Look, noone is denying that Brawndo has what plants crave. This much is true; plants most certainly crave Brawndo.
What I'm arguing, is that what plants crave, isn't electrolytes, at all. In fact, there has been 0 documented cases of Brawndo having ANY of these supposed 'electrolytes'.
Yes, SCOTUS let them do it essentially. Medical rights are not in the constitution, so now we see medical institutions being used as the vessel to transfer wealth to the banking class, under the guise of short term "help for the poor"
Yeah that link is from the last one but they have issued a new one today that goes into October... Just saw it on the news. Should be on their website soon
In a properly functioning society with good jobs for men, young women for marriage, and affordable homes, renting, and therefore landlords, would serve a useful purpose...we have none of those things in a large enough supply to matter though.
renting, and therefore landlords, would serve a useful purpose
Nope. The phenomenon didn't exist with any capacity until the 1800s or so, when jews started pushing (((wanderlust))), as renting is useless except for people living in a place that they have no roots or background in. Everyone else lived with family, and bought houses cash (this didn't disappear until the 1900s)
Anyway, the (((wanderlust))) didn't take, so they used high-profile examples (e.g. the (((Bohemians))) ), but these people were viewed (rightly) with scorn as vagrants and vagabonds. This is the origin of the 'starving artist' meme - it is centuries old, and was making fun of the jewish examples. It never quite worked out the way it did in the jew-written fantasy novels (which typically had someone wandering from home to some new land, becoming successful, and getting into adventures).
Your comment was interesting, but this is mainly what I meant when I said "serve a purpose":
as renting is useless except for people living in a place that they have no roots or background in.
This might be more of an American thing to, but a young man who can hold down a job and put a roof over his head by renting a basic apartment...at least post WWII...was marketing himself as a potential husband. The idea being, once married they'd buy a house and start making babies.
That's not really true. Renting was less common and tended to be shorter term, but it did exist. There was also a great deal of tenant farmers and sharecroppers all over europe.
And even if everyone settled down and bought their own house as soon as they left home, it'd still make sense to finance it through a savings and loan institution, which is basically renting with extra steps.
Renting was less common and tended to be shorter term, but it did exist.
I had trouble finding the right words there - I should have used 'wasn't popular' as opposed to 'didn't exist with any capacity'. I was trying to convey the niche aspect of things, that wasn't common amongst the larger population.
There was also a great deal of tenant farmers and sharecroppers all over europe.
True, plus a large number of kids and young adults who moved to the cities to work in factories in the northern states, which were the largest population of 'renters' over here (wasn't called renting at the time, and was viewed negatively). This, of course, evolved out the mining era when companies would literally provide everything for their employees, sometimes even building an entire city around their plant, but the employees pay would be docked in return. It was seen as predatory back then, and had another term which escapes me now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_town
it'd still make sense to finance it through a savings and loan institution, which is basically renting with extra steps.
Though I agree with the latter, I don't agree with the 'it made sense' part, as people trying to finance houses is exactly why mortgages were unpopular and people bought cash. In short, before (((President Rosenfeld))) reformed mortgages, house loans were for 50% of value, over short terms (like 5ish years), and had a balloon payment. If you couldn't make the balloon payment, you lost your home and all 'equity' you thought you had. It was jews directly fleecing Whites - post 'reform', they had to become more subtle (and this is when financing became popular, since the credit buyer can always outbid the cash buyer, and credit was now backed by the feds).
That's fair. And you did give me some interesting thoughts. I think that in a healthy economy renting probably should be much more of an exception than the rule. If it's the rule then it means either there's a gross generational imbalance in income, or that the housing market is being made unacceptably risky in some way.
I never really saw the gripe about company towns and company stores: If they're so unacceptable wouldn't they just end up driving their employees away? Like... I get that higher prices might feel like being taken advantage of, but even with a purely third party housing and goods economy it'd always be higher in some out of the way place without transport routes.
Though I agree with the latter, I don't agree with the 'it made sense' part, as people trying to finance houses is exactly why mortgages were unpopular and people bought cash.
Well, the idea of a functional mortgage is that a young couple starting out will be cash poor but have a lot of potential earnings, whereas someone close to retiring will be cash rich but have poor future earnings. It's a sensible swap which ensures that no matter what happens to the value of money they'll be supported in retirement and the couple will be able to cover their payments.
In short, before (((President Rosenfeld))) reformed mortgages, house loans were for 50% of value, over short terms (like 5ish years), and had a balloon payment. If you couldn't make the balloon payment, you lost your home and all 'equity' you thought you had. It was jews directly fleecing Whites - post 'reform', they had to become more subtle (and this is when financing became popular, since the credit buyer can always outbid the cash buyer, and credit was now backed by the feds).
The issue Roosevelt (I agree probably a crypto) was trying to deal with was that the great depression had made banks very cautious, so they weren't giving out huge loans. He "fixed" the problem by taking over their traditional risk assessment function and transferring it to the executive branch, then making up for that by guaranteeing loans with public money.
So yes, he made loans cheap and easy, but the price being paid there is that all the bad loans eventually get heaped onto the taxpayer.
I think that if we brought banking back to a community level divided along racial lines (like it used to be) and savings and loans were matching local savers to local businesses and home-makers using sound money then it'd probably work a lot better.
It'd be illegal as hell to do that these days, but who knows, maybe it could be done under the counter with gold or crypto somehow.
Actually, I just realised how it could be done, possibly completely legally. If the "bank" were acting purely as a matchmaker, like a dating agency, and the actual loan itself were a purely private contract between two individuals then most banking laws wouldn't apply.
So it'd go something like this: You make a profile on a loan site, you'd jump through some verification hoops confirming your identity and income/savings, then the site would start matching you with lenders or borrowers depending on your goals. You get to meet the other side, assess them (with some advice from the loan site). Then if you find them trustworthy you sign a contract and that's that. Site might take a commission or something to keep the lights on, but they never act as a bank in the formal sense.
Lenders and borrowers would be free to spread their risk however they like with local people they have a social connection with and they have a lot more freedom than a regulated business to turn down anyone they don't like.
It could also solve the problem of big jewish banks cutting off conservative businesses and gun stores and such.
You just described exactly how ethnic lending (not sure of term) works. Essentially, Indian communities do this when not in India (those gas stations are actually funded by their Indian buddies) and similarly for jews.
The 'matchmaking' portion, where you propose an app as a platform, here uses someone with 'clout' who vouches for you. Basically, they put their money in first, usually also the largest amount, then the 'hat is passed' and everyone else puts in some amount until your goal is met. All you have to do is convince the first guy with 'pull' to go in on you, and he will get the rest of the group to join.
Also there is no usury - Indians are too miserly, and jews believe usury is just for the goyim.
Fuck anyone who works hard, saves their money and invests it in real estate, right Hymie?
Reminder that the (((Real Estate))) scam is the product of New York jewry to further fuck Whites out of money at a time when the income tax hadn't been invented yet. What you describe is literally what (((they))) became known for, and yet you buy into the judaism. Furthermore, if you are playing the rent game and 'only renting to Whites', you are playing their game to the fucking T by only robbing your brothers.
Why not build/create/invent, or otherwise leverage the White genes you (probably) have? This is something the jews can't do.
Cool, free Blackrock houses for all. Find out which ones they own then tell squatters they can have them. The local sheriff won’t be getting them out unless they are druggies or thieves.
This after the controlled SC refused to hear suit to stop CDC eviction moratorium... because they admittedly thought it was easier doing the illegal thing than doing the harder legal thing.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 09:10:33 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] Aze
[ - ] Aze 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 23:42:12 ago (+0/-0)
I ready for this mfer to burn down under the weight of its own ineptitude.
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 08:07:16 ago (+3/-0)
Brawndo: it has what plants crave!
[ + ] MichaelStewart
[ - ] MichaelStewart 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 11:06:39 ago (+2/-0)
What I'm arguing, is that what plants crave, isn't electrolytes, at all. In fact, there has been 0 documented cases of Brawndo having ANY of these supposed 'electrolytes'.
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 07:18:23 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 07:55:24 ago (+5/-0)
Sounds like they think anything that could impact someone's health (which is anything) is now their sphere of authority.
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 09:49:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GlowNiggerDick
[ - ] GlowNiggerDick 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 11:23:00 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Jiggggg
[ - ] Jiggggg 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 12:33:39 ago (+2/-0)
Edit-
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0803-cdc-eviction-order.html
[ + ] Jiggggg
[ - ] Jiggggg 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 11:41:55 ago (+2/-0)
I feel you man
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 11:10:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] obscenity
[ - ] obscenity 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 09:22:33 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 09:39:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 13:54:58 ago (+1/-0)
Nope. The phenomenon didn't exist with any capacity until the 1800s or so, when jews started pushing (((wanderlust))), as renting is useless except for people living in a place that they have no roots or background in. Everyone else lived with family, and bought houses cash (this didn't disappear until the 1900s)
Anyway, the (((wanderlust))) didn't take, so they used high-profile examples (e.g. the (((Bohemians))) ), but these people were viewed (rightly) with scorn as vagrants and vagabonds. This is the origin of the 'starving artist' meme - it is centuries old, and was making fun of the jewish examples. It never quite worked out the way it did in the jew-written fantasy novels (which typically had someone wandering from home to some new land, becoming successful, and getting into adventures).
Fun painting I found on wiki, called 'The Poor Poet', and dates to 1839: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garret#/media/File:Carl_Spitzweg_-_Der_arme_Poet_(Neue_Pinakothek).jpg
Remember the Bohemians (((migrated))) from France in the 1800s.
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 13:58:51 ago (+1/-0)
This might be more of an American thing to, but a young man who can hold down a job and put a roof over his head by renting a basic apartment...at least post WWII...was marketing himself as a potential husband. The idea being, once married they'd buy a house and start making babies.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 16:34:34 ago (+1/-0)
And even if everyone settled down and bought their own house as soon as they left home, it'd still make sense to finance it through a savings and loan institution, which is basically renting with extra steps.
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 19:51:23 ago (+2/-0)
I had trouble finding the right words there - I should have used 'wasn't popular' as opposed to 'didn't exist with any capacity'. I was trying to convey the niche aspect of things, that wasn't common amongst the larger population.
True, plus a large number of kids and young adults who moved to the cities to work in factories in the northern states, which were the largest population of 'renters' over here (wasn't called renting at the time, and was viewed negatively). This, of course, evolved out the mining era when companies would literally provide everything for their employees, sometimes even building an entire city around their plant, but the employees pay would be docked in return. It was seen as predatory back then, and had another term which escapes me now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_town
Though I agree with the latter, I don't agree with the 'it made sense' part, as people trying to finance houses is exactly why mortgages were unpopular and people bought cash. In short, before (((President Rosenfeld))) reformed mortgages, house loans were for 50% of value, over short terms (like 5ish years), and had a balloon payment. If you couldn't make the balloon payment, you lost your home and all 'equity' you thought you had. It was jews directly fleecing Whites - post 'reform', they had to become more subtle (and this is when financing became popular, since the credit buyer can always outbid the cash buyer, and credit was now backed by the feds).
Tons of interesting history there.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 22:27:24 ago (+2/-0)
I never really saw the gripe about company towns and company stores: If they're so unacceptable wouldn't they just end up driving their employees away? Like... I get that higher prices might feel like being taken advantage of, but even with a purely third party housing and goods economy it'd always be higher in some out of the way place without transport routes.
Well, the idea of a functional mortgage is that a young couple starting out will be cash poor but have a lot of potential earnings, whereas someone close to retiring will be cash rich but have poor future earnings. It's a sensible swap which ensures that no matter what happens to the value of money they'll be supported in retirement and the couple will be able to cover their payments.
The issue Roosevelt (I agree probably a crypto) was trying to deal with was that the great depression had made banks very cautious, so they weren't giving out huge loans. He "fixed" the problem by taking over their traditional risk assessment function and transferring it to the executive branch, then making up for that by guaranteeing loans with public money.
So yes, he made loans cheap and easy, but the price being paid there is that all the bad loans eventually get heaped onto the taxpayer.
I think that if we brought banking back to a community level divided along racial lines (like it used to be) and savings and loans were matching local savers to local businesses and home-makers using sound money then it'd probably work a lot better.
It'd be illegal as hell to do that these days, but who knows, maybe it could be done under the counter with gold or crypto somehow.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2021 06:54:04 ago (+1/-0)
So it'd go something like this: You make a profile on a loan site, you'd jump through some verification hoops confirming your identity and income/savings, then the site would start matching you with lenders or borrowers depending on your goals. You get to meet the other side, assess them (with some advice from the loan site). Then if you find them trustworthy you sign a contract and that's that. Site might take a commission or something to keep the lights on, but they never act as a bank in the formal sense.
Lenders and borrowers would be free to spread their risk however they like with local people they have a social connection with and they have a lot more freedom than a regulated business to turn down anyone they don't like.
It could also solve the problem of big jewish banks cutting off conservative businesses and gun stores and such.
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2021 13:57:23 ago (+0/-0)
The 'matchmaking' portion, where you propose an app as a platform, here uses someone with 'clout' who vouches for you. Basically, they put their money in first, usually also the largest amount, then the 'hat is passed' and everyone else puts in some amount until your goal is met. All you have to do is convince the first guy with 'pull' to go in on you, and he will get the rest of the group to join.
Also there is no usury - Indians are too miserly, and jews believe usury is just for the goyim.
That said; yes, this is the solution.
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2021 18:08:56 ago (+0/-0)
"Ethnic lending" I like that term.
[ + ] Hobama
[ - ] Hobama 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 13:25:13 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 13:58:12 ago (+0/-0)
I suppose the next decade or so will test all of our definition of 'investment'.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 13:34:39 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] aleleopathic
[ - ] aleleopathic 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 14:04:22 ago (+0/-0)
Reminder that the (((Real Estate))) scam is the product of New York jewry to further fuck Whites out of money at a time when the income tax hadn't been invented yet. What you describe is literally what (((they))) became known for, and yet you buy into the judaism. Furthermore, if you are playing the rent game and 'only renting to Whites', you are playing their game to the fucking T by only robbing your brothers.
Why not build/create/invent, or otherwise leverage the White genes you (probably) have? This is something the jews can't do.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 14:13:49 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 16:31:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SteppingRazor
[ - ] SteppingRazor 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 14:53:25 ago (+0/-0)
The local sheriff won’t be getting them out unless they are druggies or thieves.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user [op] 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 19:46:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Jiggggg
[ - ] Jiggggg 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 12:34:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 09:06:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Thought_Criminal
[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 08:05:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PenisEnvy
[ - ] PenisEnvy 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2021 08:02:22 ago (+0/-0)