In quantum theory particle entanglement occurs when a subatomic particle decays into two daughter particles the daughter particles are said to be entangled. When particles are entangled measuring one will effect the other over distance and the communication between the entangled particles has been determined to exceed the speed of light. Einstein referred to this as the spooky action at a distance. Known as the EPR paradox (Einstein, Poldolsky, Rosen) Entanglement can and does occur when two particles encounter one another, interact and then separate. I believe that the microverse is a reflection of the universe. It's all tied together. Perhaps understanding the quantum level will provide us insight into ourselves and our perceptions of our surroundings. We are all intertwined. It's amusing that quantum particle physics reinforces my conviction and belief of the truth of everything Jesus Christ said some 2000 years ago. Most think that science and God are in opposition, my thought is that one cannot fail to explain the other. (God explains science, science explains God).
The problem is that so few reflect on this phenomenon and can only see the Boogeyman not the energy or how it moves or why and under what circumstances it can be accelerated or slowed down. Way too deep for this crowd... I enjoyed your post though :)
Einstein and his theories have been disproven. His theory of relativity has nothing to do with relativistic physics. A nice old JOO who was ultimately wrong.
einstein was a fraud and a blackmailed kike who stole 2 patents from the patent office he worked in before he ever became known
The Theory of the Aether is the correct Theory of Everything, not realativism.
No, it reinforces nothing about your beliefs, it created the heliocentric model which fundamentally denies the existence of God and any scientific proof that may point to his existence
The Aether is the word of God, it was what was created in the beginning when God said "let there be light" the aether is "the light"
the aether is the fundamental foundation upon which all physical reality stands, without "the word" there would be nothing
This is by far, one of the dumbest things I have read here. Relativity can be measured and replicated. What experiments can I run to prove an "Aether?"
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 15:50:21 ago (+1/-0)
People are lucky to get a reply from me within 3 days. (or unlucky, as the case may be) 30 minutes is more of an extreme online thing.
The theory of relativity didn't disprove aether, but it provided a simpler explanation that didn't require an absolute omnipresent medium for the motion of light. Einstein proposed that light traveled at a constant speed through a vacuum, and that everything is moving relative to everything else.
Einstein being wrong doesn't necessarily require an Aether to exist. But we really don't know the specific details of how 'all things are held together', and are unlikely to.
It's like when I ask flat earth morons to show me some math and experiments I can run, never an answer. One guy here went on about there is no gravity, but only "density and buoyancy" I asked for the math that would tell me how much energy it takes to raise 1kg to 100 km under their theory and they simply could not provide any.
Time dilation in the satellites that run the GPS system.
Without adjusting the clocks to run just slightly faster on those satellites the GPS ends up being off by Kilometers per day. Yes, I am well aware we only have their word to go on for this. I don't own any satellites, sue me.
Don't attack me with the whole space is fake and gay thing either. I have seen some eyebrow raising evidence that suggests the ISS is a greenscreen stage and the astronauts are actors, but I'm still on the fence about it. Anyway, I don't feel like fighting about this one just now.
That's the thing, I don't like taking another's explanation for something without my due diligence. For something to be accepted, it has to be consistent with natural laws. So if can explain something in practical terms that is consistent with natural laws, then there's a high probability that I'll accept it. Sometimes things that seem counterintuitive on the surface are logically consistent because the mechanism behind the process isn't well or fully understood.
Take turbine engines, it has been found, experimentally that injecting compressor air into the combustor increases turbine enfficiency. You'd think this isn't right because thermal expansion drives a turbine. However, this is not correct fully, the turbine is driven by pressure differential, so the expansion ratio of the turbine becomes the main driving factor. So injecting cool air(relative to the turbine exhaust gases) improves efficiency because the increased mass flow, increased density creates a bigger pressure differential. So turbine power is increased despite a decrease in turbine inlet temperature(TIT).
Regardless if Einstein progenerated the theory, used other peoples ideas, of simply stole them from his wife. They are attributed to him. Their origins do not change their veracity.
No. We don't just allow immoral thieves to take credit for other's work. We punish them. Since all jews are one thing, we can punish all jews for that and their constant thefts; especially of light and energy. All the Gods are pissed at them over that.
Quantum 'woo' is the new mysticism. Look... Science has never and probably will never indicate the existence of anything spiritual/non-physical. The fact that it can't explain the entirety of ontology is in no way a confirmation of your wishful thinking.
If you believe, then just believe. Have faith. Sensationalizing science to lend your mysticism a facade of logical credibility is just pathetic.
[ + ] Nasturtium
[ - ] Nasturtium 0 points 2.1 yearsApr 4, 2023 01:51:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Outlaw_Aryan
[ - ] Outlaw_Aryan 5 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 10:31:17 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 4 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 10:11:36 ago (+4/-0)
The Theory of the Aether is the correct Theory of Everything, not realativism.
No, it reinforces nothing about your beliefs, it created the heliocentric model which fundamentally denies the existence of God and any scientific proof that may point to his existence
The Aether is the word of God, it was what was created in the beginning when God said "let there be light" the aether is "the light"
the aether is the fundamental foundation upon which all physical reality stands, without "the word" there would be nothing
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 10:31:41 ago (+4/-1)*
[ + ] PhantomXLII
[ - ] PhantomXLII 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 11:04:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 15:50:21 ago (+1/-0)
Einstein being wrong doesn't necessarily require an Aether to exist. But we really don't know the specific details of how 'all things are held together', and are unlikely to.
[ + ] ghetto_shitlord
[ - ] ghetto_shitlord -2 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 11:53:49 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 14:16:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Aze
[ - ] Aze 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 17:46:59 ago (+0/-0)
Without adjusting the clocks to run just slightly faster on those satellites the GPS ends up being off by Kilometers per day. Yes, I am well aware we only have their word to go on for this. I don't own any satellites, sue me.
Don't attack me with the whole space is fake and gay thing either. I have seen some eyebrow raising evidence that suggests the ISS is a greenscreen stage and the astronauts are actors, but I'm still on the fence about it. Anyway, I don't feel like fighting about this one just now.
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2023 12:25:02 ago (+0/-0)
Take turbine engines, it has been found, experimentally that injecting compressor air into the combustor increases turbine enfficiency. You'd think this isn't right because thermal expansion drives a turbine. However, this is not correct fully, the turbine is driven by pressure differential, so the expansion ratio of the turbine becomes the main driving factor. So injecting cool air(relative to the turbine exhaust gases) improves efficiency because the increased mass flow, increased density creates a bigger pressure differential. So turbine power is increased despite a decrease in turbine inlet temperature(TIT).
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 2, 2023 22:35:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 11:18:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 12:43:32 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 11:05:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Ozark
[ - ] Ozark 3 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 10:10:26 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Pasty
[ - ] Pasty 1 point 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 11:12:45 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] yesiknow
[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 12:22:27 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Peleg
[ - ] Peleg 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 18:53:11 ago (+0/-0)
— Matthew 24:27 (KJV)
[ + ] Laputois
[ - ] Laputois [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 20:56:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 13:53:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] anrach
[ - ] anrach 0 points 2.2 yearsMar 1, 2023 12:08:08 ago (+0/-0)
If you believe, then just believe. Have faith. Sensationalizing science to lend your mysticism a facade of logical credibility is just pathetic.