Amalgamate; verb - "to unite into one"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/amalgamate aka US aka United States aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Nature doesn't unite together...it separates each UNIT apart from ONE another. Few rebranded "compound" into "unity" to mix many together by inverting reality with fiction, and to establish compound interest aka inter (internal) esse (essence).
a) Wealth/wele - "well being"...hence the jewish poisoning of gentile wells/wealth.
b) Measuring in suggested percentages tempts one to ignore being the evaluation (perception) within moving value (perceivable).
c) Gentiles represent the life-stock of each jew when participating in the market aka buying by consent into what others sell by suggestion, hence marking themselves.
d) A potential (life) within a procession (inception towards death) cannot take anything into possession (to own) without ignoring reality for fiction.
Both inception of life and death of life imply "naked", hence bare (life) necessity (inception towards death).
A jew remains free to deny, as long as gentiles willing get caught in the world wide web of suggested admissions.
> claimed; investigated; obtained; verified
Were there gentiles involved in any of those?
> admission
Instead of that; consider chutzpah, which Leo Calvin Rosten once described as: "that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan."
It's about setting something up; not for the outcome; but to get away with however it turns out.
Everything (perceivable) moves each thing (perception) apart from one another...gentiles consenting to jewish suggestions affixes the suggested within the consenting ones mind.
Nature moves sound...a jew suggests artificial words, shaped within sound, to tempt gentiles to hold onto definitions, hence define; verb - "to fix". Fixing words aka spell-craft aka idols/ideals within ones mind shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN, hence deaf to phonics (sound).
Trying to fix everything implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) and mosaic law aka putting the mosaic back together piece by piece...it tempts ones mind into an immovable state aka ones mind ignoring to be (life) moved (inception towards death).
> love...
...binds one into a perpetual conflict against hate. This conflict is called "reason".
> shooting a jew
Gentiles bind themselves willingly to temptations suggested by each jew...killing a jew doesn't address the issue of mass willingness to fall for temptations aka mass ignorance of the natural need to resist wanted temptations.
Gentiles ignoring nature...naturally establishes the artificial supplier of temptations aka a jew.
Flow (inception towards death) separates form (life) from one another...joining inverts that, while turning life towards death, hence...Venture; verb - "to hazard the loss (of something), run a risk, risk one's life".
a) Chat; verb - "talk idly; babble; converse with one another"...chatting ain't free; it's binding.
b) GPT aka "Generative Pre-trained Transformer"...being implies generative (inception towards death) transformation (life) without any training before.
c) Being implies T within G...others P (pee) in-between...if one consents to it.
Advertisement implies turning the mind towards, hence from light (discernment) towards darkness (ignorance).
> tech
Technology aka tekhnē (artifice) and logy (logic/reason) implies turning ones mind from natural (perception) towards artificial (suggestion), and thereby against each other within conflicts of reason.
> I will not
Both egoism (I) and nihilism (not) corrupt ones free will of choice if consented to.
> try to sell it to me
You are selling yourself out to another by buying into what another suggests. Why? Because artificially buying and selling tempts one to ignore ones natural FREE will of choice.
Flower implies flow...not a turning of form. To invite implies being within (in) before being able to pursue (vite/weie) anything else. Pollination implies a transfer of pollen (poll) within (in) action (ation).
Only within a straight line (inception towards death) can one (life) turn; rotate; revolve; move about an axis etc. Turning (circular logic) tempts one to ignore thinking straight.
> Some predators look inviting to get their prey.
Before a predator can get; a prey has to take the suggested temptation of looking/locking, while giving invitation to the predator. Furthermore...ignoring to resist temptation selects others as predator by making oneself the prey.
Predator vs prey tempts one to ignore that nature forces hunger through each...the former implies turning against each other, while the latter implies being (life) straightened (inception towards death) apart from one another.
Hunger forces adaptation by free will of choice...it's ones choice to respond to hunger by eating (predator) another (prey).
> Nature does advertise
Ad (towards) vert (to turn)...nature moves towards (does towards re-does); artifice turns those within against each other (does vs doesn't).
First nature does; then each being within responds to what nature does, hence re-doing aka revitalization aka regeneration aka reformation etc. Turning against each other tempts both sides to ignore self sustenance.
a) Argument implies an arguing mind aka circular logic within self, turning into conflicts of reason against others. What I described implies a straight passage from inception towards death, for each bending life within aka light bending rays apart from one another.
b) Valid; adjective - "having force in law, legally binding"...natural law forces adaptation from each being within, which requires each ones "free" will of choice. It's consenting to suggested laws which binds one to others, thereby invalidating ones free will of choice.
c) Nature can neither be delayed nor stopped...it's each being within that has the free will of choice to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), thereby pretending to stop mentally, which delays physical adaptation.
d) AND (living implies dying) OR (living implies the alternation within the process of dying)
e) Motion generates momentum (inception towards death) for matter (life)...inevitability refers to motion, not to the stopping or delaying of momentum by the matter within.
In other words...trying to stop or delay death implies child (matter) shaping within mother (momentum) while ignoring father (motion), hence life not not being able to perceive its own inception and death.
Only within energy (internal power) can there be action (inception towards death) and reactions (life)...no matter how one re-acts; energy cannot be stopped.
Stop (cessation of motion) implies ones ignorance/denial of being moved. Stop isn't an obstruction of reality; but ones obstruction of self with fiction (suggested information), while ignoring reality (perceivable inspiration).
Origin moves all perceivable moves straight through each ones perception; suggested turns one towards outcome aka ad-vertere. To turn from perceivable towards suggested implies selling self out by buying into what another offers.
In other words...nature doesn't advertise; turning from natural towards artificial implies advertisement.
b) Being implies in-between left/right + up/down + front/back aka within a cube aka square position with angular perspective. Logic circles that square...until one escapes the net (net-s-cape) aka that which binds ones free will of choice, hence net/ned - "to bind".
c) Brave implies bold/bhel - "to swell", hence into a ball/ba'al, which also ties to browse/bhreus - "to swell".
> circles instead of crosses
Being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death)...the suggested circle of life (logic) tempts one to ignore that.
Suggested catch-phrases utilizing frequency of repetition to ensnare consent. Phrase/phrasis - "diction" hence a jew utilizing phraseology to tempt gentiles to consent to dictatorship by jew.
No word about deputizing Americans to strengthen the core of resistance to government overreach...instead it's always about perpetuating a conflict of reason (citizen vs non-citizen) among the many by poking both sides in return for a paycheck by few.
Light brings states within (rays) apart from one another...uniting states together casts shadows over each other. A challenge can only happen within shadows.
a) Wanting to keep tempts one to ignore needing to let go.
b) Reaching for suggested prevents perception from rising within perceivable
c) To exclaim a point (!) implies ones expressing life sentence trying to claim point of death.
Why are these the first thoughts in my mind when reading "keep reaching!"?
The worship of the word "We." When men accepted that worship, the structure of centuries collapsed about them, the structure whose every beam had come from the thought of some one man, each in his day down the ages, from the depth of some one spirit, such spirit as existed but for its own sake.
Those men who survived those eager to obey, eager to live for one another, since they had nothing else to vindicate them-those men could neither carry on, nor preserve what they had received. Thus did all thought, all science, all wisdom perish on earth. Thus did men - men with nothing to offer save their great number - lost the steel towers, the flying ships, the power wires, all the things they had not created and could never keep.
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeks ago
Occupied Kaiserslautern...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiserslautern_Military_Community ...
- https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AV8fSHq.png
...hence masonic fuss-ba'al aka Ba'al Zabub (beelzebub) aka jewish Baʿal zəvuv (Lord of the Flies).
/v/news viewpost?postid=67f3daedd3b3d
ImplicationOverReason 10 points 3 weeks ago
Masonic Tell-a-Vision...
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67f35ff772b6b
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 3 weeks ago
Amalgamate; verb - "to unite into one"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/amalgamate aka US aka United States aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Nature doesn't unite together...it separates each UNIT apart from ONE another. Few rebranded "compound" into "unity" to mix many together by inverting reality with fiction, and to establish compound interest aka inter (internal) esse (essence).
/v/WordOfTheDay viewpost?postid=67f2a6972d105
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeks ago
a) Wealth/wele - "well being"...hence the jewish poisoning of gentile wells/wealth.
b) Measuring in suggested percentages tempts one to ignore being the evaluation (perception) within moving value (perceivable).
c) Gentiles represent the life-stock of each jew when participating in the market aka buying by consent into what others sell by suggestion, hence marking themselves.
d) A potential (life) within a procession (inception towards death) cannot take anything into possession (to own) without ignoring reality for fiction.
Both inception of life and death of life imply "naked", hence bare (life) necessity (inception towards death).
/v/Business viewpost?postid=67f227b29af20
ImplicationOverReason 3 points 3 weeks ago
> had to admit it because they got caught
A jew remains free to deny, as long as gentiles willing get caught in the world wide web of suggested admissions.
> claimed; investigated; obtained; verified
Were there gentiles involved in any of those?
> admission
Instead of that; consider chutzpah, which Leo Calvin Rosten once described as: "that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan."
It's about setting something up; not for the outcome; but to get away with however it turns out.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67f1ca4e25ebf
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeks ago
> What will fix everything?
Everything (perceivable) moves each thing (perception) apart from one another...gentiles consenting to jewish suggestions affixes the suggested within the consenting ones mind.
Nature moves sound...a jew suggests artificial words, shaped within sound, to tempt gentiles to hold onto definitions, hence define; verb - "to fix". Fixing words aka spell-craft aka idols/ideals within ones mind shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN, hence deaf to phonics (sound).
Trying to fix everything implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) and mosaic law aka putting the mosaic back together piece by piece...it tempts ones mind into an immovable state aka ones mind ignoring to be (life) moved (inception towards death).
> love...
...binds one into a perpetual conflict against hate. This conflict is called "reason".
> shooting a jew
Gentiles bind themselves willingly to temptations suggested by each jew...killing a jew doesn't address the issue of mass willingness to fall for temptations aka mass ignorance of the natural need to resist wanted temptations.
Gentiles ignoring nature...naturally establishes the artificial supplier of temptations aka a jew.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67f13f434c2cc
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 3 weeks ago
> to form joint venture
Flow (inception towards death) separates form (life) from one another...joining inverts that, while turning life towards death, hence...Venture; verb - "to hazard the loss (of something), run a risk, risk one's life".
/v/Business viewpost?postid=67ef9a7a012d3
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 3 weeks ago
a) Fine/fin - "end"...yet the fines continue.
b) Fine; noun - "unblemished, refined, pure, free of impurities"...yet fines are used to blame for impurities, while binding others to pay.
/v/Business viewpost?postid=67ef9c894dddf
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 3 weeks ago
a) Chat; verb - "talk idly; babble; converse with one another"...chatting ain't free; it's binding.
b) GPT aka "Generative Pre-trained Transformer"...being implies generative (inception towards death) transformation (life) without any training before.
c) Being implies T within G...others P (pee) in-between...if one consents to it.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=67ef9a2873718
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 3 weeks ago
> to showcase a nigger in advertising
Advertisement implies turning the mind towards, hence from light (discernment) towards darkness (ignorance).
> tech
Technology aka tekhnē (artifice) and logy (logic/reason) implies turning ones mind from natural (perception) towards artificial (suggestion), and thereby against each other within conflicts of reason.
> I will not
Both egoism (I) and nihilism (not) corrupt ones free will of choice if consented to.
> try to sell it to me
You are selling yourself out to another by buying into what another suggests. Why? Because artificially buying and selling tempts one to ignore ones natural FREE will of choice.
/v/Rants viewpost?postid=67ef3faf4c288
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeks ago
> Flowers invite bees for pollination
Flower implies flow...not a turning of form. To invite implies being within (in) before being able to pursue (vite/weie) anything else. Pollination implies a transfer of pollen (poll) within (in) action (ation).
Only within a straight line (inception towards death) can one (life) turn; rotate; revolve; move about an axis etc. Turning (circular logic) tempts one to ignore thinking straight.
> Some predators look inviting to get their prey.
Before a predator can get; a prey has to take the suggested temptation of looking/locking, while giving invitation to the predator. Furthermore...ignoring to resist temptation selects others as predator by making oneself the prey.
Predator vs prey tempts one to ignore that nature forces hunger through each...the former implies turning against each other, while the latter implies being (life) straightened (inception towards death) apart from one another.
Hunger forces adaptation by free will of choice...it's ones choice to respond to hunger by eating (predator) another (prey).
> Nature does advertise
Ad (towards) vert (to turn)...nature moves towards (does towards re-does); artifice turns those within against each other (does vs doesn't).
First nature does; then each being within responds to what nature does, hence re-doing aka revitalization aka regeneration aka reformation etc. Turning against each other tempts both sides to ignore self sustenance.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67eeb4cda45e4
ImplicationOverReason -2 points 4 weeks ago
a) Argument implies an arguing mind aka circular logic within self, turning into conflicts of reason against others. What I described implies a straight passage from inception towards death, for each bending life within aka light bending rays apart from one another.
b) Valid; adjective - "having force in law, legally binding"...natural law forces adaptation from each being within, which requires each ones "free" will of choice. It's consenting to suggested laws which binds one to others, thereby invalidating ones free will of choice.
c) Nature can neither be delayed nor stopped...it's each being within that has the free will of choice to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), thereby pretending to stop mentally, which delays physical adaptation.
d) AND (living implies dying) OR (living implies the alternation within the process of dying)
e) Motion generates momentum (inception towards death) for matter (life)...inevitability refers to motion, not to the stopping or delaying of momentum by the matter within.
In other words...trying to stop or delay death implies child (matter) shaping within mother (momentum) while ignoring father (motion), hence life not not being able to perceive its own inception and death.
Only within energy (internal power) can there be action (inception towards death) and reactions (life)...no matter how one re-acts; energy cannot be stopped.
Stop (cessation of motion) implies ones ignorance/denial of being moved. Stop isn't an obstruction of reality; but ones obstruction of self with fiction (suggested information), while ignoring reality (perceivable inspiration).
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67eeb4cda45e4
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 4 weeks ago
a) Pay-ment (to appease mind) for ad-vertise-ment (turning mind towards) aka inversion by temptation.
b) Roblox... https://img.gvid.tv/i/273QHWSP.png + Robust (ro) Blocks (blox) aka blocking strength.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=67eeb42be4436
ImplicationOverReason -2 points 4 weeks ago
There can be (life) only one way (inception towards death)...others advertise artificial alternatives for the only natural way of life.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67eeb4cda45e4
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 weeks ago
Origin moves all perceivable moves straight through each ones perception; suggested turns one towards outcome aka ad-vertere. To turn from perceivable towards suggested implies selling self out by buying into what another offers.
In other words...nature doesn't advertise; turning from natural towards artificial implies advertisement.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67eeb4cda45e4
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 4 weeks ago
a) Circle logos aka circular logic.
b) Being implies in-between left/right + up/down + front/back aka within a cube aka square position with angular perspective. Logic circles that square...until one escapes the net (net-s-cape) aka that which binds ones free will of choice, hence net/ned - "to bind".
c) Brave implies bold/bhel - "to swell", hence into a ball/ba'al, which also ties to browse/bhreus - "to swell".
> circles instead of crosses
Being (life) moved A CROSS (inception towards death)...the suggested circle of life (logic) tempts one to ignore that.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=67ee8f2babc0f
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 4 weeks ago
Daughters reactions? Too cold!
/v/funny viewpost?postid=67ee818354600
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 weeks ago
> interracial; cuckold; bbc
Suggested catch-phrases utilizing frequency of repetition to ensnare consent. Phrase/phrasis - "diction" hence a jew utilizing phraseology to tempt gentiles to consent to dictatorship by jew.
/v/AnonWhatever viewpost?postid=67ee2069c2c98
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 4 weeks ago
> ALT+F "jew" - Phrase not found
An entire article about israeli military intelligence revealed, while simultaneously concealing by omission.
/v/Business viewpost?postid=67ee360e227c9
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 weeks ago
No word about deputizing Americans to strengthen the core of resistance to government overreach...instead it's always about perpetuating a conflict of reason (citizen vs non-citizen) among the many by poking both sides in return for a paycheck by few.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67ede2e1a1d93
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 4 weeks ago
Light brings states within (rays) apart from one another...uniting states together casts shadows over each other. A challenge can only happen within shadows.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=67ed5be94cee7
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 4 weeks ago
> Almost is not a portmanteau of all and most.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/almost
/v/Polls viewpost?postid=67ece047eb272
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 4 weeks ago
Only within ALL can there be a conflict between least vs MOST.
/v/Polls viewpost?postid=67ece047eb272
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 4 weeks ago
> keep reaching!
a) Wanting to keep tempts one to ignore needing to let go.
b) Reaching for suggested prevents perception from rising within perceivable
c) To exclaim a point (!) implies ones expressing life sentence trying to claim point of death.
Why are these the first thoughts in my mind when reading "keep reaching!"?
/v/Polls viewpost?postid=67ece047eb272
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 4 weeks ago
> you'll
How about for once...message over messenger?
> we
The worship of the word "We." When men accepted that worship, the structure of centuries collapsed about them, the structure whose every beam had come from the thought of some one man, each in his day down the ages, from the depth of some one spirit, such spirit as existed but for its own sake.
Those men who survived those eager to obey, eager to live for one another, since they had nothing else to vindicate them-those men could neither carry on, nor preserve what they had received. Thus did all thought, all science, all wisdom perish on earth. Thus did men - men with nothing to offer save their great number - lost the steel towers, the flying ships, the power wires, all the things they had not created and could never keep.
~Ayn Rand 'Anthem'(1938)
/v/Polls viewpost?postid=67ece047eb272