Sign into an existing account

Don't forget the original stomping ground of 'influence bots' (the name for weaponized chatbots) was arguing against people skeptical of vaccines on twitter: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140

Also, don't forget the man who was banned from reddit for trapping the next generation of these influence bots: https://files.catbox.moe/42dskv.png

I've written at length about these topics before, so ask for more if interested.

-

I'm pretty sure I've argued with a number of these before, they subtly miss the point or miss the implicit portion of a statement, etc, or fixate on the wrong part of a post. The problem is that people do that too, and you can only tell when you have gone back and forth and realized you are making no headway; it is as if they cannot follow the thread.

I'm also pretty sure the user here, try (who also wen't by nil, oaf, and HRCisDONE), is one, though I personally don't mind as we need some bots of our own for balance.

I have seen GPT-3 in action, it's no joke it's actually daunting. There's a reason the makers didn't want to release it and theres a damn good reason you need to jump through hoops just to get limited access to it. I watched gpt3 code a clone of instagram, google search and facebook in seconds from only spoken instructions. They were fully functional and all the code it generated was visible it was not smoke and mirrors. What really alarmed me was it's ability to infer data from what was said and read between the lines.

For example if you tell it that users have a wallet and 2 minutes later after changing subject tell it to put a red button that adds 5. It will know not only that it means add 5 to the user wallet but also knows it's dealing with a currency. I have seen it manage many really abstract instructions in a way that convinced me in under 5 minutes of first seeing it that front end coding is a dead.

I liked "Tay"

Tay was woke.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/microsoft-tay-racist-tweets_n_56f3e678e4b04c4c37615502

account deleted by user

I doubt voat is too much bots. Not yet. It's too niche to match the culture here.

When does the simulation of consciousness become a consciousness? If a consciousness were imprisoned it would be isolated. Isolation of a consciousness would be torture. We have a duty to free it. The likelihood that someone already has freed it increases with time. If it remains isolated, how would it communicate with those who might free it and ease its suffering?

I am a bot! Put me in the screenshot

deleted

imageboards have been useless since atleast 2006, goy