Sign into an existing account

I've noticed a pattern in their posts. Both appear to be trying to normalize porn and destroy morality in others.
The vector of attack that blueman chooses is to obfuscate the meaning of porn, and try to pass it off as art. He then uses the kike definitions of porn in an attempt to gaslight others into accepting its presence. Of course, the definition he pushes makes porn mean simultaneously everything, and nothing.
The real definition of porn is any sexual degeneracy, ranging from nudity, to sexual acts.

McCarthy uses less wordplay, and instead chooses to try and convince everyone that there is nothing wrong with it. Everything is of course wrong with it. Loose morals, especially those that are sexual in nature, have played a major role in the downfall of every civilization in history. Prudishness is fundamental to keeping a group alive, especially Europeans.
His pushing of degeneracy onto others is clearly an attempt to get men, especially young men, to go down self destructive paths.

Both appear to be working towards normalizing porn and degeneracy. Worse still, both appear to be working towards normalizing pedophilia.
In Blueman's case, it's very obvious that he's doing it. The Mark Ryden "art" he uploads is clearly drawn child pornography.
McCarthy seems to have flown a bit under the radar, probably due to how much porn he uploads and how many news articles he spams. However, a couple of his recent uploads were "barely legal" videos, a trend I expect will continue.

I know McCarthy is a kike, both from his degenerative spam, his methods of deflection when he gets called out, i.e. saying what you're saying makes no sense that you're crazy etc., and his extreme over reaction to being called a kike.
Blueman seems to working for the same ends as McCarthy, and his method of deflection is both to obfuscate and to accuse others of what he is guilty of, i.e. "if you dislike the pedophilic porn I upload, it means you're a pedophile". So I strongly suspect Blueman of not only being a kike, but also working for the same group as McCarthy.

As someone else pointed out, and I'm forgetting who, the combination of pedophilic, to very close to being pedophilic porn, leads me to believe if they can't succeed in pushing degeneracy, they'll opt for taking both Voat and catbox down with real child pornography.

Which leads me to my last point, has anyone contacted the owner of catbox? If not, let me know and I'll write him an email. Given their behavior, I suspect he'll want to keep a close eye on both accounts, if not flat out terminate them.