I've watched the rant you're not linking and understand what Nick's getting at.
When an adult jew bangs a 16 year old, it's against the law. When an adult jew bangs a 3 year old, it's against the law. Calling them both pedophiles takes away from the severity of the 2nd crime.
Swap out an adult jew for an 18 year old. An 18 year old can get in trouble for banging a 16 year old, but is he a pedophile? He is if she's 3.
This is similar to the left calling every dopey boomer trump voter a nazi.
And keep in mind, most of the first world has 16 as the age of consent, only the jewnited states seems to be fully jewed and different.
16 is the legal age of leaving school, joining the army and getting married (no parents needed either). So 16 is an adult. Some jew in the jewnited states saying anything different can fuck off.
Oddly, what they call children in the jewnited states, they let drive 3 ton death machines without supervision. Hilarious.
[ - ] BMN003 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 13:39:04 ago (+1/-0)
You need to get your facts about US laws from somewhere besides Hollyweird. Only 11 states have an age of consent of 18, and 6 of those have close age exceptions ranging from 2-4 years difference (e.g. 13 and 17, or 17 and 21 is not statutory rape in Tennessee, though obviously regular sexual assault charges can be leveled at any age if there was coercion involved.) Even in the Clown State of California, two 17 year olds have only committed a minor crime if they engage in sexual activity, not statutory rape. They just have the retarded arrangement that it becomes a class B felony at the stroke of midnight on the older one's birthday.
Anyway, in the remaining 39 states, the real age of consent is typically the federal one: 16. Texas is the only state I know of with a "hard" 17, but even then a judge is allowed the discretion to reduce or even dismiss a statutory rape charge if the "offender" is under 19.
So yeah. California is fucked up and the fucked-up writers who write for Talmudvision write what they know.
The age of consent is 16 in the majority of US states. https://www.ageofconsent.net/states Breakdown: 32 states are 16, 8 states are 17, 10 states have 18.
This is why Nick the Spic fed has never had a girlfriend. He likes em too young. If he’s comfortable talking about hebephilia, you can safely conclude that he actually prefers them even younger. He’s is probably attracted to prepubescent girls no older than 12.
Well, that's a lot more literal than I meant it. What I was pointing out was that it's not a good thing either way. So, no, I don't actually think a consenting 14 year old is as bad as a consenting 7 year old. Throw in rape, and yes, that's much worse.
Oh, then it must be true. Let's disregard everything that epstein had said and done in all the other files, and let's ignore what Fuentes was actually saying, too.
Epstein suggested Woody Allen was a pedophile and maybe likened himself to Woody, so that means he's a pedo, too.
Like the file from a "victim" who was 16 at the time that said she had lied about her age because Epstein was insistent that all the girls be at least 18, and that she was never asked to do anything the she didn't want to do. That she had brought many of her friends to his parties to get paid for messages who all liked Epstein, and who Epstein believed were all 18 or older.
Fuentes was saying what you suggested in the title, that Epstein was at worst a hebephile, not a pedophile. That Epstein was into sex with young, but sexually mature, girls.
"Too many pedophiles?" is what you're using to suggest that he called himself a pedo, right? He mentioned Ehud, which I assumed was Ehud Barrak, and he mentioned Woody, which I assumed was Woody Allen, a known child groomer and hebephile.
Epstein was insistent that all the girls be at least 18
If that were true this thread would not exist. We would not be talking about Epstein.
Fuentes was saying what you suggested in the title, that Epstein was at worst a hebephile, not a pedophile. That Epstein was into sex with young, but sexually mature, girls.
Yes, That is the story we're all being spoon-fed to believe.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 08:05:23 ago (+1/-0)
11 hours earlier but as part of this dinner, right?
The file exists. The victim said that she lied about her age and had to pass on numerous opportunities to have Epstein help advance her modeling career because she was afraid he would find out that she was under 18. She also said that when she would invite her friends to these parties, she told her friends that they had to be 18 and up and to lie if they were under 18.
That's in the files.
No one is suggesting that he didn't have sex with girls under 18, but by the actual terms, Epstein was not a pedophile, he was a hebephile, like Fuentes had suggested. And not only was it suggested, but also condemned by Fuentes. No one thinks it's okay what Epstein did, but let's be clear about what he was actually doing versus the salacious bullshit being pumped out by click baiters and nog bishes.
So he's just hanging out with pedos and refers to them as pedos, but he himself is not a pedo but a HEBEPHILE ? Lol ok. I think you need to get your head out of Bitch Fuentes's ass.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 08:42:33 ago (+2/-1)
There was been zero actual allegations that Epstein sought relations with girls under 14. He was accused and convicted of attempting to have sex with and traffick girls 14-17. The two people mentioned in the file you linked to were known to have relationships with post-pubescent girls.
If you have evidence of Epstein having sex with pre-pubescent girls, please post it. Let's take a look. But a tounge in cheek allusion to Epstein labeling himself a pedo isn't evidence of anything.
You're doing what @PostWallHelena does, and it's why we lose.
THE TRUTH! BUT MUH TRUTH! IT'S TERRIBLY IMPORTANT THAT WE CATEGORIZE JEFFREY EPSTEIN CORRECTLY. IT'S HEBE...NOT PEDO! Acccckshuallly, he was only stated as trafficking in girls aged 14-17. . .
The point being, you're running an explicit defense for a guy who is ringleading a human trafficking cartel (is unabashedly Jewish-supremacist and is working to harangue your nation's politicians) by trying to weaken the severity of what he himself personally did to underage girls. By the way, you don't really know what Jeffrey Epstein did. We're using scattered evidence to paint a likely picture. That's it. It's underspecified. So what do you do in situations like that when it is unequivocally true that the person in question is your enemy? You do what works.
Let's even say that, according to some (non-existent) objective fact of the mattter, you're right: it's more correct to say JE is a hebephile rather than a pedophile.
WHO FUCKING CARES, YOU STUPID FUCK
You're sitting here whacking your little cock to I NEVER TELL A LIE while we're trying to fucking win.
Would Jeffrey Epstein have insisted on this distinction if he was coming after you? Would any Jew? Would any Leftist? No. They'd think: he's diddling teeny boppers, we're gonna call him whatever it's most effective to call him, whatever is going to have the most success. If we're honest, all of those people would call you a pedophile without any evidence, on just the remote chance it would work.
Jeffrey Epstein is a pedophile. You're not lying. You're giving the benefit of the doubt to yourself, to your people. You're exploiting the underdetermination of the facts. Get it? Do you understand yet? Smarten the fuck up.
Why are we losing? Because we're stupid as fuck. No street smarts. No uncompromising in-group bias. Jews don't need to say to each other what I just told you above. They just do it without instruction. They do what works for their people. Until we do that, we're gonna keep losing.
It is important because pedophiles deserve the wood chipper. Nick's entire point in the unlinked rant is calling everyone a pedophile takes away from the seriousness of crimes against children. Same principle as the left calling everyone a racist dilutes it's meaning.
An 18 year old can get charged with sex crimes for banging a 16 year old. Same thing if he bangs a 3 year old. You're saying they're both pedophiles? Same difference, right?
A guy can be charged as a sex offender which requires registering for the rest of his life for peeing alone in a dark alleyway behind a bar. He's a sex offender, same as the guy fucking a 3 year old. Same difference, right?
Before you get all gay on me, epstein was likely banging or eating little kids and deserved the wood chipper either way. All jews deserve it.
That's what's at stake right now? A moment like this, with a drop like this? What's at stake is the significance of the term pedophilia and the fact that Jeffrey Epstein being a hebephile, rather than a pedophile, might undermine the use of the term pedophile for us?
This isn't serious. This is braindead.
"Think of the ACTUAL victims of pedophilia you're obscuring!"
This hurts Nick's case. It doesn't help it.
You guys just have no strategic sense at all. I thought Nick would.
If you call Epstein a pedophile (and let's even say that the correct term is hebephile), what happens when your opponent tries to correct you? Where does that leave them? Defending how Epstein 'only' trafficked/fucked young teens. This is advantageous for you. You want your enemy in that position.
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 12:19:14 ago (+1/-0)
From dictionary.com:
What does pedo- mean? Pedo- is a combining form used like a prefix that has two distinct senses.The first of these senses is “child,” and this form of pedo- is occasionally used in a variety of scientific and technical terms. The form pedo- in this sense comes from Greek paîs, meaning “child.”The second of these senses is “soil,” and this form of pedo- is used very rarely in some scientific terms. The form pedo- in this sense comes from Greek pédon, meaning “ground” or “earth.”What are variants of pedo- with the sense “child”?When combined with words or word elements that begin with a vowel, pedo- becomes ped-, as in pedagogue, from Greek paidagōgós. Want to know more? Read our Words That Use article on ped-.In British English, pedo- in this sense is chiefly spelled paedo-, as in paedology. Another variant spelling of pedo- is paido-, as in paidophobia.What are variants of pedo- with the sense “soil”?When combined with words or word elements that begin with a vowel, pedo- becomes ped-, as in pedon. Want to know more? Read our Words That Use article on ped-.Not every word that begins with the exact letters pedo-, such as pedograph or pedometer, is necessarily using the combining form pedo- to denote “child” or "soil.” In these cases, pedo- is used as a variant of pedi-, meaning "foot," in words from French. Learn more at our entries for the words pedograph and pedometer.
What Epstein was is only part of the story. Let's just say sure, he's a "hebephile", fine... what about all of the "clients" that he supplied girls for? Were they all hebephiles, too?
Are hebephiles morally superior to pedophiles? This is a ridiculous conversation. It's obfuscating the awful shit these people do by trying to play stupid semantic games: THE MAN WAS A CHILD SEX TRAFFICKER. Some of those CHILDREN were close to 18, but just imagine how many were not.
Anybody who can't see that this is a form of protection racket is an absolute moron. Legitimately, if Nick is splitting hairs about this, he has lost a ton of credibility with me. The right answer is that this topic isn't on the table for anybody serious.
No. Being honest about the facts is the only way. Lying and making shit up to make people look bad is bullshit.
Look at Owens running around saying Epstein gave money to Baal and was part of a baby eating cabal. That stupid shit will backfire on her and anyone advocating for her.
Epstein was a criminal and is now dead. No one is saying that what he did wasn't bad, wrong, immoral, criminal and part of an international conspiracy to blackmail rich and powerful people.
And, the point that Fuentes was making was exactly that this bullshit being put out all over the internet is what is obfuscating what matters most. And, what matters most is NOT that Epstein was a pedophile. What matters most is that he was part of an Israeli led effort to blackmail rich and powerful people for the benefit of Israel. What matters is that Epstein was loyal to Israel and using his fellow jews to place himself in positions where he could get extortion material to control US policy for his fellow jews. What matters is that Epstein was a jew and he and his jew friends hated the goy. That matters far more than labeling him, a dead guy, as a pedophile instead of a hebefile, ya fuckin' idiot.
You hear a bump in the night. You walk downstairs to find that a man holding a gun is crawling through the window.
What's your evidence?
It could support: this is a criminal who intends to shoot me and my family
It could also support: this is an undercover cop who is in hot pursuit of a maniac that's hiding in the pantry of my home right now; he is here to protect us
What do you do?
You shoot the fucker.
Why? Because given what your enemies do to you (if that's what he is), you don't have the resources to investigate. You have a duty to your family. You shoot.
It's the same here. You give yourself the benefit of the doubt. Jeffrey Epstein had a fucking weird island temple where they did sexual rituals with teens and also trafficked them around the world.
YOU FUCKING SHOOT. You saying that we should only go after his Jewish-supremacy is like saying you should only put one bullet in the guy crawling through your window. NO. EMPTY THE CLIP.
War is a game. You get opportunities. When your enemy is weak, you strike. This is probably the strongest reason I have for finding Fuentes pretty suspect at this exact time. Why? Because he is smart enough to know that now is not the time you start splitting hairs over the precise kind of sexual deviancy you attribute to your FUCKING ENEMY. That is nothing but giving away the moment and the opportunity so we can masturbate about labels.
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 6 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 10:36:51 ago (+8/-2)
When an adult jew bangs a 16 year old, it's against the law. When an adult jew bangs a 3 year old, it's against the law. Calling them both pedophiles takes away from the severity of the 2nd crime.
Swap out an adult jew for an 18 year old. An 18 year old can get in trouble for banging a 16 year old, but is he a pedophile? He is if she's 3.
This is similar to the left calling every dopey boomer trump voter a nazi.
[ + ] DivineLight2
[ - ] DivineLight2 3 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 11:27:18 ago (+3/-0)
16 is the legal age of leaving school, joining the army and getting married (no parents needed either). So 16 is an adult. Some jew in the jewnited states saying anything different can fuck off.
Oddly, what they call children in the jewnited states, they let drive 3 ton death machines without supervision. Hilarious.
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 3 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 11:46:34 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] BMN003
[ - ] BMN003 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 13:39:04 ago (+1/-0)
Anyway, in the remaining 39 states, the real age of consent is typically the federal one: 16. Texas is the only state I know of with a "hard" 17, but even then a judge is allowed the discretion to reduce or even dismiss a statutory rape charge if the "offender" is under 19.
So yeah. California is fucked up and the fucked-up writers who write for Talmudvision write what they know.
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull 0 points 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 17:06:50 ago (+0/-0)
Breakdown: 32 states are 16, 8 states are 17, 10 states have 18.
[ + ] goatfugee12
[ - ] goatfugee12 2 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 11:29:29 ago (+2/-0)
Seinfield dated a 17 year old then married her in new york when he was like 40.
but it true the low IQ's here on voat need to differentiate between fucking an underage girl vs raping a toddler.
It's not the same charge, even the law typically distinguishes between carnal knowledge vs carnal knowledge victim under 12.
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 11:48:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GrayDragon
[ - ] GrayDragon -1 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 10:53:09 ago (+3/-4)
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 3 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 11:07:31 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] HelenHighwater
[ - ] HelenHighwater 1 point 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 19:23:40 ago (+1/-0)
Never once liked that motherfucker.
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra 1 point 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 15:49:09 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 12:45:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 13:54:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] oyveyo
[ - ] oyveyo 0 points 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 15:21:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 08:42:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 11:14:32 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 0 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 07:36:54 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] goatfugee12
[ - ] goatfugee12 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 11:17:38 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 0 points 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 22:08:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 dayFeb 5, 2026 10:24:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 07:28:09 ago (+2/-2)
Epstein suggested Woody Allen was a pedophile and maybe likened himself to Woody, so that means he's a pedo, too.
[ + ] Niggly_Puff
[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] 2 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 07:31:15 ago (+2/-0)
What must be true? These are files on the DOJ's website.
Like what?
What was he actually saying?
What?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 07:39:35 ago (+0/-0)
Fuentes was saying what you suggested in the title, that Epstein was at worst a hebephile, not a pedophile. That Epstein was into sex with young, but sexually mature, girls.
"Too many pedophiles?" is what you're using to suggest that he called himself a pedo, right? He mentioned Ehud, which I assumed was Ehud Barrak, and he mentioned Woody, which I assumed was Woody Allen, a known child groomer and hebephile.
[ + ] Niggly_Puff
[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 07:55:56 ago (+1/-0)
If that were true this thread would not exist. We would not be talking about Epstein.
Yes, That is the story we're all being spoon-fed to believe.
11 hours earlier
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 08:05:23 ago (+1/-0)
The file exists. The victim said that she lied about her age and had to pass on numerous opportunities to have Epstein help advance her modeling career because she was afraid he would find out that she was under 18. She also said that when she would invite her friends to these parties, she told her friends that they had to be 18 and up and to lie if they were under 18.
That's in the files.
No one is suggesting that he didn't have sex with girls under 18, but by the actual terms, Epstein was not a pedophile, he was a hebephile, like Fuentes had suggested. And not only was it suggested, but also condemned by Fuentes. No one thinks it's okay what Epstein did, but let's be clear about what he was actually doing versus the salacious bullshit being pumped out by click baiters and nog bishes.
[ + ] Niggly_Puff
[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] 2 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 08:18:08 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 08:42:33 ago (+2/-1)
If you have evidence of Epstein having sex with pre-pubescent girls, please post it. Let's take a look. But a tounge in cheek allusion to Epstein labeling himself a pedo isn't evidence of anything.
So, post away, let's see what you've got.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 3 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 09:38:40 ago (+3/-0)
Mental illness.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 2 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 10:07:19 ago (+3/-1)*
THE TRUTH! BUT MUH TRUTH! IT'S TERRIBLY IMPORTANT THAT WE CATEGORIZE JEFFREY EPSTEIN CORRECTLY. IT'S HEBE...NOT PEDO! Acccckshuallly, he was only stated as trafficking in girls aged 14-17. . .
The point being, you're running an explicit defense for a guy who is ringleading a human trafficking cartel (is unabashedly Jewish-supremacist and is working to harangue your nation's politicians) by trying to weaken the severity of what he himself personally did to underage girls. By the way, you don't really know what Jeffrey Epstein did. We're using scattered evidence to paint a likely picture. That's it. It's underspecified. So what do you do in situations like that when it is unequivocally true that the person in question is your enemy? You do what works.
Let's even say that, according to some (non-existent) objective fact of the mattter, you're right: it's more correct to say JE is a hebephile rather than a pedophile.
WHO FUCKING CARES, YOU STUPID FUCK
You're sitting here whacking your little cock to I NEVER TELL A LIE while we're trying to fucking win.
Would Jeffrey Epstein have insisted on this distinction if he was coming after you? Would any Jew? Would any Leftist? No. They'd think: he's diddling teeny boppers, we're gonna call him whatever it's most effective to call him, whatever is going to have the most success. If we're honest, all of those people would call you a pedophile without any evidence, on just the remote chance it would work.
Jeffrey Epstein is a pedophile. You're not lying. You're giving the benefit of the doubt to yourself, to your people. You're exploiting the underdetermination of the facts. Get it? Do you understand yet? Smarten the fuck up.
Why are we losing? Because we're stupid as fuck. No street smarts. No uncompromising in-group bias. Jews don't need to say to each other what I just told you above. They just do it without instruction. They do what works for their people. Until we do that, we're gonna keep losing.
[ + ] ruck_feddit
[ - ] ruck_feddit 2 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 10:48:06 ago (+2/-0)
An 18 year old can get charged with sex crimes for banging a 16 year old. Same thing if he bangs a 3 year old. You're saying they're both pedophiles? Same difference, right?
A guy can be charged as a sex offender which requires registering for the rest of his life for peeing alone in a dark alleyway behind a bar. He's a sex offender, same as the guy fucking a 3 year old. Same difference, right?
Before you get all gay on me, epstein was likely banging or eating little kids and deserved the wood chipper either way. All jews deserve it.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO -1 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 10:53:21 ago (+0/-1)*
This isn't serious. This is braindead.
"Think of the ACTUAL victims of pedophilia you're obscuring!"
This hurts Nick's case. It doesn't help it.
You guys just have no strategic sense at all. I thought Nick would.
If you call Epstein a pedophile (and let's even say that the correct term is hebephile), what happens when your opponent tries to correct you? Where does that leave them? Defending how Epstein 'only' trafficked/fucked young teens. This is advantageous for you. You want your enemy in that position.
[ + ] Sanguinius
[ - ] Sanguinius 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 12:05:46 ago (+2/-1)
A "pedophile" would be someone who is into feet.
Americans have butchered the language alongside the culture.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 12:19:14 ago (+1/-0)
What does pedo- mean? Pedo- is a combining form used like a prefix that has two distinct senses.The first of these senses is “child,” and this form of pedo- is occasionally used in a variety of scientific and technical terms. The form pedo- in this sense comes from Greek paîs, meaning “child.”The second of these senses is “soil,” and this form of pedo- is used very rarely in some scientific terms. The form pedo- in this sense comes from Greek pédon, meaning “ground” or “earth.”What are variants of pedo- with the sense “child”?When combined with words or word elements that begin with a vowel, pedo- becomes ped-, as in pedagogue, from Greek paidagōgós. Want to know more? Read our Words That Use article on ped-.In British English, pedo- in this sense is chiefly spelled paedo-, as in paedology. Another variant spelling of pedo- is paido-, as in paidophobia.What are variants of pedo- with the sense “soil”?When combined with words or word elements that begin with a vowel, pedo- becomes ped-, as in pedon. Want to know more? Read our Words That Use article on ped-.Not every word that begins with the exact letters pedo-, such as pedograph or pedometer, is necessarily using the combining form pedo- to denote “child” or "soil.” In these cases, pedo- is used as a variant of pedi-, meaning "foot," in words from French. Learn more at our entries for the words pedograph and pedometer.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 1 dayFeb 5, 2026 13:52:08 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 1 point 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 15:48:02 ago (+1/-0)
Are hebephiles morally superior to pedophiles? This is a ridiculous conversation. It's obfuscating the awful shit these people do by trying to play stupid semantic games: THE MAN WAS A CHILD SEX TRAFFICKER. Some of those CHILDREN were close to 18, but just imagine how many were not.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 15:51:40 ago (+0/-0)
Anybody who can't see that this is a form of protection racket is an absolute moron. Legitimately, if Nick is splitting hairs about this, he has lost a ton of credibility with me. The right answer is that this topic isn't on the table for anybody serious.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 10:25:58 ago (+1/-1)*
Look at Owens running around saying Epstein gave money to Baal and was part of a baby eating cabal. That stupid shit will backfire on her and anyone advocating for her.
Epstein was a criminal and is now dead. No one is saying that what he did wasn't bad, wrong, immoral, criminal and part of an international conspiracy to blackmail rich and powerful people.
And, the point that Fuentes was making was exactly that this bullshit being put out all over the internet is what is obfuscating what matters most. And, what matters most is NOT that Epstein was a pedophile. What matters most is that he was part of an Israeli led effort to blackmail rich and powerful people for the benefit of Israel. What matters is that Epstein was loyal to Israel and using his fellow jews to place himself in positions where he could get extortion material to control US policy for his fellow jews. What matters is that Epstein was a jew and he and his jew friends hated the goy. That matters far more than labeling him, a dead guy, as a pedophile instead of a hebefile, ya fuckin' idiot.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO -1 points 2 daysFeb 4, 2026 10:31:58 ago (+0/-1)*
What's your evidence?
It could support: this is a criminal who intends to shoot me and my family
It could also support: this is an undercover cop who is in hot pursuit of a maniac that's hiding in the pantry of my home right now; he is here to protect us
What do you do?
You shoot the fucker.
Why? Because given what your enemies do to you (if that's what he is), you don't have the resources to investigate. You have a duty to your family. You shoot.
It's the same here. You give yourself the benefit of the doubt. Jeffrey Epstein had a fucking weird island temple where they did sexual rituals with teens and also trafficked them around the world.
YOU FUCKING SHOOT. You saying that we should only go after his Jewish-supremacy is like saying you should only put one bullet in the guy crawling through your window. NO. EMPTY THE CLIP.
War is a game. You get opportunities. When your enemy is weak, you strike. This is probably the strongest reason I have for finding Fuentes pretty suspect at this exact time. Why? Because he is smart enough to know that now is not the time you start splitting hairs over the precise kind of sexual deviancy you attribute to your FUCKING ENEMY. That is nothing but giving away the moment and the opportunity so we can masturbate about labels.
Smarten up.
[ + ] Hermes
[ - ] Hermes 0 points 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 15:37:17 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra 0 points 1 dayFeb 4, 2026 15:49:37 ago (+0/-0)