×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate


GoldenAgeWhen
Member for: 4.1 years

scp: 35 (+39/-4)
ccp: 2023 (+2083/-60)
votes given: 3157 (+3034/-123)
score: 2058





Trophies

In the degenerate's body language you can clearly see that he cares about blacks being aborted.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62fc147ad9d1a

Destroying the west, what don't you understand?

None of this is to help anything but to destroy good things and rule over it.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62fc7aeb03518

I know you are joking, but this would force the point of "what to do if ballots are bad". When they find huge issues with elections they always say "oh well, election is over". a fire in a drop box would be primarily anti-populist votes assuming trump or desantis (and i know they are fake, but we are talking about normie-think) and it would be newsworthy and wouldn't likely be removed from the cycle.


/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=62fc1c518070c

I love the guy who goes around downvoting everything that mentions boomers being boomers. Does he really think that some 30 year old: 1. Owns a printer, 2. Uses a printer, 3. Prints shit like this out. 4. Would take a picture of the print out rather than screenshot or use the file?


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62fb1f34b4d6a

People over 40 who consume programming (fox, msnbc, npr, cnn, woke shows, college courses, etc.) also feel that way. You will have a poet telling a statistician that they are wrong about climate change (or whatever) because they "know" it.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62fb1f34b4d6a

I think the delta fluctuates. For a while Americans were better, then "something happened" and we went downhill. Europe is now fighting us to the bottom of the hill though, so I wouldn't say they are better at the moment.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62fb1f34b4d6a

while boomers are less worthless than those after (as a whole) they are still pretty worthless.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62fb1f34b4d6a

Remuxing to mkv might be worth trying.


/v/movies viewpost?postid=62faf27fcae88

"in the murder of Yolanda N'Gaojia"

Didn't stand a chance


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62facf5e93dbf

I hate how short modern swings are


/v/oldgoats viewpost?postid=62faca0901fa6

Since when do we control police and judicial in cities?


/v/CovidWorldOrder viewpost?postid=62f5f4be00da1

Fuck trump, i would like to see people tried and hanged for rr and waco.


/v/CovidWorldOrder viewpost?postid=62f5f4be00da1

There is no "law of thermodynamics"...

And how do you think it happened if it wasn't the scientific method? Some guy wrote it down and said "I am the science" and everyone took him at his word?


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d12652a5c

Until i hear more from a trusted data set i would say it "spread through contact" just like aids can; it can happen but not likely.


/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=62f440e164494

I preferred blue the jew to drawing stars on them.


/v/Jews viewpost?postid=62f40ca39aa68

it is because no one asks them to define anything. They control the language, this is true, but it is through the omission of logic and definitions. It allows them to change the goal posts and the discussion without showing anything.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d12652a5c

"freedom, you know, anal sex with children"


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d12652a5c

There needs to be a rule that if someone would like to use a word they must be able to define it on request.

In this case I would like to know how "science" is defined. To me it would be "The study of something using the Scientific Method". which is slightly circular but the Method is pretty well defined and I don't think anyone disagrees.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d12652a5c

regardless, the input needs to be parameterized


/v/Screenshot viewpost?postid=62f387a4a1de7

All they need to do is put in if statements. AI takes in normalized input, during this normalization the user can inject whatever they want, for example, "rape=0.5 x murder" or something. Using this they could the leftist thing and say that black crime isn't actually real crime, people who appear to have low iqs actually have higher dark-iqs and so on.

AI is just logical, it might be able to "see" a picture, but the input is just coordinates and values.


/v/Screenshot viewpost?postid=62f387a4a1de7

I only see the VHS on geeks. What indexer?


/v/movies viewpost?postid=62f2dec013d22

Racist isn't a thing unless it means that you believe race plays a role in different traits. The other logical meaning would be that you think things about people irrationally based on race (similar to phobia).

The first meaning should apply to anyone with an iq over 80, and many below that. If it doesn't it means that they are brainwashed and suffering from mental illness ("I don't see race" boomers / christcucks).

Leftists absolutely fall into the second category when they see every white person as something they aren't, and attribute qualities to other races that they do not possess.

Anyway, the meaning most people use is illogical and could not have been created organically. So it should be dismissed. As has been pointed out, no one ever, even the "worst" whites, ever said "I really hate having the black people (or jewish people, or latinos, or arabs, or pakis, or ...) around because of their dark skin".


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f2791e32846

The idea of private companies vetting food is a good one. Kosher and halal are not ours, but i would love something similar.

I distrust the FDA/usda more than i distrust a service jews provide for other jews.


/v/Jews viewpost?postid=62f28ecb1cec1