×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
19

Putting people in bikinis is free speech

submitted by Niggly_Puff to whatever 1 monthJan 10, 2026 14:11:21 ago (+21/-2)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/5g0cl6.png

Yet posting a happy merchant will get your account blocked....


23 comments block


[ - ] Rob3122 1 point 1 monthJan 10, 2026 14:57:15 ago (+2/-1)

Nothing good comes from AI

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1 monthJan 10, 2026 20:42:56 ago (+1/-0)

Hilarious form of disobedience.

[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 1 monthJan 10, 2026 23:52:31 ago (+1/-0)

Looks like a lesbian

[ - ] glooper 2 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 14:57:51 ago (+3/-1)

Just a reminder, the UK and the EU does NOT in fact, have codified "free speech"...


Point in fact, only 33 countries on the planet of Sol 3, out of the 198, actually have "free speech" codified.


[ - ] dulcima 5 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 16:03:50 ago (+5/-0)

It's different because both Starmer and Albo are upset like little girls at this new level of trolling via Grok.

Both our countries are on the point of an X ban.

[ - ] BulletStopper 2 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 17:54:44 ago (+2/-0)

TFW they put you in a bikini and you just look like an old lesbian.

[ - ] Peleg 1 point 1 monthJan 10, 2026 18:30:50 ago (+1/-0)

Ttytt at first glance I thought it was some old lesbo.

Now I need some eye bleach!

[ - ] fnbs 2 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 19:02:21 ago (+2/-0)

Fuck you Elon, the master of suppressing free speech on X

[ - ] con77 3 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 16:33:36 ago (+3/-0)

Hahaaa! Fuck that globalist scum

[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 14:15:45 ago (+5/-0)

Yup. Can't criticize jews. Not allowed.

[ - ] dulcima 5 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 15:59:03 ago (+5/-0)

Don't know about the happy merchant meme on X, but other forms of jew hatred on X is posted all the time.

[ - ] dulcima 5 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 16:01:53 ago (+5/-0)

Not so fast.

Both Australia and the UK govts are seriously considering banning X because of the bikini pics of Albo and Starmer.

Although it's likely more than that - Albo and Starmer are constantly mocked in a number of ways on X. Grok just provided a new level of mockery.

[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] 3 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 16:16:15 ago (+3/-0)

I have had my fair share of fun with AI. And I consider myself a free speech absolutist. But I think normalizing these types of edits is bad for society. Bikinis is just the tip of the ice berg. You can literally edit anyone you want into a hardcore porn video. Should it be illegal? Probably not. But corporations should be held to a higher standard... and maybe POSTING such things without consent should be illegal. It's tricky.

[ - ] dulcima 3 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 16:21:48 ago (+3/-0)

I agree with that, and creeps on X have been doing exactly that.

However that is not what Starmer and Albo are upset about. They're taking offence personally.

Musk has said he's working on Grok to stop people asking the AI to undress people.

[ - ] Wahaha 2 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 16:41:39 ago (+2/-0)

I don't think the existing rules are insufficient. This is called libel not free speech.

[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] 2 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 16:54:29 ago (+2/-0)

This is called libel not free speech.

Good point. That is hard to argue against.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 1 monthJan 10, 2026 23:06:32 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] 0 points 1 monthJan 10, 2026 23:10:56 ago (+0/-0)

What? You're not making sense.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 monthJan 11, 2026 00:02:52 ago (+1/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] -2 points 1 monthJan 11, 2026 00:17:57 ago (+0/-2)

That's an 80 IQ take. And you don't understand twitter. People are able to activate the bot on your post or any post by just pinging it. Now that wholesome picture of your wife or daughter at church has been instantly changed to her in a bikini for all to see. It doesn't matter whether you like it or not. It's a real thing that is happening.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 monthJan 11, 2026 00:27:29 ago (+1/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Niggly_Puff [op] -2 points 1 monthJan 11, 2026 00:30:11 ago (+0/-2)

You're proposing only the government or a select few (Mossad) and criminals have access to deep fakes,

You must have less than 80 IQ because I never said that.

Should it be illegal? Probably not. But corporations should be held to a higher standard... and maybe POSTING such things without consent should be illegal.

Reading comprehension much?

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1 monthJan 11, 2026 00:43:50 ago (+1/-1)

deleted