×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
36

Rights come from the end of a blade or a barrel, they come not from the document put before the king, from the sword that sits above the kings head, threatening to come down upon him should he not pay respect to what the document says.

submitted by Paradoxical003 to whatever 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 15:59:32 ago (+36/-0)     (whatever)

Not from God, but from those on Earth who do his work. Stop idly praying for a miracle, you are the miracle, if filled with the holy spirit then God lives in you, God won't fight your battles for you, but he will fight beside you.

"We the people" is an implied threat to would be tyrants who abuse their stations.

Do you want a comfortable death? Or a glorious one? Will you let the light take you gently? Or will you rage against it with all you have, even knowing the chances of victory are slim?

Do you want to live forever? Are you a man, or a mouse?


13 comments block


[ - ] redgreenpill 2 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 17:08:52 ago (+2/-0)

Yeah but if you can convince other people to use their sword on behalf of your wishes, it's just as good.

[ - ] Prairie 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:44:42 ago (+1/-0)

The document is to forestall having to use the blade or barrel.

[ - ] Teefinyomouf 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 14:03:21 ago (+0/-0)

Rights aren't the result of violence. They're justification for it. Reread the declaration of independence. It's justification for war. Without rights it's merely two factions fighting for power and no one is the good guy. If that's your view then wouldn't it be better to stay that rights don't exist, only struggle does?

[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 21, 2022 01:05:34 ago (+0/-0)

You'd be able to put it that way.

But I prefer to say that the perspectives which outlast the others get to determine who was right and wrong in any previous conflict.

Typically those perspectives belong to the oned who had been the victors of those conflicts (but not always).

They get to day what constitutes a right and what doesn't, and they can only do so for as long as they can defend these rights with force.

Violence creates rights, and violence destroys rights, but more often, it is the tool by which the nature of rights are rewritten.

The ink of a right is the blood of those who would infringe upon them.

Same thing with God, he exists if the dominant perspective is that he does, his nature is decided just as his existence is, if everyone thinks that God made them and the world, it retroactively becomes so. At leasy until a different perspective seizes control over the narrative.

The devil (whose existence abd nature are similarly tethered to the dominant beleif) seeks to usurp God by changing places with him, getting people think of the devil as being God, and God as being the devil.

There are three realities.
The first is the one that exists, this one is not directly accessible to us.
The second is the one that is perceived, this one is the reality you are trapped in, you can only experience this reality and no other.
The third reality is the one that is expressed, it's the one people talk about, and could be seen as the collective alternative to the personal reality mentioned here as being the second kind, this reality has the ability to affect the personal realities of those who live in its reach of influence, though the reverse is also true.
God is real, and he resides over the third reality, rights are real, and they exist as a part of the third reality as well.
What is true in the objective sense matters, of course, but each of us could only approximate what is objectively true, and that approximation is what is subjectively true from our point of reference, the objective truth is forever out of our reach, for even when we grasp it, we could not be certain that that is what we have comprehended.
Only God knows.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 20:03:27 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 21:13:01 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 17:48:37 ago (+0/-0)

Great post!

[ - ] Roy_Batty 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 16:03:29 ago (+0/-0)

Tell damocles to sit still while we borrow that sword of his...

[ - ] TankTinker -3 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 17:50:30 ago (+0/-3)*

"Rights come from the end of a blade or a barrel" .. resonates with the Paul Joseph Watson Video, Freedom Grows Out of the Barrel of a Gun, there are around a half million ppl on Death Row or doing life in American prisons, they had a gun or a knife but they ain't free and they sure as shootin' don't have any "rights."

Gun ownership increases yr suicide risk exponentially as well it increases the likelihood of you being shot by the police, I will not have a gun thus if there is a shooting anywhere close it wasn't me firing, which similarly reduces the chance of being charged with any offense .. Watson's freedom should be curtailed for firstly embracing 911 Truth then dropping the ball, it was Jews.

[ - ] Reawakened 1 point 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 22:10:39 ago (+2/-1)

What kind of special pussy are you? That was the stupidest jumble of English words I've had the misfortune to gaze upon in a long time.

[ - ] TankTinker 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:01:07 ago (+0/-0)*

So what are you all gunners gonna do .. if you believe gun ownership will cause the government to cower in fear you have got it all wrong, Jews are behind the guns guns guns lobby because they own the firearms manufacturing plants, as well they know all a gun will ever do is bring trouble and they thrive on trouble. Johnny Cash - Devil's Right Hand.

Ok suppose you follow the Jew's instructions and arm y'self, against whom would you intend to deploy yr weaponry .. first "they" slaughtered millions of American children in Zionist sponsored abortion clinics, then brought immigrants in to make up the numbers whose allegiance is not to the host nation but to the foreign culture whence they came.

When patriots have taken up arms they suffered arrest and swift execution .. so what impetus will cause you to open fire, as well understand in times of anarchy private armies manned by mercenaries rapidly form, they establish fiefdoms and start issuing orders whence recalcitrance, truculence, intransigence or intractability meet immediate execution .. thus privateers will have no future no matter how many guns they own.

[ - ] Reawakened 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 20, 2022 07:49:05 ago (+0/-0)

Good thing the Taliban didn't have guns because they suffered arrest and swift execution, just like the sandinistas and the Communist Chinese, and the IRA, and the National Socialists, and the founding fathers and ... The only two things standing in your way are history and facts, otherwise your model is nearly correct. All you jews are the same. Transparent as a fart with the same endearing characteristics.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.2 yearsFeb 19, 2022 23:33:57 ago (+0/-0)

go move to a 3rd world communist shit hole

You arent welcome in america