Try making your own movie sometime. It's more powerful than a nuke if you can retain an audience. If one were inclined, they could make a bunch of Hitler Was Right movies and the thought could catch on. However...
You run into a real problem with copyrights, namely "likeness" in addition to a myriad of organizations that ensure only kikes get he privilege. That was its intended purpose, to ensnare any rogue movie makers from taking off. Almost any kind of music can be attacked with copyright infringement suits to stifle your production - even if you literally write the shit yourself. That's why "likeness" is so prominent, they know they can dig something up to match whatever you produce.
Even in the news you see the political agenda at play. Look at the Gabby Petino case. The (((news))) this morning was "having a discussion" about why the family wasn't talking to police. The "expert" was sure to emphasize that there's NO OBLIGATION TO HELP IN THIS CASE. Setting the precedent of course, for undermining the constitution. They want the masses to feel OUTRAGED that there's no justice for this poor, cute, blonde girl whom we only see kissing the boyfriend who they've absolutely no proof did it. [Enter the cutsie selfie loop x50 per segment]
Run that story 50-100 times a day for about a month... Aaaaaand boom, they're introducing laws forbidding right to remain silent. Rinse and repeat till the constitution is dead. I always ask, why THIS case? Of the MILLIONS out there, why does THIS ONE get all the attention?
The answer obviously, is aesthetics; even niggers don't care about missing niggers. They're marketing to the largest amount of people they can get, using the most desirable demographic.
Yuri Bezmenov was right. Listen to his speech wih headphones while watching the news - it becomes a documentary.
You are so full of shit. It's no wonder you fear my archiving the chat because you never know when your own words will come back to bite you.
> This place is like OG Voat
Not even close, Puttitout never acted like a petulant child, telling users to delete their accounts or kill themselves.
> and voat had porn and other content that some feel is questionable. Some users are apparently touting SearchVoat as an alternate but they allow "Pedo" content and even label it as such.
Except one thing, that tag exists yet there's not one post that bears it. Your pedobuddy Blumen4alles just joined, so let's see what he does with it. Difference is, it won't show up in /all/new by default, and he doesn't have a corrupt admin to protect him there.
> If it's legal it's allowed, there and here.
IE whatever YOU decide can stay.
> I don't want someone to curate my content, I will do that as I please.
You're an admin, you have that privilege.
> Allowing some content but not others is a slippery slope that many don't want to go down.
By slippery slope, did you mean how I got banned for speaking against it? And how you claimed the whistle blower was "acting in bad faith"? Citing "drama" shouldn't be tolerated? Or how you conveniently waited till I was banned and couldn't respond to say those things?
> Here's part of my comment last night when pinged: "The freedoms we have in this country are precious yet they are being eroded every day. I may not like what B4A has to say/post but so long as it's legal (and every post has been or we have deleted it), I support @System in his intent to keep this site as free from content censorship as possible. Now stop feeding the troll, block him if you cannot look past it, let us know if there's something that might be illegal, and be grateful we have a place to speak and post freely."
Kek. Yet when it was me, you supported my ban for mere criticism. I maintain still, you are a lying hypocritical cunt. People are starting to wake up to this fact with Venerable, but you're slyly trying to fly under the radar. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten about you.
> I wish everyone well should they choose not to stay.
So you'll be surrounded by only your cronies who stroke your fragile egos...
When I started, I had no audience. Look at me now, you can't shut up about me. I am in your thoughts and fears with every post. You chose the path of the wicked.
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
China has food?
/v/FatPeopleHate viewpost?postid=614c3249967df
Antiliberalsociety 2 points 2.6 years ago
Degeneracy through comedy is how it all starts.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=614c78fd49ff8
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
Isn't that Johnny Knoxville? The dude taking rocket dildos up the ass for keks?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614b2387d070a
Antiliberalsociety 2 points 2.6 years ago
Alt confirmed
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614acb249d9d8
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
Download them because the archive disappears regularly
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=614adda27772b
Antiliberalsociety 3 points 2.6 years ago
How could a 2 week old account know what the entire site hates?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614acb249d9d8
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
He's white
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614a97495dd47
Antiliberalsociety 2 points 2.6 years ago
This site's admins do not appreciate your obsession with exposing their buddy.
> I built a better site, get fucked.
- https://files.catbox.moe/utfjwz.jpg
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614acb249d9d8
Antiliberalsociety 4 points 2.6 years ago
Concur
https://files.catbox.moe/y3q02o.JPG
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614acb249d9d8
Antiliberalsociety 3 points 2.6 years ago
> 2 weeks
> I get we all
Not even trying anymore
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614acb249d9d8
Antiliberalsociety 2 points 2.6 years ago
[Concur](https://archive.org/details/johnny-rebel/Johnny+Rebel/Johnny+Rebel+-+For+Segregationists+Only/03.+Johnny+Rebel+-+Nigger+hating+me.mp3)
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=614adda27772b
Antiliberalsociety 9 points 2.6 years ago
She can't say that to diversity, that's privilegeist.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614b2387d070a
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
Objects worshiped by open border liberals
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614a1f2602d4c
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
Interesting, but fucking name them already.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=614a1870d55f3
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
Wouldn't work because the Deathly Hollows were pro-race mixing. The Death Eaters were portrayed as being homogeneous.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614a1f2602d4c
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago
Link still doesn't work, all the other ones do though.
/v/SouthAfrica viewpost?postid=614a2651dbb8c
Antiliberalsociety 1 point 2.6 years ago*
Try making your own movie sometime. It's more powerful than a nuke if you can retain an audience. If one were inclined, they could make a bunch of Hitler Was Right movies and the thought could catch on. However...
You run into a real problem with copyrights, namely "likeness" in addition to a myriad of organizations that ensure only kikes get he privilege. That was its intended purpose, to ensnare any rogue movie makers from taking off. Almost any kind of music can be attacked with copyright infringement suits to stifle your production - even if you literally write the shit yourself. That's why "likeness" is so prominent, they know they can dig something up to match whatever you produce.
Even in the news you see the political agenda at play. Look at the Gabby Petino case. The (((news))) this morning was "having a discussion" about why the family wasn't talking to police. The "expert" was sure to emphasize that there's NO OBLIGATION TO HELP IN THIS CASE. Setting the precedent of course, for undermining the constitution. They want the masses to feel OUTRAGED that there's no justice for this poor, cute, blonde girl whom we only see kissing the boyfriend who they've absolutely no proof did it. [Enter the cutsie selfie loop x50 per segment]
Run that story 50-100 times a day for about a month... Aaaaaand boom, they're introducing laws forbidding right to remain silent. Rinse and repeat till the constitution is dead. I always ask, why THIS case? Of the MILLIONS out there, why does THIS ONE get all the attention?
The answer obviously, is aesthetics; even niggers don't care about missing niggers. They're marketing to the largest amount of people they can get, using the most desirable demographic.
Yuri Bezmenov was right. Listen to his speech wih headphones while watching the news - it becomes a documentary.
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=6149402727e07
Antiliberalsociety 12 points 2.6 years ago
Notice that the comments on lamestream sites are becoming more & more based? That's no coincidence.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=6149ad589d617
Antiliberalsociety 3 points 2.6 years ago
The only Russian with a British accent
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=61490877d3492
Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.6 years ago
Hypocrite ^
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614761cb2be82
Antiliberalsociety -1 points 2.6 years ago
TIL blumen4pedos is gay
/v/politics viewpost?postid=6147ce27ccb75
Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.6 years ago
That goes double for you, pedofuck.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614761cb2be82
Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.6 years ago
I was referencing the anon post, it reads like something GP would say.
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=61478fdb64578
Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.6 years ago*
You are so full of shit. It's no wonder you fear my archiving the chat because you never know when your own words will come back to bite you.
> This place is like OG Voat
Not even close, Puttitout never acted like a petulant child, telling users to delete their accounts or kill themselves.
> and voat had porn and other content that some feel is questionable. Some users are apparently touting SearchVoat as an alternate but they allow "Pedo" content and even label it as such.
Except one thing, that tag exists yet there's not one post that bears it. Your pedobuddy Blumen4alles just joined, so let's see what he does with it. Difference is, it won't show up in /all/new by default, and he doesn't have a corrupt admin to protect him there.
> If it's legal it's allowed, there and here.
IE whatever YOU decide can stay.
> I don't want someone to curate my content, I will do that as I please.
You're an admin, you have that privilege.
> Allowing some content but not others is a slippery slope that many don't want to go down.
By slippery slope, did you mean how I got banned for speaking against it? And how you claimed the whistle blower was "acting in bad faith"? Citing "drama" shouldn't be tolerated? Or how you conveniently waited till I was banned and couldn't respond to say those things?
> Here's part of my comment last night when pinged: "The freedoms we have in this country are precious yet they are being eroded every day. I may not like what B4A has to say/post but so long as it's legal (and every post has been or we have deleted it), I support @System in his intent to keep this site as free from content censorship as possible. Now stop feeding the troll, block him if you cannot look past it, let us know if there's something that might be illegal, and be grateful we have a place to speak and post freely."
Kek. Yet when it was me, you supported my ban for mere criticism. I maintain still, you are a lying hypocritical cunt. People are starting to wake up to this fact with Venerable, but you're slyly trying to fly under the radar. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten about you.
> I wish everyone well should they choose not to stay.
So you'll be surrounded by only your cronies who stroke your fragile egos...
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614761cb2be82
Antiliberalsociety 0 points 2.6 years ago
When I started, I had no audience. Look at me now, you can't shut up about me. I am in your thoughts and fears with every post. You chose the path of the wicked.
https://files.catbox.moe/xc78ak.GIF
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=614761cb2be82