This spat is an embarrassment for both, both who support Israel. During a time when Israel hate has never been higher and any shifts in power have a 5% chance of not working out for Israel when usually that's 0%.
When even normies are waking up about Israel now is not a time to be encouraging shifts in power dynamics (from Israel's perspective).
Sometimes shit is complicated and not what it appears to be. But sometimes shit is simple and exactly what it appears to be. It's good to not have a bias toward considering either. Consider both.
I've considered both and it's option 1. Trump just has trouble working with other people and no positive relationship is permanent with him. What other positive political relationship has he had that didn't turn out this way? This is just Trump being Trump and Elon punching back with obvious shit. We didn't even need to hear from Elon to know Trump is in the Epstein files. We've seen the two associating. Of course he's in there.
No way. Trump likes H1B on his own. What happened was Elon sacrificed any public image he had for Trump and then Trump wanted nothing to do with him because of PR stink. But Elon's PR stink was only from his association with Trump.
Mindless TDS may be NPC programming but that doesn't preclude the reality that Trump is a piece of shit that uses people. You shouldn't need a case of full blown TDS to see that.
I wouldn't say no terminal use. But there is a ton of info online with accurate copy pasta for anything you want to do and AI.
There has never been a time to be less afraid of the terminal.
Use the terminal at least a little on day 1 just to get over any fear about it.
But yep, Linux is as simple as you want it to be. It's only hard if you want to do hard things. In fact it's easier than windows for hard things which is why developers use Linux. Window's difficulty curve starts off easy but if you want to do anything hard it gets really hard. You are going to need some certs. Linux actually has a lower slope learning curve and a starting base that's a tiny bit higher than Windows.
Forget Ubuntu. Go straight to Artix. There is this perception an arch based linux is harder but it's just not true. People with experience actually migrate to easier systems because it wastes less of their time.
Ubuntu keeps all of their software locked in the past. Well half of it. The problem is when you want to install something beyond the repository and you can't get Ubuntu's software to versions that are compatible, so you end up compiling an entire dependency tree only to find it keeps going deeper and deeper.
Or you can just use Artix (arch based) and everything is as new as now. Turns out most developers target for compatibility also with now instead of 10 years ago, so everything just works. Also the base repo for it is absolutely huge compared to Ubuntu and then the AUR on top of that has almost every software anyone has ever wanted to install on Linux. So you can always use a repo and always have the newest software.
See, easier. Experienced people use Arch because experienced people know what's easier and that holding packages in stable 10 years stale is bullshit. You are more likely to have something break having to work around that bullshit.
Then Artix is +1 better over Arch because its the same thing but no systemd.
For a very long time until recently I've used Artix for personal and Ubuntu for server. But I'm now done with Ubuntu for server. Just today I needing to install a npm package and g++ was complaining. On Ubuntu it's on version 9. On arch it's on version 15. You do the math. I can't even get a modern c++ compiler on Ubuntu that NPM assumes anyone should have access to. What would honestly break if Ubuntu let people compile modern c++?
I'm not some consooom newest software fiend but it's just ridiculous and it wastes time. I would buy the "older is more stable" myth and had when I was younger, but I also just have years of experience running 100% of my software within a month of any developer's edits and nothing breaks. It's shocking but it's true. Far less than Ubuntu. To the point that I'm investing significant time right now porting a lot of servers just because I know it will save time in the long run to never deal with version hell ever again.
If getting reasonably dated software to run on Ubuntu is hell for even an experienced person like myself to the point that I'm willing to put in a lot of work to avoid it, imagine how hard it will be for you?
Experienced people and beginners should be on the same distros because both are interested in things breaking less and avoiding time sucks. Experienced people move away from Ubuntu to Arch not because it's harder and they can but because it's easier.
If some makes something actually good they'll own it in a generation. Disney. Walt Disney being the anti-semite that he was should have ordered his company to be broken up on his death.
Candace Owens says Harvey Weinstein is innocent. I'm starting to buy it. Typical of the left to do nothing about real rape and exploitation in Holywood while if you look at the evidence for Harvey Weinstein it's just "ew you are a creep", "you made someone feel uncomfortable." Non-crimes. Reddit tier shit. When you look at who's doing it it's believable.
Will not do anything about real crime.
Will treat discomfort as a crime and make shit up and ruin lives over that.
If Weinstein was a real rapist they would be protecting him.
I think the other powers knew it. Hitler was a darling politician when he first started and he was definately talking about the jews. Jew hate is how he is demonized today. When WWII ended the western powers made extra haste to make Israel happen, something even Germany wanted.
On the matter of the 3rd paragraph down at least some of my thoughts are to contribute to the thread generally and my thoughts about the topic broadly. Anything up the tree is fair to comment on. Joe mentioned that what he did was a felony and shouldn't be. It sounds like we are all in agreement.
That's false. 9 year olds talk about anything they don't know but only a little about. Beyond sexuality, so speaking generally, it's the job of children that age to be maximally curious and try to get information from their peers. On sexuality this becomes extremely the case. When you were 9 did you talk about boobs with your friends?
Maybe Joe is wrong in his interpretation of that meaning they want to see it. But your claim about what 9 year olds don't talk about is absurd.
Did he actually harm someone with his warped assumptions of what childhood curiosity means? No. So it probably shouldn't be a felony. Felonies used to be for people who committed very serious and very certain harms, not things we've been PC conditioned to treat as unfathomable harms, because if anyone said otherwise they would be violating the PCism. This is how PC works. We can make up super crimes from minor ones. This is why PCism is dangerous because any minor crime can be turned into a super crime by labeling anyone who breaks the pattern of adherence or suggests balance.
After all only a witch would call for balance in how we determine who is a witch. If we want to find child rapists maybe we should only label child rapists.
I'd say most stupid people conform to the society they are in. So you get stupid people who are conservatives in conservative areas and stupid people who are leftists in leftist areas. Most of the people on this site are extremely stupid people.
Then why do you hang around so many antis that have been brainwashed by feminists? They are all traditionalists until a feminist tells them how their sexuality should work.
Here is a fun question. If that is legal in those states because the fed doesn't have authority over non-interstate commerce. But it is illegal in other states even if there is no interstate commerce. That would imply those states are acting under their authority since the ATF has none. How do states have authority to make federal law apply where it doesn't?
This happens often. Bills get modified, they get sent back and forth, and on one of the volleys it will just die.
Then after years of that happening not even passing the things they want to pass, they wait until there is a CR (continuing resolution) with a deadline to put all the dead legislation they've seen over the years, whether good or bad, and they actually pass it because a deadline prevents the volley.
Which is why you want to put the most based shit possible in these bills. It's not going to pass anyway. We might as well get them working up the muscle memory of voting yes, abolish the fed, or yes, make it illegal for a state to offer any kind of welfare to an illegal immigrant, or yes we should eliminate capital gains tax on individuals making less than $50k from realized gains (everyone but hedge funds).
Not thinking ahead. Now she's going to ask him why he doesn't just sit. This guy is going to become a pee sitter for the rest of his life. Major blunder.
I wonder if any of the whites in that photo weren't really resisting. That could have been a photo op. If you really didn't want to go to school with niggers you just don't show up.
You don't form a gathering, wait for cameras to show up, then the military, then march.
IDK, if it's on film it has at minimum a 40% chance of being fake.
Whether fake or not this is a lesson. Don't get on their film. If they are filming you it's because they're side is benefiting from it. The film will reach further than any impact you make on site. They can twist that film however they want. So if you are on their film you are their operative whether you are smart enough to realize it or not.
Fuck password stores too. Use some basic cryptography. One salt on disk, one salt generated from a master password via pbkdf2 (memorized), the site name. Hash it all together. Use the charset used by lastpass to encode. Now you have passwords of arbitrary length. No need to synchronize as long as you have that disk salt somewhere. Your computer can burn to the ground and you lose nothing.
I don't know why no one has published that software. You can code it in 5 minutes.
Better would be if no sites used passwords at all. Since we are in a situation where we need managers outside the browser anyway you could just use one to sign a phrase with asymmetric cryptography. Now you don't have to trust that sites manage passwords correctly. If you have to trust another party to do anything correctly that's bad security.
Thedancingsousa 0 points 1 week ago
Only missing part is it's the British that formalized and standardized the caste system.
/v/Whichever viewpost?postid=6842958e6df57
Thedancingsousa 2 points 1 week ago*
1 is more likely. 2 makes no sense.
This spat is an embarrassment for both, both who support Israel. During a time when Israel hate has never been higher and any shifts in power have a 5% chance of not working out for Israel when usually that's 0%.
When even normies are waking up about Israel now is not a time to be encouraging shifts in power dynamics (from Israel's perspective).
Sometimes shit is complicated and not what it appears to be. But sometimes shit is simple and exactly what it appears to be. It's good to not have a bias toward considering either. Consider both.
I've considered both and it's option 1. Trump just has trouble working with other people and no positive relationship is permanent with him. What other positive political relationship has he had that didn't turn out this way? This is just Trump being Trump and Elon punching back with obvious shit. We didn't even need to hear from Elon to know Trump is in the Epstein files. We've seen the two associating. Of course he's in there.
/v/news viewpost?postid=6842f65359504
Thedancingsousa 1 point 1 week ago
No way. Trump likes H1B on his own. What happened was Elon sacrificed any public image he had for Trump and then Trump wanted nothing to do with him because of PR stink. But Elon's PR stink was only from his association with Trump.
Mindless TDS may be NPC programming but that doesn't preclude the reality that Trump is a piece of shit that uses people. You shouldn't need a case of full blown TDS to see that.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6842115c5fdba
Thedancingsousa 0 points 1 week ago
I wouldn't say no terminal use. But there is a ton of info online with accurate copy pasta for anything you want to do and AI.
There has never been a time to be less afraid of the terminal.
Use the terminal at least a little on day 1 just to get over any fear about it.
But yep, Linux is as simple as you want it to be. It's only hard if you want to do hard things. In fact it's easier than windows for hard things which is why developers use Linux. Window's difficulty curve starts off easy but if you want to do anything hard it gets really hard. You are going to need some certs. Linux actually has a lower slope learning curve and a starting base that's a tiny bit higher than Windows.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=68408819b68ce
Thedancingsousa 0 points 1 week ago
Wanting him to have a good first experience is not gatekeeping.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=68408819b68ce
Thedancingsousa 2 points 1 week ago*
Forget Ubuntu. Go straight to Artix. There is this perception an arch based linux is harder but it's just not true. People with experience actually migrate to easier systems because it wastes less of their time.
Ubuntu keeps all of their software locked in the past. Well half of it. The problem is when you want to install something beyond the repository and you can't get Ubuntu's software to versions that are compatible, so you end up compiling an entire dependency tree only to find it keeps going deeper and deeper.
Or you can just use Artix (arch based) and everything is as new as now. Turns out most developers target for compatibility also with now instead of 10 years ago, so everything just works. Also the base repo for it is absolutely huge compared to Ubuntu and then the AUR on top of that has almost every software anyone has ever wanted to install on Linux. So you can always use a repo and always have the newest software.
See, easier. Experienced people use Arch because experienced people know what's easier and that holding packages in stable 10 years stale is bullshit. You are more likely to have something break having to work around that bullshit.
Then Artix is +1 better over Arch because its the same thing but no systemd.
For a very long time until recently I've used Artix for personal and Ubuntu for server. But I'm now done with Ubuntu for server. Just today I needing to install a npm package and g++ was complaining. On Ubuntu it's on version 9. On arch it's on version 15. You do the math. I can't even get a modern c++ compiler on Ubuntu that NPM assumes anyone should have access to. What would honestly break if Ubuntu let people compile modern c++?
I'm not some consooom newest software fiend but it's just ridiculous and it wastes time. I would buy the "older is more stable" myth and had when I was younger, but I also just have years of experience running 100% of my software within a month of any developer's edits and nothing breaks. It's shocking but it's true. Far less than Ubuntu. To the point that I'm investing significant time right now porting a lot of servers just because I know it will save time in the long run to never deal with version hell ever again.
If getting reasonably dated software to run on Ubuntu is hell for even an experienced person like myself to the point that I'm willing to put in a lot of work to avoid it, imagine how hard it will be for you?
Experienced people and beginners should be on the same distros because both are interested in things breaking less and avoiding time sucks. Experienced people move away from Ubuntu to Arch not because it's harder and they can but because it's easier.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=68408819b68ce
Thedancingsousa 3 points 1 week ago
Human mice hybrids are wrong and the scientists who did this should be shot in the face.
/v/science viewpost?postid=683fbcb18ef0d
Thedancingsousa 1 point 1 week ago
If some makes something actually good they'll own it in a generation. Disney. Walt Disney being the anti-semite that he was should have ordered his company to be broken up on his death.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=683f955a45025
Thedancingsousa 1 point 1 week ago
Candace Owens says Harvey Weinstein is innocent. I'm starting to buy it. Typical of the left to do nothing about real rape and exploitation in Holywood while if you look at the evidence for Harvey Weinstein it's just "ew you are a creep", "you made someone feel uncomfortable." Non-crimes. Reddit tier shit. When you look at who's doing it it's believable.
Will not do anything about real crime.
Will treat discomfort as a crime and make shit up and ruin lives over that.
If Weinstein was a real rapist they would be protecting him.
/v/Memes viewpost?postid=683d967d1f889
Thedancingsousa 1 point 1 week ago
If the US just got rid of copyright no one would have produced it. This is one of the costs of copyright.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=683d12ce0f958
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
I think the other powers knew it. Hitler was a darling politician when he first started and he was definately talking about the jews. Jew hate is how he is demonized today. When WWII ended the western powers made extra haste to make Israel happen, something even Germany wanted.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6839e5d07e4c8
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
Swedish things like sonder, the contemplation of everyone's life being as real as your own. Not niggers.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6839e5d07e4c8
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago
On the matter of the 3rd paragraph down at least some of my thoughts are to contribute to the thread generally and my thoughts about the topic broadly. Anything up the tree is fair to comment on. Joe mentioned that what he did was a felony and shouldn't be. It sounds like we are all in agreement.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68399ca7b1c19
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago*
That's false. 9 year olds talk about anything they don't know but only a little about. Beyond sexuality, so speaking generally, it's the job of children that age to be maximally curious and try to get information from their peers. On sexuality this becomes extremely the case. When you were 9 did you talk about boobs with your friends?
Maybe Joe is wrong in his interpretation of that meaning they want to see it. But your claim about what 9 year olds don't talk about is absurd.
Did he actually harm someone with his warped assumptions of what childhood curiosity means? No. So it probably shouldn't be a felony. Felonies used to be for people who committed very serious and very certain harms, not things we've been PC conditioned to treat as unfathomable harms, because if anyone said otherwise they would be violating the PCism. This is how PC works. We can make up super crimes from minor ones. This is why PCism is dangerous because any minor crime can be turned into a super crime by labeling anyone who breaks the pattern of adherence or suggests balance.
After all only a witch would call for balance in how we determine who is a witch. If we want to find child rapists maybe we should only label child rapists.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68399ca7b1c19
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
I'd say most stupid people conform to the society they are in. So you get stupid people who are conservatives in conservative areas and stupid people who are leftists in leftist areas. Most of the people on this site are extremely stupid people.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=683902dc209b7
Thedancingsousa 3 points 2 weeks ago
And he can be a nigger if he does nigger things, like abide niggers.
Oh wait, not even niggers do that. That's why they move to Sweden.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6839e5d07e4c8
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
Then why do you hang around so many antis that have been brainwashed by feminists? They are all traditionalists until a feminist tells them how their sexuality should work.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=683902dc209b7
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
Really scary thing is that would end up being appealed after a trial and conviction and right to an appeal is practically a lottery anyway.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6838ad9927c40
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
Here is a fun question. If that is legal in those states because the fed doesn't have authority over non-interstate commerce. But it is illegal in other states even if there is no interstate commerce. That would imply those states are acting under their authority since the ATF has none. How do states have authority to make federal law apply where it doesn't?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6838ad9927c40
Thedancingsousa -1 points 2 weeks ago*
This happens often. Bills get modified, they get sent back and forth, and on one of the volleys it will just die.
Then after years of that happening not even passing the things they want to pass, they wait until there is a CR (continuing resolution) with a deadline to put all the dead legislation they've seen over the years, whether good or bad, and they actually pass it because a deadline prevents the volley.
Which is why you want to put the most based shit possible in these bills. It's not going to pass anyway. We might as well get them working up the muscle memory of voting yes, abolish the fed, or yes, make it illegal for a state to offer any kind of welfare to an illegal immigrant, or yes we should eliminate capital gains tax on individuals making less than $50k from realized gains (everyone but hedge funds).
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6838ad9927c40
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago
Not thinking ahead. Now she's going to ask him why he doesn't just sit. This guy is going to become a pee sitter for the rest of his life. Major blunder.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=6837e12b25d8f
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago
Wait, some ZOG might die?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6837d14c1558f
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago
I'm remote viewing it now. Yeah man, you were pretty young.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68375046a730e
Thedancingsousa 3 points 2 weeks ago*
I wonder if any of the whites in that photo weren't really resisting. That could have been a photo op. If you really didn't want to go to school with niggers you just don't show up.
You don't form a gathering, wait for cameras to show up, then the military, then march.
IDK, if it's on film it has at minimum a 40% chance of being fake.
Whether fake or not this is a lesson. Don't get on their film. If they are filming you it's because they're side is benefiting from it. The film will reach further than any impact you make on site. They can twist that film however they want. So if you are on their film you are their operative whether you are smart enough to realize it or not.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68375046a730e
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago*
SiNgLe SiGnIn.
Fuck password stores too. Use some basic cryptography. One salt on disk, one salt generated from a master password via pbkdf2 (memorized), the site name. Hash it all together. Use the charset used by lastpass to encode. Now you have passwords of arbitrary length. No need to synchronize as long as you have that disk salt somewhere. Your computer can burn to the ground and you lose nothing.
I don't know why no one has published that software. You can code it in 5 minutes.
Better would be if no sites used passwords at all. Since we are in a situation where we need managers outside the browser anyway you could just use one to sign a phrase with asymmetric cryptography. Now you don't have to trust that sites manage passwords correctly. If you have to trust another party to do anything correctly that's bad security.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=6837708501207