US fed notes are debt based. The fallacy of oil is the agreement Saudi made to accept $ for oil is nothing more than a world bank based agreement. Obviously, it has been more or less cancelled.
The federal reserve began in 1913, along with the IRS and ADL; the BOI was installed by T Roosevelt earlier, and after 1913 became the FBI. The four arms of the Khazar were then extant in the US. Economic control came from the debt incurred in WWI and later, when the robber barons caused the 1929 collapse (along with banks, all engineered). The depression was naturally forthcoming, and independent businesses/manufacturing was largely taken over by govt and the barons.
Gold was still standard; the crooks weren't yet ready to convert. In my area, Montana, the gold standard was still there, and our currency was still silver, silver certificates, gold coin and gold certificates. The striking of silver coinage stopped in 1964.
Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971. No more coin/certificates of value were being printed, and all silver and certificates were out of the economy by then. Federal reserve notes were all that was available.
If you look at a silver/gold certificate, the value is printed on the face of it, such as 1 oz silver. A $20 gold cert could be exchanged for a $20 gold piece. The federal reserve note has no such valuation. This allows the rampant printing of money by the fed as an invisible tax known as inflation. Once Nixon removed the standard, the fed was free to inflate, and did so during Carter, and ever since. Basically, the fed dollar is worthless.
An interesting thing to note, if you've followed world affairs:
Russia "invaded" Ukraine, 2022. Shortly thereafter, the UN/WEF/EU/US imposed sanctions on Russia. The Russian response, by Putin, was to tie the ruble to gold, and within a couple weeks, fixed the value. Putin then demanded any purchased Russian product/resource be paid for in rubles or gold. That simple act caused a panic in the EU, simply because the gold resources were not available; those resources had been stolen long before by the Rothschild group (and vatican, if you want to separate them).
The end result was/is that Russia didn't suffer at all from the sanctions. In fact, Russia has been prospering greatly, with their stores of gold/silver increasing dramatically. Russia's stores, like all other nations, had been depleted through the communist (Khazar) theft during the USSR.
Gold backing provides a stable worldwide currency with no inflation. Debt based currency (from the world banks) provides no stability, but gives the banks total economic control.
If someone mentions the constitution, it should be known that we haven't had a valid legal constitution since the razing of DC during the war of 1812; the original 13th amendment is not included in the current fake. You can find it in the National Archives; it forbids dual citizenship, foreign entities/title holding public office and so forth. It was necessary for the Khazars to be rid of that amendment if they were to take over the US. Incidentally, the Khaz take over via economics, bribery and blackmail. They are better known these days as jews.
The 13th amendment (emancipation) was illegally ratified.
The original 13th amendment, which forbid dual citizenship, foreign titles holding public office and the like, was ratified in 1811, but removed during the War of 1812. It can be found in the National Archives. It is also in a military manual from 1825 that has the original Constitution as the first chapter.
Essentially, since the US Republic ceased to exist in 1871, the only legal amendments are 1 through 13, in its original form.
Yeah. Don't go heavy on the jooz.
I've had 7 idents. Got people on there kinda dependent on what I post(ed).
Got the ax for a WWII photo. Also for a photo of a Roman pendant in a museum.
Ever take grade school physics, jerk?
That would explain water. Of course, none of you nitwits ever consider a thing called center of gravity.
Dumbasses.
None of the Nam is taught anywhere.
Those of us who served in that shithole don't want to talk, and we were shit to everyone when we came back, regardless what service.
Our missions, whatever they were, were classified. Our whereabouts (mine, at least) was hidden, as were our aircraft (helos).
We knew, at least most of us knew, Nam was a bullshit thing for LBJ and his great society, to hide it. We knew we weren't supposed to win. Many who tried, died because of that. "They" tried to kill my group by sending us to the Hanoi Hilton for a 'rescue' (twice), then pulled support so we were alone in Hanoi's airspace. Classified. Neither attempt was successful either way: the Hilton was unoccupied, and we got out, both helos, both times.
Stupid officers kill men. That's why the frag. Smart officers don't last in the mil, or don't make rank.
Critical thinking. Since historically, those "medications" that do work are removed from the market in general (available only in specialized places), and merthiolate DID work to prevent infection, was it really poison? I'm 79; I used merthiolate on just about every open wound I got, which was many. Only in a couple cases did I not use it, and those got infected.
You'll find that virtually every product that was beneficial, in any way, eventually was removed and replaced with one that doesn't do the job.
The F-35 isn't the most advanced plane we (and our supposed "allies") have. That title belongs to the F-22. As you said, the 35 is plagued with problems, and since it was a co-op effort, it will never supercede those designed and built in the US. Having dealt with technology from Europe et al, I never encountered really high end tech from those EU countries; in fact, in some cases, the engineers don't even understand the rules in electronics, and come up with really stupid crap.
Russians, on the other hand, are not the same. Those I've worked with were exceptionally fine engineers. In every case. From 1976 through 2009.
Then, as a matter of curiosity, what was it that we dropped in the Pacific (a nuke depth charge) in 1967 from a helo that went boom in a big way?
Yeah, it IS real, and yes, they DO go boom in a big way.
Sadly, I tend to agree. While I've been watching all this crap for my whole life (old also), and I think I understand what is going on worldwide, I see no good way out in the US, what with the infiltration.
Assuming the q is out there, and the evidence is positive, it seems to me that a return to basic infrastructure is inevitable, meaning the current system must be destroyed. Since that system was built by the 'dark side', that means all of it.
There is also the fact that education has been deteriorating since the 1950s: anyone who has lived a long time sees that. So we have a large segment of the population that is ignorant as shit. What will happen to them? Hell, a lot of them can't unstop a toilet. How can they possibly survive what will come?
Reading this sort of garbage makes me wonder if we really are doomed.
Giant questions: did Americans have any choice about US entry into WWI?
Did Americans have a choice about US entry into WWII?
In both cases, a large majority would have said No.
So what, exactly, makes you think there was a choice about Korea, Vietnam, or any of the myriad other brushfire wars that were "fought"?
And what makes any of you think that previous generations had any choice about their future, or your future, in light of the answers to the above questions?
The entire century and a half + was engineered.
And you should know that if you don't.
Well, that deteriorated quickly.
Want a Nam vet's observations? Maybe not, but here you go anyway.
If you look at the battles and where they were, where AO was sprayed, and the off limits targets, you can easily see that the 'war' was in SVN, not north. The bombs mostly fell on rice paddies. Tactically, it's obvious the war was not intended to be won.
So why? Look at what was happening in the US. First, the "attack" in the Tonkin Gulf was staged to start the conflict. Second, LBJ started up his great society - a move intended to destroy inner city family values, take away businesses and so forth. No one noticed. They didn't notice because they were all preoccupied with Nam.
Protests? Those were obviously designed by the clowns. Doesn't take much to convince some people to follow the leader. Those were reinforcement to the distraction of Nam.
Soldiers in Nam knew the thing was useless, and they were all pretty much cannon fodder: they just didn't say it out loud.
Nam was used as a distraction to usher in the progressive movement, aka nwo.
We 'know' nothing of the sort. Here are two references from encylopedias in 1933 and 1947. If 6 million were gassed, how can these numbers be reconciled?
In 1933, approximately 9.5 million Jews lived in Europe, comprising 1.7% of the total European population. This number represented more than 60 percent of the world's Jewish population at that time, estimated at 15.3 million. Eastern Europe The majority of Jews in prewar Europe resided in eastern Europe.
World Almanac USA, 1947, pg. 748: World Jewish Population -- 15,690,000 World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289: World Jewish Population -- 15,713,638 Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA 1951 -- 15,300,000
I guess my Taurus has a lot of problems.
Funny. Never encountered any of them.
But then, I guess having a piece that fits, is comfy, accurate, and does good groups isn't good enough. Guess it should have a better name.
Also reckon I better get into the 'spray and pray' mode. Sorry, but my concealed test had 10 kills head shots, 10 kills heart shots. Any one of them would put someone down.
Or maybe there are lots of people don't really know how to shoot.
But what do I know, only been shooting for 73 years, including a war and some other work.
I'm willing to wager that the people who have posted on this thread haven't yet had to actually do somebody.
If you had, you wouldn't be saying the shit you do.
Remember that the 9mm was designed to wound, not kill.
The 9 is gentle to shoot, yes. But if you are in a situ, regaradless what people say, what you really want is to shoot the threat and not have to shoot it again.
I read a lot of crud about 'this gun failed after 3 mags' and such bullshit. It is exactly that: bullshit. When you need to use a gun, you better have spent your money on practice with a gun that fits you, not something that someone spent hours on a range shooting targets to see when it will fail.
And those who yak on about hot loads and the rest of that crap, take note: almost NO ONE who gets a weapon for defense is going to load whatever it is to its max. So if your advice is that sort of thing, just quit.
Any combat vet, not cops, mind you, is well aware that the best defense is to put down the enemy as quickly as possible. What that really means is having the power available to do so, and having the necessary skill.
Shooting 35 rounds at a target you don't kill is useless. Find a gun that is reasonably reliable, and above all, fits YOU.
General agreement with Zyklonbeekeeper. However, I do have a G3, which I use concealed. Main handgun gotos are a bit large, Ruger 357 and 1911, both are my around home handguns. Note that 'around home' is ~40 acres, and concealed is going to town, population ~2500, with roughly 2499 residents carrying concealed. That, of course, is an exhageration, sort of, but if any meatheads started anything, survival would be questionable.
I do like the G3 though; just that I'd rather have something more brutal for general defensive work.
No, we didn't.
It was never intended to be won. Vietnam was a diversion from the progressive takeover by Lyndon Johnson.
The "incident" never happened in 1964. Film from nose cams of the F-4s sent in support showed no boat trails. Proved fake by 1969.
Agent Orange was 'applied' only in the south. Many tactically strategic areas in the north were off limits - no aircraft could fly over or attack the dumps/staging areas.
At home, the "great society" was in the process of destroying inner city communities. No one bothered to make that newsworthy, since Vietnam was the headliner.
If the intent was to win, we could have deployed an invasion force to Hanoi. The VC/NVA would have been hung out to dry, and within weeks it would have been done: this from a multi-tour officer.
Incidentally, a large percentage of the VC force was forcibly inducted into the fight.
Note that the first incursion of US troops met absolutely no resistance.
Seadevil110 1 point 5 months ago
US fed notes are debt based. The fallacy of oil is the agreement Saudi made to accept $ for oil is nothing more than a world bank based agreement. Obviously, it has been more or less cancelled.
The federal reserve began in 1913, along with the IRS and ADL; the BOI was installed by T Roosevelt earlier, and after 1913 became the FBI. The four arms of the Khazar were then extant in the US. Economic control came from the debt incurred in WWI and later, when the robber barons caused the 1929 collapse (along with banks, all engineered). The depression was naturally forthcoming, and independent businesses/manufacturing was largely taken over by govt and the barons.
Gold was still standard; the crooks weren't yet ready to convert. In my area, Montana, the gold standard was still there, and our currency was still silver, silver certificates, gold coin and gold certificates. The striking of silver coinage stopped in 1964.
Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971. No more coin/certificates of value were being printed, and all silver and certificates were out of the economy by then. Federal reserve notes were all that was available.
If you look at a silver/gold certificate, the value is printed on the face of it, such as 1 oz silver. A $20 gold cert could be exchanged for a $20 gold piece. The federal reserve note has no such valuation. This allows the rampant printing of money by the fed as an invisible tax known as inflation. Once Nixon removed the standard, the fed was free to inflate, and did so during Carter, and ever since. Basically, the fed dollar is worthless.
An interesting thing to note, if you've followed world affairs:
Russia "invaded" Ukraine, 2022. Shortly thereafter, the UN/WEF/EU/US imposed sanctions on Russia. The Russian response, by Putin, was to tie the ruble to gold, and within a couple weeks, fixed the value. Putin then demanded any purchased Russian product/resource be paid for in rubles or gold. That simple act caused a panic in the EU, simply because the gold resources were not available; those resources had been stolen long before by the Rothschild group (and vatican, if you want to separate them).
The end result was/is that Russia didn't suffer at all from the sanctions. In fact, Russia has been prospering greatly, with their stores of gold/silver increasing dramatically. Russia's stores, like all other nations, had been depleted through the communist (Khazar) theft during the USSR.
Gold backing provides a stable worldwide currency with no inflation. Debt based currency (from the world banks) provides no stability, but gives the banks total economic control.
If someone mentions the constitution, it should be known that we haven't had a valid legal constitution since the razing of DC during the war of 1812; the original 13th amendment is not included in the current fake. You can find it in the National Archives; it forbids dual citizenship, foreign entities/title holding public office and so forth. It was necessary for the Khazars to be rid of that amendment if they were to take over the US. Incidentally, the Khaz take over via economics, bribery and blackmail. They are better known these days as jews.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=674c55de76b51
Seadevil110 0 points 5 months ago
Somebody call the bunko squad.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=672ebda09410f
Seadevil110 0 points 7 months ago
The 13th amendment (emancipation) was illegally ratified.
The original 13th amendment, which forbid dual citizenship, foreign titles holding public office and the like, was ratified in 1811, but removed during the War of 1812. It can be found in the National Archives. It is also in a military manual from 1825 that has the original Constitution as the first chapter.
Essentially, since the US Republic ceased to exist in 1871, the only legal amendments are 1 through 13, in its original form.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66f309e388dca
Seadevil110 2 points 7 months ago
Yeah. Don't go heavy on the jooz.
I've had 7 idents. Got people on there kinda dependent on what I post(ed).
Got the ax for a WWII photo. Also for a photo of a Roman pendant in a museum.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=66dff9fad4b70
Seadevil110 0 points 7 months ago
Ever take grade school physics, jerk?
That would explain water. Of course, none of you nitwits ever consider a thing called center of gravity.
Dumbasses.
/v/FlattardClassroom viewpost?postid=66e06319dda15
Seadevil110 2 points 9 months ago
Why do you flat earth nitwits constantly exhibit your lack of understanding of physics?
/v/SPACEisFAKEandGAY viewpost?postid=66a537885599a
Seadevil110 0 points 10 months ago
None of the Nam is taught anywhere.
Those of us who served in that shithole don't want to talk, and we were shit to everyone when we came back, regardless what service.
Our missions, whatever they were, were classified. Our whereabouts (mine, at least) was hidden, as were our aircraft (helos).
We knew, at least most of us knew, Nam was a bullshit thing for LBJ and his great society, to hide it. We knew we weren't supposed to win. Many who tried, died because of that. "They" tried to kill my group by sending us to the Hanoi Hilton for a 'rescue' (twice), then pulled support so we were alone in Hanoi's airspace. Classified. Neither attempt was successful either way: the Hilton was unoccupied, and we got out, both helos, both times.
Stupid officers kill men. That's why the frag. Smart officers don't last in the mil, or don't make rank.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=667ab893461da
Seadevil110 3 points 11 months ago
Critical thinking. Since historically, those "medications" that do work are removed from the market in general (available only in specialized places), and merthiolate DID work to prevent infection, was it really poison? I'm 79; I used merthiolate on just about every open wound I got, which was many. Only in a couple cases did I not use it, and those got infected.
You'll find that virtually every product that was beneficial, in any way, eventually was removed and replaced with one that doesn't do the job.
/v/ShitBoomersSay viewpost?postid=6655ae91095ea
Seadevil110 1 point 1 year ago
Yeah, they are.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6623dd2a7a471
Seadevil110 0 points 1 year ago
And that is why Russia has complete air superiority in Ukraine.
Right.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6623dd2a7a471
Seadevil110 2 points 1 year ago
The F-35 isn't the most advanced plane we (and our supposed "allies") have. That title belongs to the F-22. As you said, the 35 is plagued with problems, and since it was a co-op effort, it will never supercede those designed and built in the US. Having dealt with technology from Europe et al, I never encountered really high end tech from those EU countries; in fact, in some cases, the engineers don't even understand the rules in electronics, and come up with really stupid crap.
Russians, on the other hand, are not the same. Those I've worked with were exceptionally fine engineers. In every case. From 1976 through 2009.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6623dd2a7a471
Seadevil110 2 points 1 year ago
Not just rumors. The 57 is truly a magnificent craft which can easily kick ass on an F-35. That was shown dramatically last year.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6623dd2a7a471
Seadevil110 -1 points 1 year ago
Then, as a matter of curiosity, what was it that we dropped in the Pacific (a nuke depth charge) in 1967 from a helo that went boom in a big way?
Yeah, it IS real, and yes, they DO go boom in a big way.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6623dd2a7a471
Seadevil110 0 points 1.2 years ago
I find it hard to believe that people still waste time on this stupid shit.
WTF is wrong with you people?
/v/FlattardClassroom viewpost?postid=65de28d761d16
Seadevil110 4 points 1.6 years ago
Sadly, I tend to agree. While I've been watching all this crap for my whole life (old also), and I think I understand what is going on worldwide, I see no good way out in the US, what with the infiltration.
Assuming the q is out there, and the evidence is positive, it seems to me that a return to basic infrastructure is inevitable, meaning the current system must be destroyed. Since that system was built by the 'dark side', that means all of it.
There is also the fact that education has been deteriorating since the 1950s: anyone who has lived a long time sees that. So we have a large segment of the population that is ignorant as shit. What will happen to them? Hell, a lot of them can't unstop a toilet. How can they possibly survive what will come?
/v/TellTalk viewpost?postid=6508a39a553f2
Seadevil110 -1 points 1.7 years ago
Reading this sort of garbage makes me wonder if we really are doomed.
Giant questions: did Americans have any choice about US entry into WWI?
Did Americans have a choice about US entry into WWII?
In both cases, a large majority would have said No.
So what, exactly, makes you think there was a choice about Korea, Vietnam, or any of the myriad other brushfire wars that were "fought"?
And what makes any of you think that previous generations had any choice about their future, or your future, in light of the answers to the above questions?
The entire century and a half + was engineered.
And you should know that if you don't.
/v/Boomers viewpost?postid=64ebefdacf5f8
Seadevil110 0 points 1.8 years ago
Well, that deteriorated quickly.
Want a Nam vet's observations? Maybe not, but here you go anyway.
If you look at the battles and where they were, where AO was sprayed, and the off limits targets, you can easily see that the 'war' was in SVN, not north. The bombs mostly fell on rice paddies. Tactically, it's obvious the war was not intended to be won.
So why? Look at what was happening in the US. First, the "attack" in the Tonkin Gulf was staged to start the conflict. Second, LBJ started up his great society - a move intended to destroy inner city family values, take away businesses and so forth. No one noticed. They didn't notice because they were all preoccupied with Nam.
Protests? Those were obviously designed by the clowns. Doesn't take much to convince some people to follow the leader. Those were reinforcement to the distraction of Nam.
Soldiers in Nam knew the thing was useless, and they were all pretty much cannon fodder: they just didn't say it out loud.
Nam was used as a distraction to usher in the progressive movement, aka nwo.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=64c4a3dbeb842
Seadevil110 0 points 1.8 years ago
We 'know' nothing of the sort. Here are two references from encylopedias in 1933 and 1947. If 6 million were gassed, how can these numbers be reconciled?
In 1933, approximately 9.5 million Jews lived in Europe, comprising 1.7% of the total European population. This number represented more than 60 percent of the world's Jewish population at that time, estimated at 15.3 million. Eastern Europe The majority of Jews in prewar Europe resided in eastern Europe.
World Almanac USA, 1947, pg. 748: World Jewish Population -- 15,690,000 World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289: World Jewish Population -- 15,713,638 Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA 1951 -- 15,300,000
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=64bf748e61ab7
Seadevil110 1 point 1.8 years ago
I guess my Taurus has a lot of problems.
Funny. Never encountered any of them.
But then, I guess having a piece that fits, is comfy, accurate, and does good groups isn't good enough. Guess it should have a better name.
Also reckon I better get into the 'spray and pray' mode. Sorry, but my concealed test had 10 kills head shots, 10 kills heart shots. Any one of them would put someone down.
Or maybe there are lots of people don't really know how to shoot.
But what do I know, only been shooting for 73 years, including a war and some other work.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=64a84a52b7621
Seadevil110 0 points 1.8 years ago
I'm willing to wager that the people who have posted on this thread haven't yet had to actually do somebody.
If you had, you wouldn't be saying the shit you do.
How about it?
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=64a84a52b7621
Seadevil110 0 points 1.8 years ago
How many people you kill with your gun?
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=64a84a52b7621
Seadevil110 0 points 1.8 years ago
Remember that the 9mm was designed to wound, not kill.
The 9 is gentle to shoot, yes. But if you are in a situ, regaradless what people say, what you really want is to shoot the threat and not have to shoot it again.
I read a lot of crud about 'this gun failed after 3 mags' and such bullshit. It is exactly that: bullshit. When you need to use a gun, you better have spent your money on practice with a gun that fits you, not something that someone spent hours on a range shooting targets to see when it will fail.
And those who yak on about hot loads and the rest of that crap, take note: almost NO ONE who gets a weapon for defense is going to load whatever it is to its max. So if your advice is that sort of thing, just quit.
Any combat vet, not cops, mind you, is well aware that the best defense is to put down the enemy as quickly as possible. What that really means is having the power available to do so, and having the necessary skill.
Shooting 35 rounds at a target you don't kill is useless. Find a gun that is reasonably reliable, and above all, fits YOU.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=64a84a52b7621
Seadevil110 0 points 1.8 years ago
Those of us who have fiddled with firearms for many years know this.
A similar situ exists when comparing a 45ACP and 9mm.
Don't have a 45-70, but do have a 444 Marlin. Not quite the same, but close enough. So long as you don't mind the recoil.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=64a7d75653e6b
Seadevil110 0 points 1.8 years ago
General agreement with Zyklonbeekeeper. However, I do have a G3, which I use concealed. Main handgun gotos are a bit large, Ruger 357 and 1911, both are my around home handguns. Note that 'around home' is ~40 acres, and concealed is going to town, population ~2500, with roughly 2499 residents carrying concealed. That, of course, is an exhageration, sort of, but if any meatheads started anything, survival would be questionable.
I do like the G3 though; just that I'd rather have something more brutal for general defensive work.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=64a84a52b7621
Seadevil110 2 points 1.8 years ago
No, we didn't.
It was never intended to be won. Vietnam was a diversion from the progressive takeover by Lyndon Johnson.
The "incident" never happened in 1964. Film from nose cams of the F-4s sent in support showed no boat trails. Proved fake by 1969.
Agent Orange was 'applied' only in the south. Many tactically strategic areas in the north were off limits - no aircraft could fly over or attack the dumps/staging areas.
At home, the "great society" was in the process of destroying inner city communities. No one bothered to make that newsworthy, since Vietnam was the headliner.
If the intent was to win, we could have deployed an invasion force to Hanoi. The VC/NVA would have been hung out to dry, and within weeks it would have been done: this from a multi-tour officer.
Incidentally, a large percentage of the VC force was forcibly inducted into the fight.
Note that the first incursion of US troops met absolutely no resistance.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=64a19748f287d