Haselton & Buss, 2000). This loss parallels veterans trained to kill, who lose self-control due to trauma. PTSD research indicates that exposure to violence impairs impulse control, leading some veterans to commit crimes, such as killing over minor bar disputes (Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2015). Similarly, non-virgins lose the "self-containment control" of intimacy, becoming impulsive or transactional, threatening relationship survival.

STDs and Physical Survival
The existence of STDs confirms that promiscuity violates natural law; if intended, such diseases would not threaten survival. All STDs are potentially deadly, with bacterial infections (e.g., syphilis, chlamydia) causing immediate harm and viral infections (e.g., HSV, HIV, HBV, HPV) acting as "time bombs" that remain asymptomatic for years before triggering cancer or organ failure (CDC, 2023). Viral STDs are incurable, persisting in the body with recurring symptoms. For example, HSV causes lifelong genital sore outbreaks, managed with antivirals, while HIV requires lifelong antiretroviral therapy to delay AIDS (,).

Even treated, these infections shorten lifespan through complications like liver cancer (HBV) or cervical cancer (HPV) (). Congenital effects further jeopardize survival: syphilis can cause bone deformities in newborns, and chlamydia can lead to neonatal conjunctivitis or pneumonia, supporting the claim that parents with STDs produce "degenerate" offspring (,). Virgin parents, free of STD exposure, are hypothesized to produce mentally and physically healthier children, ensuring generational survival, though direct evidence is limited.

Relationship Dynamics and Societal Survival

Non-virgins often engage in transactional relationships, per social exchange theory, undermining societal survival through unstable partnerships (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959). Intelligent couples may endure for practical benefits (e.g., a male’s repair skills or a female’s cooking), while less intelligent couples rely on sexual satisfaction, splitting when it fades or a "better" partner appears. Low-IQ individuals are prone to repeated divorces, failing to understand cause-and-effect dynamics. Decision-making studies show lower cognitive ability correlates with impulsive choices, destabilizing families and communities (Gottfredson, 1997).

Conclusion
Virginity is a natural law for survival, preserving the instinct of intimacy and enabling "real love" that ensures emotional stability. Promiscuity violates this law, eroding love akin to veterans losing self-control after trauma, and exposing individuals to deadly, incurable STDs that threaten physical survival and produce "degenerate" offspring. Non-virgins’ transactional relationships and low-IQ-driven divorces destabilize society, while virgin parents, free of STDs, are hypothesized to foster healthier generations. Mass media, influenced by "mentally degenerate" narratives, obscure these truths, but evidence underscores virginity’s role in human survival.

References

CDC. (2023). Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Data and Statistics.

WHO. (2024). Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs).

Feldman, R. (2012). Oxytocin and social affiliation in humans. Hormones and Behavior.

Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters. Intelligence.

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups.

Journal of Traumatic Stress. (2015). PTSD and impulsivity in veterans.

The Smurfs: Perverting Children’s Minds

Plot Summary of The Smurfs

The Smurfs is a Belgian comic franchise created by Pierre Culliford (Peyo) in 1958, featuring a village of small, blue, humanoid creatures living in a forest. The Smurfs are depicted as a utopian community, each with distinct traits (e.g., Brainy, Handy, Papa Smurf).

Notably, the village is exclusively male, with over 100 male Smurfs coexisting harmoniously. The sole female, Smurfette, was created later by the villain Gargamel as a deceptive tool but was transformed into a "real" Smurf by Papa Smurf.

Smurfette becomes the object of affection for nearly all male Smurfs, who frequently vie for her attention, like the lone village whore, creating a dynamic where she is the singular female in a male-dominated society, resembling an unhealthy and unnatural relational structure.

About Peyo (Pierre Culliford)

Pierre Culliford, known as Peyo, was born in 1928 in Schaerbeek, Brussels, to an English father and Belgian mother. He trained at the Académie Royale des Beaux-Arts and worked briefly in animation before becoming a renowned comics artist, creating Johan and Peewit and its spin-off, The Smurfs.

Peyo married Nine Culliford in 1952, and they had two children, Véronique and Thierry, who later managed the Smurfs’ branding and narrative development. There is no documented evidence in available sources suggesting personal dysfunctions such as bisexuality or other psychological abnormalities in Peyo’s life.

In the absence of such evidence, it is plausible that Peyo, like the controversial psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, may have been commissioned or influenced to embed subversive themes in his work to manipulate young minds. Freud, notorious for claims like the Oedipus complex (men desiring their mothers), penis envy (women’s supposed fixation on male anatomy), and interpreting cigar smoking as a latent homosexual desire, was labeled a charlatan by contemporaries like psychiatrist Karl Popper, who criticized his unscientific methods.

Similarly, Peyo’s creation of a male-dominated Smurf village with a single, objectified whore alike female could reflect an intentional or subconscious agenda to distort children’s perceptions of gender and relationships.

The Psychological Danger of The Smurfs

Beneath the vibrant colors and whimsical charm of The Smurfs lies a troubling narrative that may pose significant risks to children’s psychological development. The franchise, with its masterfully crafted characters designed to captivate young audiences, appears to pervert normal social and relational dynamics, potentially functioning as a psychological operation (psy-op) to influence impressionable minds.

The deliberate appeal of the Smurfs—cute, expressive, and relatable—targets children’s natural affinity for anthropomorphic characters, as supported by developmental psychology research. According to a 2017 study in Frontiers in Psychology, children are drawn to anthropomorphic characters because they mirror human emotions, fostering emotional attachment (Geerdts, 2017).

This attachment can dull critical thinking, causing children to overlook the abnormal social structure of the Smurf village. The most glaring abnormality is the gender imbalance: an all-male village with Smurfette as the sole female, positioned as the object of universal male desire.

This dynamic mirrors an unhealthy relational model, where Smurfette’s role resembles that of a “village whore,” a figure relentlessly pursued by the male Smurfs. Such a portrayal risks normalizing skewed gender dynamics for children, who are particularly susceptible to media influences during their formative years.

Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development (1936) highlights that children aged 2–7, the primary audience for The Smurfs, are in the preoperational stage, where they struggle to critically analyze symbolic content. This makes them vulnerable to internalizing the Smurfs’ unnatural social structure as normal.

Impact on Children’s Social Development

The Smurfs’ male-dominated world may encourage children to emulate its behaviors, particularly in play. Research in Child Development (Maccoby, 1988) shows that children often segregate by gender in play, but media exposure can amplify this tendency.

By presenting a society where males dominate and females are tokenized, The Smurfs may reinforce male-only social groups, discouraging boys from engaging with female peers. This lack of early cross-gender interaction can impair the development of social skills necessary for healthy relationships.

A 2014 study in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships found that early socialization patterns significantly predict adult relational competence (Collins & van Dulmen, 2014). Boys who emulate the Smurfs’ male-centric behavior may struggle to form balanced relationships with women in adulthood, potentially contributing to the “incel” (involuntary celibate) phenomenon, where men feel alienated from romantic partnerships due to inadequate social skills.

Intentional Design or Mental Impairment?

The Smurfs’ creator, Peyo, either crafted this dynamic with deliberate intent or operated from a flawed psychological perspective. The meticulous design of the Smurfs—bright colors, distinct personalities, and childlike voices—aligns with psychological principles of appeal, as noted in Media Psychology (Hoffner, 2008), which discusses how likable characters influence children’s values.

This suggests a calculated effort to make the abnormal social structure palatable, potentially as a psy-op to normalize dysfunctional gender dynamics. Alternatively, Peyo’s creation of a nearly all-male world with a single, objectified female could reflect a personal bias or psychological limitation, projecting an unhealthy worldview onto a children’s medium, akin to Freud’s discredited theories.

Conclusion

The Smurfs may seem like innocent entertainment, but its underlying structure poses serious risks to children’s psychological and social development. By presenting a male-dominated society with a single female as the focus of desire, it perverts healthy relational models, potentially fostering gender segregation in childhood play and contributing to social dysfunction in adulthood, such as incel tendencies.

The franchise’s appeal, rooted in psychological principles, makes it particularly insidious, lulling children’s critical faculties while embedding abnormal social norms. Parents and educators must critically evaluate such media to protect young minds from its subtle but dangerous influence.

Sources

Geerdts, M. S. (2017). Anthropomorphic media and children’s social understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1477.

Piaget, J. (1936). The Origins of Intelligence in Children.

Maccoby, E. E. (1988). Gender as a social category. Child Development, 59(6), 1261–1265.

Collins, W. A., & van Dulmen, M. (2014). Friendship and romantic relationships in emerging adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(4), 456–469.

Hoffner, C. (2008). Parasocial relationships and media. Media Psychology, 11(3), 399–422.