I'm denying what is observed? That would be the mainstream scientists, not me. I see that a muon breaks down into smaller parts and I accept that observation and accept that it isn't a fundamental particle. Mainstream science ignores the observations. Or is it perfectly logical for a fundamental particle to break down into smaller objects while not being composed of anything smaller? If you take anything and break it apart the components you get comprised the original object. You never get something that didn't comprised it and you certainly wouldn't get something else at all if the original object was made of nothing else.
Yep, love pilot wave, also check out Jeff Yee's energy wave theory, he tried to build his model on experimental observations and logic, some of the stuff is amazing
Thats fine but the models would have to have uncertainty because they aren't that well constructed, otherwise you would actually be saying logically contradictory things happen (which people actually believe that cats can be alive and dead because of this)
I don't really believe duality of light, it seems like it can be explained as simply just a wave. I have a lot of questions about the double slit experiment it's difficult to find answers to. Like they claim to be firing a single "photon" at once, but are they actually? What does that mean? If you fire it first through a beam splitter does that single "photon" just randomly come out one side or does it magically split in 2. If it spits in 2 I either think it wasn't 1 photon or that a photon isn't (ever) a particle
People always make this argument that you need relativity for GPS but to me that seem, as you said, ignorant. If einstein didn't exist and someone made a GPS system and noticed the clocks desynced they would instantly know how to correct it because they can look at them and tell how much they desynced. I talked about dark matter being required to correct einsteins idea of gravity, I didn't mention any time variants. Also, physical objects are effected by gravity, clocks are physical objects. How do you differentiate between a clock slowing down from time itself slowing down. Hell if I know. But at LEAST aspects of relativity are wrong as it requires the dark matter invention. I'm interested in experimental observations because that is actual science. If clocks slow down in an accelerated field or whatever, ok, you have to figure out why, you think time itself is slowing down rather than a clock simply slowing down, I don't know.
I said I could be wrong and to do your own research. I made this as a discussion. You didn't make an argument so I can't respond to anything you wrote.
Did you even read it? Relativity is wrong, it requires dark matter. Dark matter was invented as a patch to correct relativity, has nothing to do with einstien being a kike. Though einsteins fame has to do with being a kike, his theory is untouchable because kikes control everything. It's been proven to be incorrect by needing dark matter
Ears below the eyes? What does that mean. If your ears were above your eyes they would be on your temples. Also the tops of his ears are above his eyes, the bottoms of his ears are below his eyes. I can't figure out what the hell you are getting at.
GottaGasEmAll 7 points 3.9 years ago
I don't know but any city that is more than 1% black is way too much
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=60ce8d78e332f
GottaGasEmAll 2 points 3.9 years ago
Damn they missed that filthy corrupt kike
/v/news viewpost?postid=60ceac07d921c
GottaGasEmAll 5 points 3.9 years ago
They have had a hundred god damn years of trying their damnedest to fuck us over. We could crush them in a week.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60ce38a62d5c4
GottaGasEmAll 3 points 3.9 years ago
Though it isn't just "skin color". If someone says this I immediately ask them if they have seen the societies blacks build
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60ce38a62d5c4
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
I'm denying what is observed? That would be the mainstream scientists, not me. I see that a muon breaks down into smaller parts and I accept that observation and accept that it isn't a fundamental particle. Mainstream science ignores the observations. Or is it perfectly logical for a fundamental particle to break down into smaller objects while not being composed of anything smaller? If you take anything and break it apart the components you get comprised the original object. You never get something that didn't comprised it and you certainly wouldn't get something else at all if the original object was made of nothing else.
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
Why do all these companies let kikes make their commercials? Or are all the companies already owned by kikes
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=60cc29ba0080d
GottaGasEmAll 4 points 3.9 years ago
It's grotesquely ugly. The person not the shoe
/v/WTF viewpost?postid=60cc45ceaaf85
GottaGasEmAll 1 point 3.9 years ago
joe also said that he "can't wait" for White genocide (Whites becoming the minority)
/v/TellVoat viewpost?postid=60ccc1683ecfe
GottaGasEmAll 1 point 3.9 years ago
joe also said that he "can't wait" for White genocide (Whites becoming minorities)
/v/LyingNewsMedia viewpost?postid=60cc926956cc5
GottaGasEmAll 2 points 3.9 years ago
Wow he actually named soros?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60cc4ccba4aaf
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
Yep, love pilot wave, also check out Jeff Yee's energy wave theory, he tried to build his model on experimental observations and logic, some of the stuff is amazing
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
Thats fine but the models would have to have uncertainty because they aren't that well constructed, otherwise you would actually be saying logically contradictory things happen (which people actually believe that cats can be alive and dead because of this)
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
Honestly I think string theory is an even bigger, I don't know, lie? 11 dimensions that nobody can find? There are 3 dimensions.
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
I don't really believe duality of light, it seems like it can be explained as simply just a wave. I have a lot of questions about the double slit experiment it's difficult to find answers to. Like they claim to be firing a single "photon" at once, but are they actually? What does that mean? If you fire it first through a beam splitter does that single "photon" just randomly come out one side or does it magically split in 2. If it spits in 2 I either think it wasn't 1 photon or that a photon isn't (ever) a particle
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
People always make this argument that you need relativity for GPS but to me that seem, as you said, ignorant. If einstein didn't exist and someone made a GPS system and noticed the clocks desynced they would instantly know how to correct it because they can look at them and tell how much they desynced. I talked about dark matter being required to correct einsteins idea of gravity, I didn't mention any time variants. Also, physical objects are effected by gravity, clocks are physical objects. How do you differentiate between a clock slowing down from time itself slowing down. Hell if I know. But at LEAST aspects of relativity are wrong as it requires the dark matter invention. I'm interested in experimental observations because that is actual science. If clocks slow down in an accelerated field or whatever, ok, you have to figure out why, you think time itself is slowing down rather than a clock simply slowing down, I don't know.
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 1 point 3.9 years ago
I said I could be wrong and to do your own research. I made this as a discussion. You didn't make an argument so I can't respond to anything you wrote.
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
Did you even read it? Relativity is wrong, it requires dark matter. Dark matter was invented as a patch to correct relativity, has nothing to do with einstien being a kike. Though einsteins fame has to do with being a kike, his theory is untouchable because kikes control everything. It's been proven to be incorrect by needing dark matter
/v/science viewpost?postid=60c9631ecc446
GottaGasEmAll 1 point 3.9 years ago
How about worry about the kikes and stop bagging on someone at least attempting something good
/v/GoFraudMe viewpost?postid=60c8fcaa0fba1
GottaGasEmAll 3 points 3.9 years ago
Jesus I thought my brothers dog was big
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60c56b659ad24
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
Ears below the eyes? What does that mean. If your ears were above your eyes they would be on your temples. Also the tops of his ears are above his eyes, the bottoms of his ears are below his eyes. I can't figure out what the hell you are getting at.
/v/news viewpost?postid=60c36e5b7f958
GottaGasEmAll 8 points 3.9 years ago
Can anyone ever fight back in any way or is it always glowies?
/v/videos viewpost?postid=60c4d5599b15e
GottaGasEmAll 1 point 3.9 years ago
She went 100%. Chicks got ovaries.
/v/Elegant_as_Fuck viewpost?postid=60c4f7bfe124a
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
I look beyond the seat. But if I put it on the front it would be a lot smaller. Personal preference really.
/v/gaming viewpost?postid=60c2c723ca64f
GottaGasEmAll 0 points 3.9 years ago
Half the world is already frozen in ice for half the year how much colder do they want it..
/v/science viewpost?postid=606abd22e3aa5
GottaGasEmAll 1 point 3.9 years ago
So calculate it then.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60c05ed1897ae